Eugene Riccio - NOTHING ADDED UP OR MADE SENSE: I hired Eugene Riccio to defend my son. My son & girlfriend were set up by corrupt police who threw phony charges at him to protect their C.I., The C.I. (convicted rapist) who they were dealing drugs with!
My son & girlfriend were enticed to his (C.I.) home - under the guise of getting paid back money she had loaned him when he (the C.I.) was desperate. The C.I. had gang members waiting and were going to use the girlfriend as sexual payback for a debt he (C.I.) owed the gang - they did not know my son was with her - so they robbed them at knife point & left.
Instead of charging the CI & the gang members waiting inside for the attack - the police threw a slew of charges at my son - I guess to protect their illicit operations. (I have a friend at the FBI now investigating the police) The D.A. in his first offer threw out all but one minor charge - I guess to save face and to protect the police from a lawsuit.
In our first meeting with Riccio - we were told he read in the witness statements & that my son was implicated by a witness statement, so Riccio presumed my son guilty and based his defense on this. We read the statements - The statement DID NOT EXIST - I asked Riccio to show us the statement - he in a loud voice said he read it so it must exist - yet could not find it to show us.
Instead we were told (I paraphrase) "This is how it works - They make an offer - we counter" However after the DA's first offer of dropping all charges - Riccio never made a counter offer - he told us he was so surprised by the offer - That he didn’t go there - no time!!! - I actually listened at the bottom of steps below the conference room – they never even discussed the case!!
This went on for months - I asked numerous times for him to counter - even with a heated face to face on the court house steps - it never happened - I finally in court during proceedings got up from the gallery and handed a note to the DA - asking him to tell MY ATTORNEY RICCIO - The condemning statements did not exist - he did so - in front of a very puzzled Judge.
I fired Riccio shortly thereafter as he continued in my mind to be playing ball & sacrificing my son to the system in Lynchfield. There are other terms that are applicable in my mind to what was seemingly going on in this court and the relationships.....the DA later even asked Riccio if he minded if he gave our new attorney a better deal! - The crime scene was pristine – NO INDICATION anything even happened!
Police report & timeline was impossible - based on real circumstances & logic – could not have happened!! -Witness accounts all contradicted each other MOST OF ALL - IN A LATER ADDENDUM FROM THE DA – THE D.A. STATED "The charges were UNFOUNDED in court & PROBABLY MADE UP)!!! - this came well after an unfavorable ruling in this court went unchallenged and got my son an unjust sentence, & sent to a dangerous facility and deprived of medication he desperately needed.
Riccio just said go to trial and come up with more money - risky given the initial charges to take a chance on with my son’s life and I was out of money. Did no investigation, In lieu of suing for malpractice or incompetent or inadequate defense - I asked for the return of my money for the suffering that this led to for my son & me - never got a response.
What went on in Lynchfield - I would still like a full explanation. It reeks of something untoward & worse. I asked if playing ball was a way to get more cases and not piss off D.A.'s or cops was how things were done in Lynchfield to get more business, again no reply. We went thru hell and money for a case that was phony and corrupt. I'd like our money back.
Law Offices of Eugene J. Riccio Reviews
Double crossing RAT
Eugene Riccio is a liar and a thief! He’s a pathetic double crossing rat, who deserves to be disbarred! A pure scumbag
Eugene Riccio - NOTHING ADDED UP OR MADE SENSE: I hired Eugene Riccio to defend my son. My son & girlfriend were set up by corrupt police who threw phony charges at him to protect their C.I., The C.I. (convicted rapist) who they were dealing drugs with!
My son & girlfriend were enticed to his (C.I.) home - under the guise of getting paid back money she had loaned him when he (the C.I.) was desperate. The C.I. had gang members waiting and were going to use the girlfriend as sexual payback for a debt he (C.I.) owed the gang - they did not know my son was with her - so they robbed them at knife point & left.
Instead of charging the CI & the gang members waiting inside for the attack - the police threw a slew of charges at my son - I guess to protect their illicit operations. (I have a friend at the FBI now investigating the police) The D.A. in his first offer threw out all but one minor charge - I guess to save face and to protect the police from a lawsuit.
In our first meeting with Riccio - we were told he read in the witness statements & that my son was implicated by a witness statement, so Riccio presumed my son guilty and based his defense on this. We read the statements - The statement DID NOT EXIST - I asked Riccio to show us the statement - he in a loud voice said he read it so it must exist - yet could not find it to show us.
Instead we were told (I paraphrase) "This is how it works - They make an offer - we counter" However after the DA's first offer of dropping all charges - Riccio never made a counter offer - he told us he was so surprised by the offer - That he didn’t go there - no time!!! - I actually listened at the bottom of steps below the conference room – they never even discussed the case!!
This went on for months - I asked numerous times for him to counter - even with a heated face to face on the court house steps - it never happened - I finally in court during proceedings got up from the gallery and handed a note to the DA - asking him to tell MY ATTORNEY RICCIO - The condemning statements did not exist - he did so - in front of a very puzzled Judge.
I fired Riccio shortly thereafter as he continued in my mind to be playing ball & sacrificing my son to the system in Lynchfield. There are other terms that are applicable in my mind to what was seemingly going on in this court and the relationships.....the DA later even asked Riccio if he minded if he gave our new attorney a better deal! - The crime scene was pristine – NO INDICATION anything even happened!
Police report & timeline was impossible - based on real circumstances & logic – could not have happened!! -Witness accounts all contradicted each other MOST OF ALL - IN A LATER ADDENDUM FROM THE DA – THE D.A. STATED "The charges were UNFOUNDED in court & PROBABLY MADE UP)!!! - this came well after an unfavorable ruling in this court went unchallenged and got my son an unjust sentence, & sent to a dangerous facility and deprived of medication he desperately needed.
Riccio just said go to trial and come up with more money - risky given the initial charges to take a chance on with my son’s life and I was out of money. Did no investigation, In lieu of suing for malpractice or incompetent or inadequate defense - I asked for the return of my money for the suffering that this led to for my son & me - never got a response.
What went on in Lynchfield - I would still like a full explanation. It reeks of something untoward & worse. I asked if playing ball was a way to get more cases and not piss off D.A.'s or cops was how things were done in Lynchfield to get more business, again no reply. We went thru hell and money for a case that was phony and corrupt. I'd like our money back.