Obtained dog 11-17-17 for safe keeping. Refused to hold/return/release dog to friends or family. Falsely claimed animal neglect. Cut dog collar off and testified "forseeable harm” based upon a rope collar, harness, and handle. Abused microchip registry extracted my unique identifier registered to myself to register dog elsewhere. Claimed nobody contacted them to facilitate or arrange accommodations for boarding or return. Ignored phone calls, visits, demand letters. Cut off dogs collar with a pocket knife stated in court on record by animal control officer deceptively constructing an emergency procedure to accuse myself as a neglectful owner, criminal accusations dismissed/stricken regarding cruelty or neglect. Veterinary exam found dog bright alert friendly responsive and healthy 11-18-17 without any injury or damage while noting perfect health aside from diarrhea did state animal control cut collar but veterinarian found no injury and did not view collar. Refused to return dog yet stated no attempts were made. Over 20 phone calls made, three people called, demand letters served, and in-person visits made to claim dog. Dog later adopted to friend of shelter 12-9-18. 7-5-17 shelter instructed to produce that dog a service animal tag signatures on documentation include self, judge, district attorney rep.
Upland Animal Shelter, Inc. Reviews
Obtained dog 11-17-17 for safe keeping. Refused to hold/return/release dog to friends or family. Falsely claimed animal neglect. Cut dog collar off and testified "forseeable harm” based upon a rope collar, harness, and handle. Abused microchip registry extracted my unique identifier registered to myself to register dog elsewhere. Claimed nobody contacted them to facilitate or arrange accommodations for boarding or return. Ignored phone calls, visits, demand letters. Cut off dogs collar with a pocket knife stated in court on record by animal control officer deceptively constructing an emergency procedure to accuse myself as a neglectful owner, criminal accusations dismissed/stricken regarding cruelty or neglect. Veterinary exam found dog bright alert friendly responsive and healthy 11-18-17 without any injury or damage while noting perfect health aside from diarrhea did state animal control cut collar but veterinarian found no injury and did not view collar. Refused to return dog yet stated no attempts were made. Over 20 phone calls made, three people called, demand letters served, and in-person visits made to claim dog. Dog later adopted to friend of shelter 12-9-18. 7-5-17 shelter instructed to produce that dog a service animal tag signatures on documentation include self, judge, district attorney rep.