A case where the Queensland Australia RTA has enabled and offered collusion and obstruction related to real estate and other crimes such as fraud is detailed here.
I rented an apartment in late 2018 in Fortitude Valley Queensland Australia and to summarize I was misled as to the state of repair and cleanliness of the unit and learned at move in time that the unit was not fit to reside in.
The management company AND QLD RTA agreed and indicated my deposit bond monies would be returned.
This is at time of move in.
For many months no effort was made to remedy the breaches, no effort to clean and repair the defective items or to make the unit right.
Other crimes were done to me and eventually I learned that the building would be condemned and based on that I left for cause knowing as agreed, they are not in compliance.
I initiated a complaint process once I moved out with the QLD RTA and had dialogs with them that continued into late 2019 and at one point I was told I'd be refunded as of late 2019.
As of now I contacted them again to provide new information and to know more of the status of the problem and now I am lied to again by someone who claims to be another "Boss" - Stuart Taylor of the QLD RTA.
A copy of Mr. Taylor's abortion of law and justice is cited here along with my reply to him for it all:
Please note beyond the other factually inaccurate claims and the wants to now blame ME for this, he begins with this statement and the rest that in fact makes Mr. Roach an injured party now by Taylor's hand:
Taylor Said: [I understand that Alan has previously provided correspondence regarding the closure of your case as there was insufficient evidence to proceed.]
That is false and Mr. Roach solicited additional information from me for a period of time and asked specifically for more information related to the Kookaburra Inn et al. I have all those emails saved and this proves Taylor guilty of collusion and fraud in this now. This implicates the QLD RTA and there are other more serious crimes they join via the thefts.
Taylor's Email And My Response:
--- BEGIN QUOTE --
Hello Stuart,
Thank you for taking the time to review my witness of ongoing concerns related to 82 Alfred Street in Fortitude Valley, the surrounding behaviours at Kookaburra Inn, as well as other concerns I've understood.
It has been a pleasure working with Alan Roach and he was forthright with dialog and questions related to the problems which really are crimes and this is now a set of felony thefts as well.
To your first point:
> [I have reviewed your previous investigation IN44332 and the additional concerns that you subsequently raised regarding your stay at the Kookaburra Inn, Spring Hill, Brisbane. I understand that Alan has previously provided correspondence regarding the closure of your case as there was insufficient evidence to proceed.]
I was not aware that the case was closed, and I was not informed of it as such. Since these parties are guilty and seem to be out of business as such, the problem remains where are my monies? And recall that at the time the bond was confirmed with me, I was told as BCZ agreed, they are not in compliance and the unit was not habitable hence a refund would be made to me. Waiting and stealing weekly rent monies and assaulting me after breaking into my home many times does not improve or pay their debt to me. Does it?
So where is it? Being it is my money.
To your next paragraph:
> [The further concerns that you continue to raise regarding your stay at the Kookaburra Inn are not suitable for the Residential Tenancies Authority (RTA). The RTA Investigations regulates the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008. The concerns that you are raising are allegations of serious criminal offences and do not fall within the scope of authority that the RTA has to investigate. I recommend that you raise these concerns with the Queensland Police Service or other agencies that fall within the jurisdiction of your complaint.]
That is fair enough but again one would rightly expect and want to know if others are involved in real estate frauds and crimes that end up causing other residents issues. I won't possibly know all of that and likely others will not as well.
To your third paragraph:
> [It has also been brought to my attention the number times you have contacted Alan Roach, including recently, and the length of the voicemail messages left for him. The content of those calls is not appropriate and also completely fill up the voicemail message space, making it impossible for others to leave him a message till they are cleared out.]
Really the substance of the problems would matter more than actually taking time to count them and complain about the fact someone was able and willing to detail problems to you, but worry more of the number. I can also generate reams of paper on this single problem alone and despite you wanting to play the victim on that aspect, I remain the injured party.
You and Mr. Roach are NOT the injured party. Nor is BCZ.
Consider what I've been through speaking of length of time and number of iterations etc.
To be fair to me, the fact this went on is the problem, and recall I won't know any of what you NOW cite as a problem since none of that was explained to me. Why bother now? I was in fact told to expect the money back and Mr. Roach said NONE of what you NOW claim he said to me. Know that. So no foundation on law for it and none on facts. Failures for two reasons at least.
To your further statements:
> [I have reviewed the content, frequency and relevance of the communication you have sent to Alan Roach and do not believe that there is a need for further communication from you to him regarding this case. The investigation is closed.]
Why do that now? The dialog and witness is formed as one is able to do so. And the problems for one reason or another involved other persons. Citing frequency and number of occurrences is specious and would not be defensible on your part since it has no relevance to the process to investigate, and would be seen as being obstruction. In effect you do this to steal money from people and then lie to them about the problems. Any reason that Mr. Roach did not indicate this to me before this time? I was in fact told that my bond would be returned. A man in the middle trap done to steal the funds and to conspire with the crimes overall it seems now. How else can it be seen?
You are too critical of those who are needlessly harmed in your State and now you are party to the crimes.
> [Please do not communicate further with Alan Roach.]
Why not? Can he not have asked that before and told me what you have told me and done so sooner? Why wait till now?
What if I ignore you and continue to contact him, then what? Your offer is in bad faith and is also factually incorrect, since you misspeak as to what Mr. Roach said and did not say. In other words you are wrong, in total.
As to your "concerns", so what?
Are you out of business? Changing your charter to now be slum lords? So far you make no sense. Consider what you've just offered to me.
And it matters what I was told and when. What you just replied with is wrong.
> [If you have any questions regarding this, please let me know.]
Of course, again, where is my money? What is the status of BCZ, and the property at Alfred Street that I was told is being condemned? Why were they paid?
I am sure you can understand how your response so far is wrong. And not acceptable. And illegal. Now I can prosecute YOU for this, yes? This is enabling and collusion as well as obstruction. Unless you have better ideas than what you've just written to me since none of that works.
Again be fair to me. The foundation for your gripes related to me have no basis in fact or law. They are a crime and a fraud themselves anew. Again what you just said to me is not true.
Your disputatious and picayune retorts also won't support the fact criminals were allowed to steal my money and attack me and deprive me of a home.
You have another idea to defend what you've just said and done? I'd need to hear it.
You are going to need to do better in other words. And your want to defer to others has already been addressed, I've done my diligence there also. You claim otherwise? Again you'd be wrong.
Your reply is specious, malformed, and factually incorrect.
]
END QUOTE
Now Taylor and others decide to pay for and be guilty of the other crimes ongoing in QLD.
I'd not do business with any of these criminals ever.
The State of Queensland Reviews
Dilatory Tactics, Collusion With Real Estate Frauds, Perjury And Theft
The State of Queensland Residential Tenancies Authority
https://www.rta.qld.gov.au/
Phone number (within Australia) 1300 366 311
Phone number (international) +61 7 3046 5400 (international)
Location address: Level 23, 179 Turbot Street Brisbane Queensland Australia 4001
Pseudo Boss In Question: [email protected] +61 7 3046 5645
A case where the Queensland Australia RTA has enabled and offered collusion and obstruction related to real estate and other crimes such as fraud is detailed here.
I rented an apartment in late 2018 in Fortitude Valley Queensland Australia and to summarize I was misled as to the state of repair and cleanliness of the unit and learned at move in time that the unit was not fit to reside in.
The management company AND QLD RTA agreed and indicated my deposit bond monies would be returned.
This is at time of move in.
For many months no effort was made to remedy the breaches, no effort to clean and repair the defective items or to make the unit right.
Other crimes were done to me and eventually I learned that the building would be condemned and based on that I left for cause knowing as agreed, they are not in compliance.
I initiated a complaint process once I moved out with the QLD RTA and had dialogs with them that continued into late 2019 and at one point I was told I'd be refunded as of late 2019.
As of now I contacted them again to provide new information and to know more of the status of the problem and now I am lied to again by someone who claims to be another "Boss" - Stuart Taylor of the QLD RTA.
A copy of Mr. Taylor's abortion of law and justice is cited here along with my reply to him for it all:
Please note beyond the other factually inaccurate claims and the wants to now blame ME for this, he begins with this statement and the rest that in fact makes Mr. Roach an injured party now by Taylor's hand:
Taylor Said: [I understand that Alan has previously provided correspondence regarding the closure of your case as there was insufficient evidence to proceed.]
That is false and Mr. Roach solicited additional information from me for a period of time and asked specifically for more information related to the Kookaburra Inn et al. I have all those emails saved and this proves Taylor guilty of collusion and fraud in this now. This implicates the QLD RTA and there are other more serious crimes they join via the thefts.
Taylor's Email And My Response:
--- BEGIN QUOTE --
Hello Stuart,
Thank you for taking the time to review my witness of ongoing concerns related to 82 Alfred Street in Fortitude Valley, the surrounding behaviours at Kookaburra Inn, as well as other concerns I've understood.
It has been a pleasure working with Alan Roach and he was forthright with dialog and questions related to the problems which really are crimes and this is now a set of felony thefts as well.
To your first point:
> [I have reviewed your previous investigation IN44332 and the additional concerns that you subsequently raised regarding your stay at the Kookaburra Inn, Spring Hill, Brisbane. I understand that Alan has previously provided correspondence regarding the closure of your case as there was insufficient evidence to proceed.]
I was not aware that the case was closed, and I was not informed of it as such. Since these parties are guilty and seem to be out of business as such, the problem remains where are my monies? And recall that at the time the bond was confirmed with me, I was told as BCZ agreed, they are not in compliance and the unit was not habitable hence a refund would be made to me. Waiting and stealing weekly rent monies and assaulting me after breaking into my home many times does not improve or pay their debt to me. Does it?
So where is it? Being it is my money.
To your next paragraph:
> [The further concerns that you continue to raise regarding your stay at the Kookaburra Inn are not suitable for the Residential Tenancies Authority (RTA). The RTA Investigations regulates the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008. The concerns that you are raising are allegations of serious criminal offences and do not fall within the scope of authority that the RTA has to investigate. I recommend that you raise these concerns with the Queensland Police Service or other agencies that fall within the jurisdiction of your complaint.]
That is fair enough but again one would rightly expect and want to know if others are involved in real estate frauds and crimes that end up causing other residents issues. I won't possibly know all of that and likely others will not as well.
To your third paragraph:
> [It has also been brought to my attention the number times you have contacted Alan Roach, including recently, and the length of the voicemail messages left for him. The content of those calls is not appropriate and also completely fill up the voicemail message space, making it impossible for others to leave him a message till they are cleared out.]
Really the substance of the problems would matter more than actually taking time to count them and complain about the fact someone was able and willing to detail problems to you, but worry more of the number. I can also generate reams of paper on this single problem alone and despite you wanting to play the victim on that aspect, I remain the injured party.
You and Mr. Roach are NOT the injured party. Nor is BCZ.
Consider what I've been through speaking of length of time and number of iterations etc.
To be fair to me, the fact this went on is the problem, and recall I won't know any of what you NOW cite as a problem since none of that was explained to me. Why bother now? I was in fact told to expect the money back and Mr. Roach said NONE of what you NOW claim he said to me. Know that. So no foundation on law for it and none on facts. Failures for two reasons at least.
To your further statements:
> [I have reviewed the content, frequency and relevance of the communication you have sent to Alan Roach and do not believe that there is a need for further communication from you to him regarding this case. The investigation is closed.]
Why do that now? The dialog and witness is formed as one is able to do so. And the problems for one reason or another involved other persons. Citing frequency and number of occurrences is specious and would not be defensible on your part since it has no relevance to the process to investigate, and would be seen as being obstruction. In effect you do this to steal money from people and then lie to them about the problems. Any reason that Mr. Roach did not indicate this to me before this time? I was in fact told that my bond would be returned. A man in the middle trap done to steal the funds and to conspire with the crimes overall it seems now. How else can it be seen?
You are too critical of those who are needlessly harmed in your State and now you are party to the crimes.
> [Please do not communicate further with Alan Roach.]
Why not? Can he not have asked that before and told me what you have told me and done so sooner? Why wait till now?
What if I ignore you and continue to contact him, then what? Your offer is in bad faith and is also factually incorrect, since you misspeak as to what Mr. Roach said and did not say. In other words you are wrong, in total.
As to your "concerns", so what?
Are you out of business? Changing your charter to now be slum lords? So far you make no sense. Consider what you've just offered to me.
And it matters what I was told and when. What you just replied with is wrong.
> [If you have any questions regarding this, please let me know.]
Of course, again, where is my money? What is the status of BCZ, and the property at Alfred Street that I was told is being condemned? Why were they paid?
I am sure you can understand how your response so far is wrong. And not acceptable. And illegal. Now I can prosecute YOU for this, yes? This is enabling and collusion as well as obstruction. Unless you have better ideas than what you've just written to me since none of that works.
Again be fair to me. The foundation for your gripes related to me have no basis in fact or law. They are a crime and a fraud themselves anew. Again what you just said to me is not true.
Your disputatious and picayune retorts also won't support the fact criminals were allowed to steal my money and attack me and deprive me of a home.
You have another idea to defend what you've just said and done? I'd need to hear it.
You are going to need to do better in other words. And your want to defer to others has already been addressed, I've done my diligence there also. You claim otherwise? Again you'd be wrong.
Your reply is specious, malformed, and factually incorrect.
]
END QUOTE
Now Taylor and others decide to pay for and be guilty of the other crimes ongoing in QLD.
I'd not do business with any of these criminals ever.