Complainant great basin mining and exploration corp. The “complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements. The author contends the complainant has misled investors regarding investments in gold mining. The complainant denies the allegations and contends the author is a former disgruntled investor. The author did not provide a response to this matter. Therefore, in accordance with the outscam, the author waived their right to participate in this arbitration. By submitting a report and a complaint on the outscam websites, both the complainant and the author have agreed to submit the dispute to the outscam program.
In accordance with the rules, the arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
Each statement challenged by the complainant has been considered, together with any witness statements and documents provided by the complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the statement. The author did not provide a response to the complaint.
The arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the report were false. Therefore, according to the vip arbitration rules, those statements have been redacted.
Noble Technologies Corp Reviews
Complainant great basin mining and exploration corp. The “complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements. The author contends the complainant has misled investors regarding investments in gold mining. The complainant denies the allegations and contends the author is a former disgruntled investor. The author did not provide a response to this matter. Therefore, in accordance with the outscam, the author waived their right to participate in this arbitration. By submitting a report and a complaint on the outscam websites, both the complainant and the author have agreed to submit the dispute to the outscam program.
In accordance with the rules, the arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
Each statement challenged by the complainant has been considered, together with any witness statements and documents provided by the complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the statement. The author did not provide a response to the complaint.
The arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the report were false. Therefore, according to the vip arbitration rules, those statements have been redacted.