This matter involves CIV 46SMC1100317. This civil small claims suit was presented on August 30, 2011. I presented the facts, evidence, and photos accordingly. Refer to exhibits A., B., C., D., and E.. The defendant in this matter neglected his fiduciary responsibilities and under the penalty of perjury, lied in court. Overwhelming evidence presented in this small claims suit should have been rendered in my favor. There was no court reporter in this small claims civil matter. In addition, the Judge slammed a book and stormed out of the court room in the middle of a small claims civil court proceeding. The Judge rendered no final conclusion in this matter. Under the Freedom of Information Act, I have requested in writing a copy of your final verdict on 3/4/2016 by fax. In addition to this matter, this is in violation of the following:
1. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 2.3
2. South Dakota Law under 40-1. 2.4
3. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 14
4. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 27-which is a Class I Misdemeanor
5. Breach of Contract Law
6. Title 38, U. S. C., under section 701. The first violation is a $55,000 fine for theft of property of a veteran.
7. EEOC violations regarding discrimination regarding a former member of the armed services regarding discrimination which is tiered in with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 2010 under Title II
8. Veterans with Disabilities Act of 2010
10. South Dakota Law regarding theft.
11. Civil Rights Act of 1964
12. Dishonor of the court by storming out of the court room in the middle of a small claims civil suit court proceeding and rendering no final conclusion in this matter.
13. South Dakota Codified Laws under Title 16, subsection 16-19-34 regarding deceit and collusion as grounds for disbarment---Treble damages. The Treble damages are in the amount of 1890.09 at this juncture. This initial small claims suit was initiated against the defendant in the amount of 630.03.
14. War Crimes Act of 1996
15. Genocide
The United States has signed the fourth Protocol confirmed by the ICRC.
Geneva Conventions of 1949 Protocols under the 4th Treaty regarding criminal repression are as follows:
Principle I-Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.
Principle II-The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed an act from responsibility under international law.
Principle III-The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government Official does not relieve him or her from responsibility under International Law.
Principle IV-The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his/her government or of a superior does not relieve him/her from responsibility under international law, provided that a moral choice was in fact possible to him/her.
I am seeking a restitution amount of 630.03 for failure to render a judgment with relevant facts and evidence presented in this small claims civil suit. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
This information is true, accurate, and to the best of my knowledge with no intent to deceive the public at large. This information is protected under U. C. C. 1-207 and 1-308. These documents are not to be sold, distributed, or transferred to a third party without my expressed written consent. This information is protected under Title 108 and 107 of the copyright and publishing laws. Freedom of speech is secured under the Declaration of Human Rights under International Law. All rights are reserved worldwide.
Honorable Judge Michelle K. Palmer-Percy Reviews
This matter involves CIV 46SMC1100317. This civil small claims suit was presented on August 30, 2011. I presented the facts, evidence, and photos accordingly. Refer to exhibits A., B., C., D., and E.. The defendant in this matter neglected his fiduciary responsibilities and under the penalty of perjury, lied in court. Overwhelming evidence presented in this small claims suit should have been rendered in my favor. There was no court reporter in this small claims civil matter. In addition, the Judge slammed a book and stormed out of the court room in the middle of a small claims civil court proceeding. The Judge rendered no final conclusion in this matter. Under the Freedom of Information Act, I have requested in writing a copy of your final verdict on 3/4/2016 by fax. In addition to this matter, this is in violation of the following:
1. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 2.3
2. South Dakota Law under 40-1. 2.4
3. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 14
4. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 27-which is a Class I Misdemeanor
5. Breach of Contract Law
6. Title 38, U. S. C., under section 701. The first violation is a $55,000 fine for theft of property of a veteran.
7. EEOC violations regarding discrimination regarding a former member of the armed services regarding discrimination which is tiered in with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 2010 under Title II
8. Veterans with Disabilities Act of 2010
10. South Dakota Law regarding theft.
11. Civil Rights Act of 1964
12. Dishonor of the court by storming out of the court room in the middle of a small claims civil suit court proceeding and rendering no final conclusion in this matter.
13. South Dakota Codified Laws under Title 16, subsection 16-19-34 regarding deceit and collusion as grounds for disbarment---Treble damages. The Treble damages are in the amount of 1890.09 at this juncture. This initial small claims suit was initiated against the defendant in the amount of 630.03.
14. War Crimes Act of 1996
15. Genocide
The United States has signed the fourth Protocol confirmed by the ICRC.
Geneva Conventions of 1949 Protocols under the 4th Treaty regarding criminal repression are as follows:
Principle I-Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.
Principle II-The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed an act from responsibility under international law.
Principle III-The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government Official does not relieve him or her from responsibility under International Law.
Principle IV-The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his/her government or of a superior does not relieve him/her from responsibility under international law, provided that a moral choice was in fact possible to him/her.
I am seeking a restitution amount of 630.03 for failure to render a judgment with relevant facts and evidence presented in this small claims civil suit. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
This information is true, accurate, and to the best of my knowledge with no intent to deceive the public at large. This information is protected under U. C. C. 1-207 and 1-308. These documents are not to be sold, distributed, or transferred to a third party without my expressed written consent. This information is protected under Title 108 and 107 of the copyright and publishing laws. Freedom of speech is secured under the Declaration of Human Rights under International Law. All rights are reserved worldwide.