Saxon Law Group offers a debt relief program, which I believe violated the Debt relief sevices act of 2010 by the F.T.C . This debt relief program charges a retainer fee and service fees before a settlement or negotiation has been reached with the creditors. I believe that they misrepresent their services as a legal service. A telemarketer with FSB or Financial Strength Builders Education named Byron Lev claimed Saxon Law Group is a law firm in this text: "have you made a decision about getting help from our law firm ? Please call and let me know what you are going to do. Byron 855 816 6864 #312." I believe Byron Lev misrepresented the services provided by Saxon Law Group and gave inaccurate and deceptive information, which enticed me to sign with the contract. They also state they are a Law firm on their website. Parisa Fishback is said to be the principle attorney on the website: saxonlawgroup.com/about.html This report is to give a heads up they will take any money you send into the trust account they set up for you.
I paid two payments of $659.57 and cancelled my sevices with Saxon Law Group April 2018. April 16th 2018 a reimbursement from Saxon by a label RAM for $446.22 in my checking account. They sent me an email with a termination letter: "Please note that the retainer fee has been earned by the work of our attorneys. Furthermore, based upon a review of your file, we believe that the costs have also been earned." Their fee and costs for services before any negotiation or settlement was made accumulated to $872.92 Saxon Law Group partially refunded my checking account from the escrow trust fund, but violated Federal Trade Commission's Debt relief services Act of 2010 The negotiation of debt settlement is handled by third-party whom they hire. In their contract they also say that attorneys will not be retained for court appearances and that additional fees for court would be charged if something like a summons were to occur. They violated the debt relief services Act of 2010 which states: Starting on October 27, 2010, for-profit companies that sell debt relief services over the telephone may no longer charge a fee before they settle or reduce a customer’s credit card or other unsecured debt. "At the FTC we strive every day to make sure America’s middle class families get straight deals for their dollars,” Chairman Jon Leibowitz said. "This rule will stop companies who offer consumers false promises of reducing credit card debts by half or more in exchange for large, up-front fees. Too many of these companies pick the last dollar out of consumers’ pockets – and far from leaving them better off, push them deeper into debt, even bankruptcy.” Three other Telemarketing Sales Rule provisions to take effect on September 27, 2010, will: require debt relief companies to make specific disclosures to consumers; prohibit them from making misrepresentations; and extend the Telemarketing Sales Rule to cover calls consumers make to these firms in response to debt relief advertising. The Final Rule covers telemarketers of for-profit debt relief services, including credit counseling, debt settlement, and debt negotiation services. The Final Rule does not cover nonprofit firms, but does cover companies that falsely claim nonprofit status.
Over the past decade, the FTC and state enforcers have brought a combined 259 cases to stop deceptive and abusive practices by debt relief providers that have targeted consumers in financial distress. Advance Fee Ban The Final Rule contains specific requirements for debt relief providers related to charging an advance fee before providing any services. It specifies that fees for debt relief services may not be collected until: the debt relief service successfully renegotiates, settles, reduces, or otherwise changes the terms of at least one of the consumer’s debts; there is a written settlement agreement, debt management plan, or other agreement between the consumer and the creditor, and the consumer has agreed to it; and the consumer has made at least one payment to the creditor as a result of the agreement negotiated by the debt relief provider. To ensure that debt relief providers do not front-load their fees if a consumer has enrolled multiple debts in one debt relief program, the Final Rule specifies how debt relief providers can collect their fee for each settled debt. First, the provider’s fee for a single debt must be in proportion to the total fee that would be charged if all of the debts had been settled. Alternatively, if the provider bases its fee on the percentage of what the consumer saves as result of using its services, the percentage charged must be the same for each of the consumer’s debts. Dedicated Account for Fees and Savings Another new provision of the Final Rule will allow debt relief companies to require that consumers set aside their fees and savings for payment to creditors in a "dedicated account.” However, providers may only require a dedicated account as long as five conditions are met: the dedicated account is maintained at an insured financial institution; the consumer owns the funds (including any interest accrued); the consumer can withdraw the funds at any time without penalty; the provider does not own or control or have any affiliation with the company administering the account; and the provider does not exchange any referral fees with the company administering the account. Disclosures and Prohibited Misrepresentations Under the Final Rule, providers will have to make several disclosures when telemarketing their services to consumers.
Before the consumer signs up for any debt relief service, providers must disclose fundamental aspects of their services, including how long it will take for consumers to see results, how much it will cost, the negative consequences that could result from using debt relief services, and key information about dedicated accounts if they choose to require them. The Final Rule also prohibits misrepresentations about any debt relief service, including success rates and whether the provider is a nonprofit entity. The FTC’s Statement of Basis and Purpose, which accompanies the Final Rule, provides extensive guidance about the evidence providers must have to make advertising claims commonly used in selling debt relief services. The Rulemaking Process In August 2009, the FTC published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking proposing amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule and requesting public comments. Over 300 commenters, representing a wide variety of stakeholders, submitted comments in response. The Commission also held a public forum on the proposed amendments on November 4, 2009. The FTC developed the Final Rule based on the public comments, the record of the public forum and the FTC’s September 2008 Workshop on the debt settlement industry, recent testimony before Congress, and law enforcement actions brought by the Commission and the states. Information for Businesses Today, the FTC staff issued a compliance guide to help businesses comply with the new debt relief rules. The compliance guide describes the key changes to the Telemarketing Sales Rule affecting debt relief services, helps businesses determine if they are covered by the new rules, details information that covered entities must disclose to customers, and discusses how fees may now be collected. It can be found at ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/marketing/bus72.pdf on the agency’s website and is linked to this press release. The FTC vote approving publication of the Federal Register notice was 4-1, with Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch voting no. The notice will be published in the Federal Register shortly, and is available now on the FTC’s website at ftc.gov/os/2010/07/R411001finalrule.pdf. The provisions of the Final Rule will take effect on September 27, with the exception of the advance fee ban provision, which will take effect on October 27. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, click: ftc.gov/ftc/complaint.shtm or call 1-877-382-4357. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,800 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. For free information on a variety of consumer topics, click http://ftc.gov/bcp/consumer.shtm. (FTC File No. R411001) (Debt Services.final)
This company will desteoy your credit and take 2/3 of any payment you make to them for themselves. They do nothing to pay your debt. This is a huge scam. Do not fall prey to this company and do a lot of checking before getting into anything with any others. I tirned them in to bbb but I am sure nothing will come of it. Out of the 2810 i paid into it before wising up i only received 782 in return and they did a bbn solutely nothing during that time period for me. They say they will contact creditors so no longer pay those bills. Definitely do not do that. They in no way contact anyone and it affects your credit quickly.
Saxon Law Group Reviews
Saxon Law Group offers a debt relief program, which I believe violated the Debt relief sevices act of 2010 by the F.T.C . This debt relief program charges a retainer fee and service fees before a settlement or negotiation has been reached with the creditors. I believe that they misrepresent their services as a legal service. A telemarketer with FSB or Financial Strength Builders Education named Byron Lev claimed Saxon Law Group is a law firm in this text: "have you made a decision about getting help from our law firm ? Please call and let me know what you are going to do. Byron 855 816 6864 #312." I believe Byron Lev misrepresented the services provided by Saxon Law Group and gave inaccurate and deceptive information, which enticed me to sign with the contract. They also state they are a Law firm on their website. Parisa Fishback is said to be the principle attorney on the website: saxonlawgroup.com/about.html This report is to give a heads up they will take any money you send into the trust account they set up for you.
I paid two payments of $659.57 and cancelled my sevices with Saxon Law Group April 2018. April 16th 2018 a reimbursement from Saxon by a label RAM for $446.22 in my checking account. They sent me an email with a termination letter: "Please note that the retainer fee has been earned by the work of our attorneys. Furthermore, based upon a review of your file, we believe that the costs have also been earned." Their fee and costs for services before any negotiation or settlement was made accumulated to $872.92 Saxon Law Group partially refunded my checking account from the escrow trust fund, but violated Federal Trade Commission's Debt relief services Act of 2010 The negotiation of debt settlement is handled by third-party whom they hire. In their contract they also say that attorneys will not be retained for court appearances and that additional fees for court would be charged if something like a summons were to occur. They violated the debt relief services Act of 2010 which states: Starting on October 27, 2010, for-profit companies that sell debt relief services over the telephone may no longer charge a fee before they settle or reduce a customer’s credit card or other unsecured debt. "At the FTC we strive every day to make sure America’s middle class families get straight deals for their dollars,” Chairman Jon Leibowitz said. "This rule will stop companies who offer consumers false promises of reducing credit card debts by half or more in exchange for large, up-front fees. Too many of these companies pick the last dollar out of consumers’ pockets – and far from leaving them better off, push them deeper into debt, even bankruptcy.” Three other Telemarketing Sales Rule provisions to take effect on September 27, 2010, will: require debt relief companies to make specific disclosures to consumers; prohibit them from making misrepresentations; and extend the Telemarketing Sales Rule to cover calls consumers make to these firms in response to debt relief advertising. The Final Rule covers telemarketers of for-profit debt relief services, including credit counseling, debt settlement, and debt negotiation services. The Final Rule does not cover nonprofit firms, but does cover companies that falsely claim nonprofit status.
Over the past decade, the FTC and state enforcers have brought a combined 259 cases to stop deceptive and abusive practices by debt relief providers that have targeted consumers in financial distress. Advance Fee Ban The Final Rule contains specific requirements for debt relief providers related to charging an advance fee before providing any services. It specifies that fees for debt relief services may not be collected until: the debt relief service successfully renegotiates, settles, reduces, or otherwise changes the terms of at least one of the consumer’s debts; there is a written settlement agreement, debt management plan, or other agreement between the consumer and the creditor, and the consumer has agreed to it; and the consumer has made at least one payment to the creditor as a result of the agreement negotiated by the debt relief provider. To ensure that debt relief providers do not front-load their fees if a consumer has enrolled multiple debts in one debt relief program, the Final Rule specifies how debt relief providers can collect their fee for each settled debt. First, the provider’s fee for a single debt must be in proportion to the total fee that would be charged if all of the debts had been settled. Alternatively, if the provider bases its fee on the percentage of what the consumer saves as result of using its services, the percentage charged must be the same for each of the consumer’s debts. Dedicated Account for Fees and Savings Another new provision of the Final Rule will allow debt relief companies to require that consumers set aside their fees and savings for payment to creditors in a "dedicated account.” However, providers may only require a dedicated account as long as five conditions are met: the dedicated account is maintained at an insured financial institution; the consumer owns the funds (including any interest accrued); the consumer can withdraw the funds at any time without penalty; the provider does not own or control or have any affiliation with the company administering the account; and the provider does not exchange any referral fees with the company administering the account. Disclosures and Prohibited Misrepresentations Under the Final Rule, providers will have to make several disclosures when telemarketing their services to consumers.
Before the consumer signs up for any debt relief service, providers must disclose fundamental aspects of their services, including how long it will take for consumers to see results, how much it will cost, the negative consequences that could result from using debt relief services, and key information about dedicated accounts if they choose to require them. The Final Rule also prohibits misrepresentations about any debt relief service, including success rates and whether the provider is a nonprofit entity. The FTC’s Statement of Basis and Purpose, which accompanies the Final Rule, provides extensive guidance about the evidence providers must have to make advertising claims commonly used in selling debt relief services. The Rulemaking Process In August 2009, the FTC published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking proposing amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule and requesting public comments. Over 300 commenters, representing a wide variety of stakeholders, submitted comments in response. The Commission also held a public forum on the proposed amendments on November 4, 2009. The FTC developed the Final Rule based on the public comments, the record of the public forum and the FTC’s September 2008 Workshop on the debt settlement industry, recent testimony before Congress, and law enforcement actions brought by the Commission and the states. Information for Businesses Today, the FTC staff issued a compliance guide to help businesses comply with the new debt relief rules. The compliance guide describes the key changes to the Telemarketing Sales Rule affecting debt relief services, helps businesses determine if they are covered by the new rules, details information that covered entities must disclose to customers, and discusses how fees may now be collected. It can be found at ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/marketing/bus72.pdf on the agency’s website and is linked to this press release. The FTC vote approving publication of the Federal Register notice was 4-1, with Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch voting no. The notice will be published in the Federal Register shortly, and is available now on the FTC’s website at ftc.gov/os/2010/07/R411001finalrule.pdf. The provisions of the Final Rule will take effect on September 27, with the exception of the advance fee ban provision, which will take effect on October 27. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, click: ftc.gov/ftc/complaint.shtm or call 1-877-382-4357. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,800 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. For free information on a variety of consumer topics, click http://ftc.gov/bcp/consumer.shtm. (FTC File No. R411001) (Debt Services.final)
Thieves
This company will desteoy your credit and take 2/3 of any payment you make to them for themselves. They do nothing to pay your debt. This is a huge scam. Do not fall prey to this company and do a lot of checking before getting into anything with any others. I tirned them in to bbb but I am sure nothing will come of it. Out of the 2810 i paid into it before wising up i only received 782 in return and they did a bbn solutely nothing during that time period for me. They say they will contact creditors so no longer pay those bills. Definitely do not do that. They in no way contact anyone and it affects your credit quickly.