Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance Reviews
Most Useful Comment
Mar 14, 2016
THEY ARE IN VIOLATION OF A FAIR HEARING WHICH WAS DECIDED BY THE NEW YORK STATE OFFFICE OF TEMPORARY AND DISABILITY ASSISTANCE BY A DARLA P.OTO THE COMMISSIONER'S DESIGNEE. BASED ON A JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 22 OF THE NEW YORK STATE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW (HEREINAFTER SOCIAL SERVICES LAW) AND PART 35E OF TITLE 18 NYCRR. HEREINAFTER REGULATIONS), A FAIR HEARING WAS HELD ON NOVEMBER 24. 2015, BEFORE A JOHN VESEY, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE. THE FOLLOWING PERSONS APPEARED AT THE HEARING. THE DECISION AND ORDER: THE DETERMINATION OF THE AGENCY TO REDUCE THE APPELLANT'S SNAP BENEFITS WITHOUT NOTICE IS NOT CORRECT AND IS REVERSED. 1. THE AGENCY IS DIRECTED TO RESTORE THE APPELLANT'S SNAP BENEFITS RETROACTIVE TO OCTOBER 1, 2015, THE DATE THE APPELLANT'S SNAP BENEFITS WERE REDUCED.
2. SHOULD THE AGENCY IN THE FUTURE DETERMINE TO IMPLEMENT ITS PREVIOUS ACTION, IT IS DIRECTED TO ISSUE A TIMELY AND ADEQUATE NOTICE OF INTENT. AS REQUIRED BY 18 NYCRR 358*6.4, THE AGENCY MUST COMPLY IMMEDIATELY WITH THE DIRECTIVES SET FORTH ABOVE.
WHICH THEY DIDNT REPLY AS DIRECTED WHICH THEIR ARE INTENT OF THE LAW WHICH THIS AGENCY VOILATE!!
Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance Reviews
THEY ARE IN VIOLATION OF A FAIR HEARING WHICH WAS DECIDED BY THE NEW YORK STATE OFFFICE OF TEMPORARY AND DISABILITY ASSISTANCE BY A DARLA P.OTO THE COMMISSIONER'S DESIGNEE. BASED ON A JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 22 OF THE NEW YORK STATE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW (HEREINAFTER SOCIAL SERVICES LAW) AND PART 35E OF TITLE 18 NYCRR. HEREINAFTER REGULATIONS), A FAIR HEARING WAS HELD ON NOVEMBER 24. 2015, BEFORE A JOHN VESEY, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE. THE FOLLOWING PERSONS APPEARED AT THE HEARING. THE DECISION AND ORDER: THE DETERMINATION OF THE AGENCY TO REDUCE THE APPELLANT'S SNAP BENEFITS WITHOUT NOTICE IS NOT CORRECT AND IS REVERSED. 1. THE AGENCY IS DIRECTED TO RESTORE THE APPELLANT'S SNAP BENEFITS RETROACTIVE TO OCTOBER 1, 2015, THE DATE THE APPELLANT'S SNAP BENEFITS WERE REDUCED.
2. SHOULD THE AGENCY IN THE FUTURE DETERMINE TO IMPLEMENT ITS PREVIOUS ACTION, IT IS DIRECTED TO ISSUE A TIMELY AND ADEQUATE NOTICE OF INTENT. AS REQUIRED BY 18 NYCRR 358*6.4, THE AGENCY MUST COMPLY IMMEDIATELY WITH THE DIRECTIVES SET FORTH ABOVE.
WHICH THEY DIDNT REPLY AS DIRECTED WHICH THEIR ARE INTENT OF THE LAW WHICH THIS AGENCY VOILATE!!
CAROL, BROOKLYN NEW YORK