Please observe the present state of play Re a case No C6558/2013 with the VCAT in Melbourne Australia Against the shoddy shonky and unscrupulous businessman Innovation Square one man show Tjhin Franky pronounced as GIN by him over a favoured telephone hook-up arranged by the VCAT-Civil in Australia whilst discriminating against me unable cope with or handle the truth to meet with fairness.
Ref: C6558/2013 Self discriminated and humiliated whilst businessman JIN Favoured in Procedure & Judgement by the Victorian Civil & Admin Tribunal. The following are extracts of my most communications with VCAT-Civil in Melbourne Australia.
The businessman Tjhin Franky was allowed two postponements of the hearing in case No C6558/2013.
I was discriminated against initially not being given a postponement to attend another court matter Re malicious Licence less driver’s damage to my motor vehicle in Dandenong Magistrates court in deliberately fixing the hearing date the very date I requested the VCAT-civil to avoid in a 2 week period. On further pleadings and seeking of media help Re the partisan, partiality shown to the defendant by the Vic-Police and the VCAT-Civil it was postponed apparently with collusion between them. The VCAT-Civil Member J Kefford with the help of the Registrar M Sotto over-ruled Senior member Barker and permitted a telephone hook-up at hearing and judging member R Buchanan acted as the defence council and dismissed the case to favour the respondent whilst trying hard to render greater favours for the Respondent. There were missing documentations and wastefully re-printed documents in two folios of about 4 to 5 inches thick. R Buchannan refused to examining the documents in a USB storage device that I presented and refused to grant an adjournment to the hearing acting with total partiality and favours’ to the Respondent that gives the impression that there is much waste and corruption within the VCAT- civil that need to be brought before the newly created Independent Broad based Commission against corruption in the State of Victoria. The hearing and judging member Buchanan did not trouble himself to call the Interstate transport company or the driver who made three attempts to deliver the item in question but all the time acted as if he had already a prior arrangement with the Responding Defendant selectively using his false assertions to buttress his favoured judgement to him with hardly any regard for the truth or fairness. When the Rip-off, complaint pertaining to the defendant was shown to the member hearing the case R. Buchanan; he ignored it and was determined to favour Jin that I have lost all confidence in VCAT-Civil along with experiences with other involvement at the VCAT from even earlier periods. The Australian media has a great role to play unless it too is failing the public only to serve other smaller and larger business and Govt establishments to the detriment of the ordinary man in the street in failing to investigate and expose the waste corruption within VCAT-Civil.
Please observe this thread of communications with the VCAT-Civil and note how wasteful, incompetent, dishonest and incapable of handing the truth and serving the Vic Public the VCAT-Civil is demonstrating and exposing itself when sending this email of not being able to handle attachment when member R Buchanan has displayed great partiality and utter disregard for the truth and fairness in dismissing the case on the 22nd of April 2014 with only one my sister’s only being a witness to this wasteful, corrupt partiality displayed by a Tax-payer funded institution in the state of Victoria n Australia. Will the IBAC and/or the media take note of this and initiate an inquiry to better serve the people of Victoria?
ProductReview.com.au Pty. Ltd. Reviews
Please observe the present state of play Re a case No C6558/2013 with the VCAT in Melbourne Australia Against the shoddy shonky and unscrupulous businessman Innovation Square one man show Tjhin Franky pronounced as GIN by him over a favoured telephone hook-up arranged by the VCAT-Civil in Australia whilst discriminating against me unable cope with or handle the truth to meet with fairness.
Ref: C6558/2013 Self discriminated and humiliated whilst businessman JIN Favoured in Procedure & Judgement by the Victorian Civil & Admin Tribunal. The following are extracts of my most communications with VCAT-Civil in Melbourne Australia.
The businessman Tjhin Franky was allowed two postponements of the hearing in case No C6558/2013.
I was discriminated against initially not being given a postponement to attend another court matter Re malicious Licence less driver’s damage to my motor vehicle in Dandenong Magistrates court in deliberately fixing the hearing date the very date I requested the VCAT-civil to avoid in a 2 week period. On further pleadings and seeking of media help Re the partisan, partiality shown to the defendant by the Vic-Police and the VCAT-Civil it was postponed apparently with collusion between them. The VCAT-Civil Member J Kefford with the help of the Registrar M Sotto over-ruled Senior member Barker and permitted a telephone hook-up at hearing and judging member R Buchanan acted as the defence council and dismissed the case to favour the respondent whilst trying hard to render greater favours for the Respondent. There were missing documentations and wastefully re-printed documents in two folios of about 4 to 5 inches thick. R Buchannan refused to examining the documents in a USB storage device that I presented and refused to grant an adjournment to the hearing acting with total partiality and favours’ to the Respondent that gives the impression that there is much waste and corruption within the VCAT- civil that need to be brought before the newly created Independent Broad based Commission against corruption in the State of Victoria. The hearing and judging member Buchanan did not trouble himself to call the Interstate transport company or the driver who made three attempts to deliver the item in question but all the time acted as if he had already a prior arrangement with the Responding Defendant selectively using his false assertions to buttress his favoured judgement to him with hardly any regard for the truth or fairness. When the Rip-off, complaint pertaining to the defendant was shown to the member hearing the case R. Buchanan; he ignored it and was determined to favour Jin that I have lost all confidence in VCAT-Civil along with experiences with other involvement at the VCAT from even earlier periods. The Australian media has a great role to play unless it too is failing the public only to serve other smaller and larger business and Govt establishments to the detriment of the ordinary man in the street in failing to investigate and expose the waste corruption within VCAT-Civil.
Please observe this thread of communications with the VCAT-Civil and note how wasteful, incompetent, dishonest and incapable of handing the truth and serving the Vic Public the VCAT-Civil is demonstrating and exposing itself when sending this email of not being able to handle attachment when member R Buchanan has displayed great partiality and utter disregard for the truth and fairness in dismissing the case on the 22nd of April 2014 with only one my sister’s only being a witness to this wasteful, corrupt partiality displayed by a Tax-payer funded institution in the state of Victoria n Australia. Will the IBAC and/or the media take note of this and initiate an inquiry to better serve the people of Victoria?
Mahulchandran(Mal).C.Spencer