Below is my response to an unsigned letter by a security mutual insurance company employee. The sole reason for not signing a letter is to permit the writer the opportunity to deny collusion and/or liability in a potentially criminal act. Of course, it is possible that perhaps the most conniving and most profitable corporate entities could forget to sign such an important letter. However, this executive’s failure to respond to my direct accusation is what is called a statement against interest. The reason for this rule of evidence is that no innocent human being would allow an accusation of wrong doing pass without a denial. No doubt, i will hear from this corporate lackey in an attempt to ameliorate her statement against interest. Below is my last letter to security mutual insurance company, dated september 29, 2015, which has not been responded to despite its overwhelming evidence of security’s wrongdoing. By the way, i have paid security on three to four house policies At the same time) for more than twenty years and during all of that time i had one minor claim regarding damage caused by a tree falling on a barn on one of my properties. I believe the total payment was around $3,500.
In any event, my hope is that anyone who has suffered a similar ripoff to mine, will write about it and perhaps we will receive a real consumer protection agency instead of the pathetic department of insurance. I will add an email to this complaint as soon as i file my complaint in the federal court. The letter follows:
Security Mutual Insurance Co Reviews
Below is my response to an unsigned letter by a security mutual insurance company employee. The sole reason for not signing a letter is to permit the writer the opportunity to deny collusion and/or liability in a potentially criminal act. Of course, it is possible that perhaps the most conniving and most profitable corporate entities could forget to sign such an important letter. However, this executive’s failure to respond to my direct accusation is what is called a statement against interest. The reason for this rule of evidence is that no innocent human being would allow an accusation of wrong doing pass without a denial. No doubt, i will hear from this corporate lackey in an attempt to ameliorate her statement against interest. Below is my last letter to security mutual insurance company, dated september 29, 2015, which has not been responded to despite its overwhelming evidence of security’s wrongdoing. By the way, i have paid security on three to four house policies At the same time) for more than twenty years and during all of that time i had one minor claim regarding damage caused by a tree falling on a barn on one of my properties. I believe the total payment was around $3,500.
In any event, my hope is that anyone who has suffered a similar ripoff to mine, will write about it and perhaps we will receive a real consumer protection agency instead of the pathetic department of insurance. I will add an email to this complaint as soon as i file my complaint in the federal court. The letter follows:
Security mutual insurance company