My divorce attorney highly recommended Dr. Kerner as a custody evaluator. I mainly agreed to use Kerner because I was falsely accused of domestic violence by my ex, and the case was so obvious that the charges were dropped within in a month without even an arraignment. I was also recently awarded $ 150,000 by the County of Santa Clara for this false arrest through mediation of a civil lawsuit that I had filed agianst the County for this unfortuante incident. Basically my ex got angry after the judge ordered him to pay temporary support and my attorney fees (a total sum of $ 80,000). The next day my ex scratched his arm and claimed that I did it. Kerner got assigned to the case after the charges were dropped and after every body including the police knew that this was a set up. To my astonishment and to my attorney's astonishment Kerner stated in his report that I attacked my ex-husband when he was filming his interactions with our 3-year-old daughter at 7:30 in the morning when she was still sleeping!! I honestly believe that Kerner knew the truth and was either intimidated or impressed by my ex's position in the society to hold him accountable for what he did.
I have no respect for this man. If you are a woman do NOT agree to have Kerner as your custody evaluator as he is highly biased toward women. I am now attending a women's support group and there are 7 other women who used Kerner, like I did, with similar false (and intentional) findings stated in their reports to favor their husbands over them for custody recommendation.
Other unethical acts that Kerner committed in my report:
1) He did not report what my children told him accurately.
2) He changed my quotes in the report.
3) He changed my therapist's quotes in the report. I shared the report with her afterwards, and she was shocked beyond belief.
4) He attributred false quotes to a marriage therapist that my ex and I had seen.
5) He overlooked disturbing recordings that my ex took of the children which clearly illustrated that he was and is mentally disturbed.
In my opinion Kerner changes facts and quotes in his reports to tell the story that he wants to tell, even after he is shown facts that strongly contradict his statements. He is not an honest man and is certainly not motivated by the best interest of the children
Kerner Evaluations Reviews
My divorce attorney highly recommended Dr. Kerner as a custody evaluator. I mainly agreed to use Kerner because I was falsely accused of domestic violence by my ex, and the case was so obvious that the charges were dropped within in a month without even an arraignment. I was also recently awarded $ 150,000 by the County of Santa Clara for this false arrest through mediation of a civil lawsuit that I had filed agianst the County for this unfortuante incident. Basically my ex got angry after the judge ordered him to pay temporary support and my attorney fees (a total sum of $ 80,000). The next day my ex scratched his arm and claimed that I did it. Kerner got assigned to the case after the charges were dropped and after every body including the police knew that this was a set up. To my astonishment and to my attorney's astonishment Kerner stated in his report that I attacked my ex-husband when he was filming his interactions with our 3-year-old daughter at 7:30 in the morning when she was still sleeping!! I honestly believe that Kerner knew the truth and was either intimidated or impressed by my ex's position in the society to hold him accountable for what he did.
I have no respect for this man. If you are a woman do NOT agree to have Kerner as your custody evaluator as he is highly biased toward women. I am now attending a women's support group and there are 7 other women who used Kerner, like I did, with similar false (and intentional) findings stated in their reports to favor their husbands over them for custody recommendation.
Other unethical acts that Kerner committed in my report:
1) He did not report what my children told him accurately.
2) He changed my quotes in the report.
3) He changed my therapist's quotes in the report. I shared the report with her afterwards, and she was shocked beyond belief.
4) He attributred false quotes to a marriage therapist that my ex and I had seen.
5) He overlooked disturbing recordings that my ex took of the children which clearly illustrated that he was and is mentally disturbed.
In my opinion Kerner changes facts and quotes in his reports to tell the story that he wants to tell, even after he is shown facts that strongly contradict his statements. He is not an honest man and is certainly not motivated by the best interest of the children