If any attorney out there can really help, I'd appreciate it. In Feb 2009 I was convicted of violating a restraining order for sending a text message to the protected person. I have no priors at all. No arrest record. Went to trial. Protected person actually gave me pretty favorable testimony citing that I never threatened or caused physical harm, nor emotional harm. It was basically a business relationship & sexual that went wrong & she claimed that I don't stop calling her.. well honestly; she was just vengeful and I was a weekly gun shooter at the range; my love in life.. and she straight wanted to take that love away from me and that's what happened. The personal issues revolving the case really don't matter, but I can say they were favorable to me. Very honestly, there was no evidence against me and they took me to court because they claimed I sent her text messages. that was the basis for the violation. There was no evidence of such and they didn't even subpoena phone records to prove it !!
Here's the deal. Bridgman attorney put his guy Errol Cook to handle my trial. In the middle of the trail the DA asked to admit additional evidence, after discover and all that stuff... you're talking after jury selection !!! The DA presented pictures of my ex's cell phone display with text messages reading vulgar and black racial slurs... (now here's the kicker, my attorney Cook is black) I didn't send these. The pics of the phone show the messages coming from her son's phone number, not mine.. they don't show they were forwarded or anything. They really honestly show coming from her own son's phone ! (he's 40 years old by the way and a druggie).... no problem.. no evidence. i'm in the clear.. that's what I KNEW to be... Cook whispered to me and asked, how do you want me to handle this? and I responded.. well they don't have any phone records to prove it came from me and it says in plain english that it came from her son so obvioulsy we should just deny it and were done! He acknowledged and went right up to the jury and in response to the pics of the cell phone.. he claimed that I sent them in response to received text messages. He straight went up there and did exactly opposite of what we agreed upon and just threw the whole trial away !!
Now I'm gonna tell you that if I was racist or prejudice, then why would I have a black guy representing me? Furthermore I gave him many compliments and I even gave him a bank of america stock tip at $5.40 per share and he could have tripled his money on that advice. I was really gung h*o about this guy until he thew me under the bus? I did 39 days in LA county twin towers, 240 hrs of community service, I'm on 4 years of informal probation. my right to bear arms is gone, i paid bridgman $6,000, I had to go through CA dept of Insurance hearing to keep my license with the state for my career and that was trying... I'm on a restricted now.. My employer terminated me and I had to seek a new broker dealer firm.. Can anyone help me get back at this guy for shafting me ?
WARNING!!! Do not use this law firm, they will take your money and not do anything for you. I have a civil case going on with Robert C. Marshall @ Phresh Ta Def, i hired Bridgeman & Associates to help me recover the money that was scammed from me. I gave them over $6,000 to take my case and they didn't do jack. All they did was contact his lawyer Svitlana Sangary via email and for a 15 minute talk, they charged me over $100. I came to them with evidence for my case and it was another $100 just to see a lawyer. If you say one letter to them, they will charge you for their time. The lawyer who represented my case under Bruce was Caroline Molloy. She's a nice lady but she under the direction of Bruce and he's one sleazy money hungry dude. In the end the case was still stuck in court waiting for a litigation date, i have changed lawyers and hope to get this civil case settled. But yeah, if you want your money to go for nothing, just go with Bruce Bridgeman & Associates. He is far by the worst law firm i had experiences with.
I worked for this attorney for a few years, and hated every minute of it. I was constanting receiving phone calls from clients alledging that Bruce made promises to people. As an attorney it is against the law to make promises as to the outcome of a case.
In addition, Bruce withdrew 127,000.00 dollars from the Attorney Client Trust Account in order to purchase his home in Huntington Beach with his client/new girlfriend Lana Taylor. Lana Taylor was a family law client and it is illegal to date a client. The Attorney Client trust account is not personal funds and it is illegal to co-mingle funds from the trust account with personal monies.
Thousands of people have been ripped off by the person. Check Katrina Nguyen v. Bridgman. Katrina was promised Michael Capizzi as their attorney, instead they got Chris Glew a brand new attorney with zero experience. They believe what this man says because he represents himself as an attorney. People should be able to rely on the words of an attorney, not be getting ripped off.
If you send a covert "Client" to his office for a consultation on a criminal matter he will tell them that he is the attorney, make promises as to the outcome of a case (ie no jail time), take your money and do nothing to deliver. Instead he will send the case out of his office to another brand new attorney, probably one who has never handled serious cases, and never speak to you again. And if you are an attractive young female most likely he will hit on you.
There once was a client who contacted me because Bruce had promised to pay her court fines in exchange for a weekend of sex and drugs. He filed a fradulent bankruptcy, and there is many many many more indecretions regarding this person.
I don't really want my name published in this, however, will be very cooperative if you have help the public not be ripped off any further.
The Law Office of Bruce C. Bridgman Reviews
If any attorney out there can really help, I'd appreciate it. In Feb 2009 I was convicted of violating a restraining order for sending a text message to the protected person. I have no priors at all. No arrest record. Went to trial. Protected person actually gave me pretty favorable testimony citing that I never threatened or caused physical harm, nor emotional harm. It was basically a business relationship & sexual that went wrong & she claimed that I don't stop calling her.. well honestly; she was just vengeful and I was a weekly gun shooter at the range; my love in life.. and she straight wanted to take that love away from me and that's what happened. The personal issues revolving the case really don't matter, but I can say they were favorable to me. Very honestly, there was no evidence against me and they took me to court because they claimed I sent her text messages. that was the basis for the violation. There was no evidence of such and they didn't even subpoena phone records to prove it !!
Here's the deal. Bridgman attorney put his guy Errol Cook to handle my trial. In the middle of the trail the DA asked to admit additional evidence, after discover and all that stuff... you're talking after jury selection !!! The DA presented pictures of my ex's cell phone display with text messages reading vulgar and black racial slurs... (now here's the kicker, my attorney Cook is black) I didn't send these. The pics of the phone show the messages coming from her son's phone number, not mine.. they don't show they were forwarded or anything. They really honestly show coming from her own son's phone ! (he's 40 years old by the way and a druggie).... no problem.. no evidence. i'm in the clear.. that's what I KNEW to be... Cook whispered to me and asked, how do you want me to handle this? and I responded.. well they don't have any phone records to prove it came from me and it says in plain english that it came from her son so obvioulsy we should just deny it and were done! He acknowledged and went right up to the jury and in response to the pics of the cell phone.. he claimed that I sent them in response to received text messages. He straight went up there and did exactly opposite of what we agreed upon and just threw the whole trial away !!
Now I'm gonna tell you that if I was racist or prejudice, then why would I have a black guy representing me? Furthermore I gave him many compliments and I even gave him a bank of america stock tip at $5.40 per share and he could have tripled his money on that advice. I was really gung h*o about this guy until he thew me under the bus? I did 39 days in LA county twin towers, 240 hrs of community service, I'm on 4 years of informal probation. my right to bear arms is gone, i paid bridgman $6,000, I had to go through CA dept of Insurance hearing to keep my license with the state for my career and that was trying... I'm on a restricted now.. My employer terminated me and I had to seek a new broker dealer firm.. Can anyone help me get back at this guy for shafting me ?
WARNING!!! Do not use this law firm, they will take your money and not do anything for you. I have a civil case going on with Robert C. Marshall @ Phresh Ta Def, i hired Bridgeman & Associates to help me recover the money that was scammed from me. I gave them over $6,000 to take my case and they didn't do jack. All they did was contact his lawyer Svitlana Sangary via email and for a 15 minute talk, they charged me over $100. I came to them with evidence for my case and it was another $100 just to see a lawyer. If you say one letter to them, they will charge you for their time. The lawyer who represented my case under Bruce was Caroline Molloy. She's a nice lady but she under the direction of Bruce and he's one sleazy money hungry dude. In the end the case was still stuck in court waiting for a litigation date, i have changed lawyers and hope to get this civil case settled. But yeah, if you want your money to go for nothing, just go with Bruce Bridgeman & Associates. He is far by the worst law firm i had experiences with.
Pls contact me
Contact me ASAP please I would like to hear your story.
I worked for this attorney for a few years, and hated every minute of it. I was constanting receiving phone calls from clients alledging that Bruce made promises to people. As an attorney it is against the law to make promises as to the outcome of a case.
In addition, Bruce withdrew 127,000.00 dollars from the Attorney Client Trust Account in order to purchase his home in Huntington Beach with his client/new girlfriend Lana Taylor. Lana Taylor was a family law client and it is illegal to date a client. The Attorney Client trust account is not personal funds and it is illegal to co-mingle funds from the trust account with personal monies.
Thousands of people have been ripped off by the person. Check Katrina Nguyen v. Bridgman. Katrina was promised Michael Capizzi as their attorney, instead they got Chris Glew a brand new attorney with zero experience. They believe what this man says because he represents himself as an attorney. People should be able to rely on the words of an attorney, not be getting ripped off.
If you send a covert "Client" to his office for a consultation on a criminal matter he will tell them that he is the attorney, make promises as to the outcome of a case (ie no jail time), take your money and do nothing to deliver. Instead he will send the case out of his office to another brand new attorney, probably one who has never handled serious cases, and never speak to you again. And if you are an attractive young female most likely he will hit on you.
There once was a client who contacted me because Bruce had promised to pay her court fines in exchange for a weekend of sex and drugs. He filed a fradulent bankruptcy, and there is many many many more indecretions regarding this person.
I don't really want my name published in this, however, will be very cooperative if you have help the public not be ripped off any further.