He was hired as an expert and also assigned by the court to do therapy. I paid for months and months of appointments all to have things made worse and not better.
He allowed months and months to go by and really did nothing that was of any help. He then went to court 2 times and did not present everything in a factual manner. Over many months he would speak to one side and tell them one thing and then the other side and say another until no one knew what was really being done.
While I felt he was there to help I have found out that he is more worried about not getting referrals from the court system. He would be asked to report things that were never reported and tell people he was sending letters that were never once sent. He just did everything to hinder things and allowed months to go by between appointments.
They should never allow someone like this to treat families and claim to be an expert when he clearly did not do anything but say walk away from each other. What kind of person gives that advice when you are talking about kids.
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
In this case, the Arbitrator had evidence submitted by both the Complainant and the Author to consider. The evidence submitted included yscam Arbitration Statement, Complainant’s Witness Statements, and supporting documentation, as well as the Author’s Response, Author’s Witness Statement, and Author’s Supporting Documents.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
Samuel Romirowsky, PhD Reviews
He was hired as an expert and also assigned by the court to do therapy. I paid for months and months of appointments all to have things made worse and not better.
He allowed months and months to go by and really did nothing that was of any help. He then went to court 2 times and did not present everything in a factual manner. Over many months he would speak to one side and tell them one thing and then the other side and say another until no one knew what was really being done.
While I felt he was there to help I have found out that he is more worried about not getting referrals from the court system. He would be asked to report things that were never reported and tell people he was sending letters that were never once sent. He just did everything to hinder things and allowed months to go by between appointments.
They should never allow someone like this to treat families and claim to be an expert when he clearly did not do anything but say walk away from each other. What kind of person gives that advice when you are talking about kids.
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
In this case, the Arbitrator had evidence submitted by both the Complainant and the Author to consider. The evidence submitted included yscam Arbitration Statement, Complainant’s Witness Statements, and supporting documentation, as well as the Author’s Response, Author’s Witness Statement, and Author’s Supporting Documents.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.