Ray White Paddington were found guilty in the Brisbane Supreme Court of false advertising and deceptive conduct under the trade practices act after marketing an appartment as having 3 parking spaces the apparent only had 2 parking spots and a storage are they told the buyer the concrete support pillar could be removed to create a third parking space which was not true as it was a structural support pillar and could not be removed.
Ray White Paddington we’re convicted of breaching the trade practices act and ordered to pay the buyer $312.000 plus legal costs the appeal by Ray White Paddington in the appeals court was dismissed.
Ray White Paddington Reviews
Ray White Paddington were found guilty in the Brisbane Supreme Court of false advertising and deceptive conduct under the trade practices act after marketing an appartment as having 3 parking spaces the apparent only had 2 parking spots and a storage are they told the buyer the concrete support pillar could be removed to create a third parking space which was not true as it was a structural support pillar and could not be removed.
Ray White Paddington we’re convicted of breaching the trade practices act and ordered to pay the buyer $312.000 plus legal costs the appeal by Ray White Paddington in the appeals court was dismissed.