Judge William Dodson is a judge temporarily assigned to my case in the small claims court of Pasadena Court House, on April 25, 2019. William Dodson showed clear racial discrimination against the plaintiff (Asian).
Brief Introduction of the Case
At the end of March 2017, the plaintiff leased a house from the defendant. The plaintiff’s family got sick immediately. The plaintiff’s family smelt mold. The plaintiff repeatedly asked for a mold report from the agent of defendant and defendant herself but received no response. The plaintiff ordered a mold inspection himself which revealed toxic molds in extremely high density. The plaintiff notified the defendant he would move out immediately, which was 5 days after he moved in.
The defendant came to the house aggressively trying to stop the move and lied to the plaintiff that molds found in the house were not harmful (audio recorded). In a later email, she denied she ever said that. 5 months after the plaintiff left, the defendant found a tenant, who stayed for one year. After that tenant left, the moldy house was vacant for 7 months.
The plaintiff sued for the deposit and prepaid rent, which the defendant ignored all his request to return. The defendant countersued for lost rent. (Please notice that 7 is greater than 5. Namely, without the plaintiff’s presence, the defendant has more trouble leasing the house out.) Dodson denied all the requests from the plaintiff and awarded everything the defendant asked for.
Evidence of Racial Discrimination of Judge William Dodson
Racial Discrimination Evidence 1.1:
Allowing the defendant to bring someone completely irrelevant to the case to argue for her at the capacity of her attorney, in a small claims case
During the trial, the defendant seldom spoke, except at the end, when Judge William Dodson asked her, do you have anything to add to what he said? The ‘he’ being the defendant’s brother, who has no role in contract involved, but did virtually all the talking for the defendant during the trial. Please note that this is a small claims court and everyone has to represent herself/himself.
The defendant is an attorney herself. Instead of having to defend herself, she was allowed by Judge William Dodson to have her brother defend her as her lawyer. Also, has her brother passed the bar exam yet? If not, could he legally act as an attorney?
Racial Discrimination Evidence 1.2:
Allowing the defendant to ignore the subpoena completely without any explanations, verbal or written
The defendant was served subpoena which requires her to bring documents relevant to the case. The defendant completely ignored it and brought none of the documents, with no explanations, verbal or written
Racial Discrimination Evidence 1.3:
Allowing the defendant’ counterclaim to stand without being served in time.
The defendant served the plaintiff a counterclaim notice 6 days before the trial. When the plaintiff pointed out that the counterclaim should be voided since it was not served in a timely manner, Judge William Dodson said he would allow it and if the plaintiff was not happy about it, the plaintiff would have to ask for a continuance. Notice the ridiculous logic of Judge William Dodson here, he is asking the plaintiff to do something so as to help make the defendant’s counterclaim legitimate.
Racial Discrimination Evidence 1.4:
Allowing the defendant to interrupt the plaintiff frequently
Judge William Dodson allowed the defendant’s brother and the defendant to make offensive comments and noise while the plaintiff was speaking but warned sternly the plaintiff not to speak when the plaintiff asked for permission to speak.
Racial Discrimination Evidence 5:
Allowing the defendant to ignore the plaintiff’s request of evidence
The defendant’s brother claimed the delivery of itemized statement within 21 days of my move-out. The plaintiff immediately asked for evidence. The request was simply ignored by Judge William Dodson.
Racial Discrimination Evidence 5
Per Judge William Dodson’s judgment letter, it is apparent that he ignored all the evidence provided by the plaintiff and come up with new evidence himself trying to disprove what the plaintiff showed. The problem is, the evidence he came up with is either completely irrelevant or in direct contrast to what he concluded.
Judge William Dodson based his judgment largely on two online articles he cited. The first article is completely irrelevant. Citing the second article, Judge William Dodson’s concluded the following:
“Mold spores are everywhere and are not harmful to healthy persons.”
Needless to say, the article did not indicate anything near what he said.
Judge William Dodson’s logic is apparently wrong and laughably so. If his logic is right, he can say the same thing about bacteria and virus. I am sure Judge William Dodson would not mind contributing to humankind by taking inhalations of various types of bacteria, virus, and mold as a subject in toxicity experiments. He will be the best subject human race has ever found since he would not be harmed, regardless of what types of the bacteria, virus, and mold he inhales and at what density.
Judge William Dodson deliberately ignores all the evidence of the toxicity of the specific molds found in the inspection report. Both the mold inspection report of the house and a literature review the plaintiff produced has provided made it crystal clear that the specific molds found in high density in the house are toxic and cause diseases.
Judge William Dodson deliberately ignored the basic numbers in the case. After the plaintiff left, the defendant spent 5 months to find a new tenant. After the new tenant left, the defendant spent 7 months looking for tenants but the moldy house is still vacant in the trial. If the plaintiff is responsible for anything, it would be that the plaintiff should be rewarded for shortening the tenant search time by 2 months. Instead, Judge William Dodson demanded that the plaintiff pays more than 10 thousand dollars for lost rent.
One can surely interpret Judge William Dodson’s misreading of evidence as gross incompetence or lack of due diligence, just like that of the traffic court judge who delegated his job to his clerk. While the traffic court judge was in chambers, the clerk heard pleas and imposed sentences. That traffic court judge was one of the 43 California judges reprimanded for misconduct in 2014. However, incompetence and lack of due diligence might not be the full story.
In fact, neither the defendant’s brother nor the defendant ever denied the toxicity of the molds found in the house in the trial. They did tell that lie, two years ago, when they stood outside of the moldy house trying to stop the plaintiff from moving out. (the lie was audio recorded) In all fairness, the lie told by these two was a lesser version than the one told by Judge William Dodson. They just said that the molds found in their moldy house were not harmful. The plaintiff later emailed the defendant asking her to give reference to what she said, she denied she ever said that in email. Even the defendant realized it was a lie that can be easily caught, while Judge William Dodson, a judge, told it in writing. Why? Did Judge William Dodson get this idea from the defendant in a private conversation? Is there any conflict of interest involved? Or is it the plain old racial discrimination?
Summary
The society owes the next generation a safe place to grow up. If we cannot make sure to rip the world of baby killers, we can at least see to it that there is this precious public good call legal justice, whereupon baby killers cannot easily get away with profiting at the expense of baby death.
Judge William Dodson is damaging this public good with his racial discrimination. Small claims court was made available so that people with less resource available to them can also afford justice. Judge William Dodson is stopping that justice from serving people. Judge William Dodson should be removed from his position.
In what follows, we cite a story from the history of medical science, to put in perspective, the damage Judge William Dodson can do to the society, if we don’t stop him.
There are two competing logics:
Logic 1: You can let the baby take a drug until it is proved toxic
Logic 2: You should let the baby take a drug only when it is proved safe
At this stage of history, common sense demands Logic2. However, in what follows, we will show the hefty price the society has paid to learn Logic 2 and abandon Logic 1.
In 1960, while the sedative Kevadon (Thalidomide), made in Europe, had already been sold to pregnant women in Europe for morning sickness, Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey refuses to sign it off for the following reason:
Although the manufacturer has provided evidence that the drug is safe for the pregnant mom, it has not proved that it is safe for the fetus.
Richardson-Merrell, the seller of the drug, put enormous pressure on Dr. Kelsey. Fortunately, she was proved right--- years later, Europeans found that Kevadon results in baby deformation: limbs fail to develop properly, in some cases also eyes, ears, and internal organs. No one knows how many miscarriages the drug caused, but it's estimated that, in Germany alone, 10,000 babies were born affected by Thalidomide.
Congress bestowed on Dr. Kelsey a medal for service to humanity and passed legislation requiring drug makers to prove that new products were safe and effective before marketing them. President John F. Kennedy signed the landmark law that she had inspired and presented her with the nation’s highest federal civilian service award.
Logic 1 is the logic of the drug company that was about to profit in the expense of the baby.
Logic 2 is the logic of Dr. Kelsey, who saves babies.
Congress confirms that Logic2 is to replace Logic1.
The society thanks people like Dr. Kelsey for saving baby lives.
Judge William Dodson’s racial discrimination or/and gross negligence is about to undo all that.
Superior Court of California Los Angeles Reviews
Judge William Dodson is a judge temporarily assigned to my case in the small claims court of Pasadena Court House, on April 25, 2019. William Dodson showed clear racial discrimination against the plaintiff (Asian).
Brief Introduction of the Case
At the end of March 2017, the plaintiff leased a house from the defendant. The plaintiff’s family got sick immediately. The plaintiff’s family smelt mold. The plaintiff repeatedly asked for a mold report from the agent of defendant and defendant herself but received no response. The plaintiff ordered a mold inspection himself which revealed toxic molds in extremely high density. The plaintiff notified the defendant he would move out immediately, which was 5 days after he moved in.
The defendant came to the house aggressively trying to stop the move and lied to the plaintiff that molds found in the house were not harmful (audio recorded). In a later email, she denied she ever said that. 5 months after the plaintiff left, the defendant found a tenant, who stayed for one year. After that tenant left, the moldy house was vacant for 7 months.
The plaintiff sued for the deposit and prepaid rent, which the defendant ignored all his request to return. The defendant countersued for lost rent. (Please notice that 7 is greater than 5. Namely, without the plaintiff’s presence, the defendant has more trouble leasing the house out.) Dodson denied all the requests from the plaintiff and awarded everything the defendant asked for.
Evidence of Racial Discrimination of Judge William Dodson
Racial Discrimination Evidence 1.1:
Allowing the defendant to bring someone completely irrelevant to the case to argue for her at the capacity of her attorney, in a small claims case
During the trial, the defendant seldom spoke, except at the end, when Judge William Dodson asked her, do you have anything to add to what he said? The ‘he’ being the defendant’s brother, who has no role in contract involved, but did virtually all the talking for the defendant during the trial. Please note that this is a small claims court and everyone has to represent herself/himself.
The defendant is an attorney herself. Instead of having to defend herself, she was allowed by Judge William Dodson to have her brother defend her as her lawyer. Also, has her brother passed the bar exam yet? If not, could he legally act as an attorney?
Racial Discrimination Evidence 1.2:
Allowing the defendant to ignore the subpoena completely without any explanations, verbal or written
The defendant was served subpoena which requires her to bring documents relevant to the case. The defendant completely ignored it and brought none of the documents, with no explanations, verbal or written
Racial Discrimination Evidence 1.3:
Allowing the defendant’ counterclaim to stand without being served in time.
The defendant served the plaintiff a counterclaim notice 6 days before the trial. When the plaintiff pointed out that the counterclaim should be voided since it was not served in a timely manner, Judge William Dodson said he would allow it and if the plaintiff was not happy about it, the plaintiff would have to ask for a continuance. Notice the ridiculous logic of Judge William Dodson here, he is asking the plaintiff to do something so as to help make the defendant’s counterclaim legitimate.
Racial Discrimination Evidence 1.4:
Allowing the defendant to interrupt the plaintiff frequently
Judge William Dodson allowed the defendant’s brother and the defendant to make offensive comments and noise while the plaintiff was speaking but warned sternly the plaintiff not to speak when the plaintiff asked for permission to speak.
Racial Discrimination Evidence 5:
Allowing the defendant to ignore the plaintiff’s request of evidence
The defendant’s brother claimed the delivery of itemized statement within 21 days of my move-out. The plaintiff immediately asked for evidence. The request was simply ignored by Judge William Dodson.
Racial Discrimination Evidence 5
Per Judge William Dodson’s judgment letter, it is apparent that he ignored all the evidence provided by the plaintiff and come up with new evidence himself trying to disprove what the plaintiff showed. The problem is, the evidence he came up with is either completely irrelevant or in direct contrast to what he concluded.
Judge William Dodson based his judgment largely on two online articles he cited. The first article is completely irrelevant. Citing the second article, Judge William Dodson’s concluded the following:
“Mold spores are everywhere and are not harmful to healthy persons.”
Needless to say, the article did not indicate anything near what he said.
Judge William Dodson’s logic is apparently wrong and laughably so. If his logic is right, he can say the same thing about bacteria and virus. I am sure Judge William Dodson would not mind contributing to humankind by taking inhalations of various types of bacteria, virus, and mold as a subject in toxicity experiments. He will be the best subject human race has ever found since he would not be harmed, regardless of what types of the bacteria, virus, and mold he inhales and at what density.
Judge William Dodson deliberately ignores all the evidence of the toxicity of the specific molds found in the inspection report. Both the mold inspection report of the house and a literature review the plaintiff produced has provided made it crystal clear that the specific molds found in high density in the house are toxic and cause diseases.
Judge William Dodson deliberately ignored the basic numbers in the case. After the plaintiff left, the defendant spent 5 months to find a new tenant. After the new tenant left, the defendant spent 7 months looking for tenants but the moldy house is still vacant in the trial. If the plaintiff is responsible for anything, it would be that the plaintiff should be rewarded for shortening the tenant search time by 2 months. Instead, Judge William Dodson demanded that the plaintiff pays more than 10 thousand dollars for lost rent.
One can surely interpret Judge William Dodson’s misreading of evidence as gross incompetence or lack of due diligence, just like that of the traffic court judge who delegated his job to his clerk. While the traffic court judge was in chambers, the clerk heard pleas and imposed sentences. That traffic court judge was one of the 43 California judges reprimanded for misconduct in 2014. However, incompetence and lack of due diligence might not be the full story.
In fact, neither the defendant’s brother nor the defendant ever denied the toxicity of the molds found in the house in the trial. They did tell that lie, two years ago, when they stood outside of the moldy house trying to stop the plaintiff from moving out. (the lie was audio recorded) In all fairness, the lie told by these two was a lesser version than the one told by Judge William Dodson. They just said that the molds found in their moldy house were not harmful. The plaintiff later emailed the defendant asking her to give reference to what she said, she denied she ever said that in email. Even the defendant realized it was a lie that can be easily caught, while Judge William Dodson, a judge, told it in writing. Why? Did Judge William Dodson get this idea from the defendant in a private conversation? Is there any conflict of interest involved? Or is it the plain old racial discrimination?
Summary
The society owes the next generation a safe place to grow up. If we cannot make sure to rip the world of baby killers, we can at least see to it that there is this precious public good call legal justice, whereupon baby killers cannot easily get away with profiting at the expense of baby death.
Judge William Dodson is damaging this public good with his racial discrimination. Small claims court was made available so that people with less resource available to them can also afford justice. Judge William Dodson is stopping that justice from serving people. Judge William Dodson should be removed from his position.
In what follows, we cite a story from the history of medical science, to put in perspective, the damage Judge William Dodson can do to the society, if we don’t stop him.
There are two competing logics:
Logic 1: You can let the baby take a drug until it is proved toxic
Logic 2: You should let the baby take a drug only when it is proved safe
At this stage of history, common sense demands Logic2. However, in what follows, we will show the hefty price the society has paid to learn Logic 2 and abandon Logic 1.
In 1960, while the sedative Kevadon (Thalidomide), made in Europe, had already been sold to pregnant women in Europe for morning sickness, Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey refuses to sign it off for the following reason:
Although the manufacturer has provided evidence that the drug is safe for the pregnant mom, it has not proved that it is safe for the fetus.
Richardson-Merrell, the seller of the drug, put enormous pressure on Dr. Kelsey. Fortunately, she was proved right--- years later, Europeans found that Kevadon results in baby deformation: limbs fail to develop properly, in some cases also eyes, ears, and internal organs. No one knows how many miscarriages the drug caused, but it's estimated that, in Germany alone, 10,000 babies were born affected by Thalidomide.
Congress bestowed on Dr. Kelsey a medal for service to humanity and passed legislation requiring drug makers to prove that new products were safe and effective before marketing them. President John F. Kennedy signed the landmark law that she had inspired and presented her with the nation’s highest federal civilian service award.
Logic 1 is the logic of the drug company that was about to profit in the expense of the baby.
Logic 2 is the logic of Dr. Kelsey, who saves babies.
Congress confirms that Logic2 is to replace Logic1.
The society thanks people like Dr. Kelsey for saving baby lives.
Judge William Dodson’s racial discrimination or/and gross negligence is about to undo all that.