Out with The Old and In With The New "Created in the likeness of God" Ephesians 4:17-24 "...and put on the new self, which in the likeness of God has been created in righteousness and holiness of the truth." ? "The American Anti-Corruption Act makes it illegal to purchase political influence and puts power back in the hands of the people”. We the People.
Honorable Judge Gene E.K. Pratter of James A. Byrne U.S. Courthouse 601 Market Street Philadelphia PA 19106 Now should have case law that`s not in question, Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 95 F.3d 1066, 1072 (11th Cir. 1996). Cobb County v. McColister, 261 Ga. 876, 413 S.E.2d 441 (1992Fe). Bickerstaff Clay Products Co., Inc. v. Harris County, Ga., 89 F.3d 1481, 1491 (11th Cir. 1996) MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County, 477 U.S. 340, 106 S. Ct. 2561, 91 L.Ed.2d 285 (1986); Reahard v. Lee County, 30 F.2d 1412, 1215 (11th Cir. 1994). Cross v. Hall County, HAINES v. KERNER ET AL., 352 U.S. 112 (1956) WALKER v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON ET AL. No. 13. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 15-16, 1956. Decided December 10, 1956. DiSarrio v. Mills, 711 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) so on throughout this action and / or forthcoming.
A taxpayer-funded traffic study determined that such a zoning change was undesirable and dangerous as far back as 2008, long before a fatal accident in August 2016 with illegal actions. Taxpayer funded Investigations revealed: Francis X. Dillon Begley Carlin & Mandio, LLP ...Mr. Dillon serves as the Services Commission. Solicitor for Lower Southampton Township stated: "Although a taxpayer-funded investigation was completed and available, the municipal planning code was not followed.” Mr. Dillon said the MPC sets procedures regarding what municipalities are supposed to do regarding the "land development fee schedule,” which was not updated to reflect the change in the state law, so state law was also disregarded in my opinion.
Other taxpayer-funded Investigations are said to be ongoing at this time. Defendants were working with the political establishment and are/were the ones in control. Defendants possessed full knowledge of all existing rules and regulations yet acted invincible from the beginning, above the law. There are applicable city, state and federal regulations that prevent money from corrupting American government.
The regulation requires that companies report payments made to governments. I asked Stephen B. Harris Esq. of HARRIS AND HARRIS for copies of documents to help with a response now representing, Oak Property Management Lp., Ashley Management Co, County Builders County. Mike Meister, Kevin Reilly Defendants CIVIL ACTION 19 1429. Also working with or for Defendants or each other were Michael E. Peters, Esq., Michael T. Pidgeon, Esq., Michael J. Savona, Esq., John A. Vanluvanee Esq. aka Van. Eastburn & Gray, Doylestown, PA, Mr. Robert Hoopes, Esq. John Waltman, Carol Drioil of zoning, the Zoning Hearing Board, the Board of Supervisors, Mr. John McMenamin, Township Manager and I believe there are others, some uninformed and without knowledge of the facts.
The Equal Protection Clause is a clause within the text of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." A primary motivation for this clause was to validate the equality provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed that all citizens would have the guaranteed right to equal protection by law. If you’re reading this, know that our rights to municipal planning code and state laws were negated by the Defendants because of non-compliance with the ordinances of the Municipality and inappropriate use of its provisions.
My rights as a Plaintiff were violated, and if HARRIS AND HARRIS are thinking otherwise, they must produce the needed documentation as requested. I have made several requests for documentation from others than from HARRIS AND HARRIS, without receiving a response. Taxpayer-funded Investigations, Municipal planning code, State laws, non-compliance shows what? Political corruption now in are Courts System. Non-compliance as a taxpayer, relief is to share in our Codes, Laws, with the ordinances of the Municipality and use of its provisions equally.
The Equal Protection Clause, the clause on this matter has internal problems of issues withstanding, Mr. Stephen B. Harris? My Response is still forthcoming. Verification PLAINTIFF PETER SAUERS ADA Pro-se verifies that he is one for himself in this action and that the statements made in the foregoing are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. He understands that false statements made herein are subject to the penalties of law "18 pa. C.S. Section 4904’, relating to unsworn, falsification to authorities. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy and copies of the foregoing was served upon Stephen B. Harris Esq. of HARRIS AND HARRIS 1760 Bristol Rd, Warrington, PA 18976 US mail.
Harris & Harris Reviews
Out with The Old and In With The New "Created in the likeness of God" Ephesians 4:17-24 "...and put on the new self, which in the likeness of God has been created in righteousness and holiness of the truth." ? "The American Anti-Corruption Act makes it illegal to purchase political influence and puts power back in the hands of the people”. We the People.
Honorable Judge Gene E.K. Pratter of James A. Byrne U.S. Courthouse 601 Market Street Philadelphia PA 19106 Now should have case law that`s not in question, Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 95 F.3d 1066, 1072 (11th Cir. 1996). Cobb County v. McColister, 261 Ga. 876, 413 S.E.2d 441 (1992Fe). Bickerstaff Clay Products Co., Inc. v. Harris County, Ga., 89 F.3d 1481, 1491 (11th Cir. 1996) MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County, 477 U.S. 340, 106 S. Ct. 2561, 91 L.Ed.2d 285 (1986); Reahard v. Lee County, 30 F.2d 1412, 1215 (11th Cir. 1994). Cross v. Hall County, HAINES v. KERNER ET AL., 352 U.S. 112 (1956) WALKER v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON ET AL. No. 13. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 15-16, 1956. Decided December 10, 1956. DiSarrio v. Mills, 711 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) so on throughout this action and / or forthcoming.
A taxpayer-funded traffic study determined that such a zoning change was undesirable and dangerous as far back as 2008, long before a fatal accident in August 2016 with illegal actions. Taxpayer funded Investigations revealed: Francis X. Dillon Begley Carlin & Mandio, LLP ...Mr. Dillon serves as the Services Commission. Solicitor for Lower Southampton Township stated: "Although a taxpayer-funded investigation was completed and available, the municipal planning code was not followed.” Mr. Dillon said the MPC sets procedures regarding what municipalities are supposed to do regarding the "land development fee schedule,” which was not updated to reflect the change in the state law, so state law was also disregarded in my opinion.
Other taxpayer-funded Investigations are said to be ongoing at this time. Defendants were working with the political establishment and are/were the ones in control. Defendants possessed full knowledge of all existing rules and regulations yet acted invincible from the beginning, above the law. There are applicable city, state and federal regulations that prevent money from corrupting American government.
The regulation requires that companies report payments made to governments. I asked Stephen B. Harris Esq. of HARRIS AND HARRIS for copies of documents to help with a response now representing, Oak Property Management Lp., Ashley Management Co, County Builders County. Mike Meister, Kevin Reilly Defendants CIVIL ACTION 19 1429. Also working with or for Defendants or each other were Michael E. Peters, Esq., Michael T. Pidgeon, Esq., Michael J. Savona, Esq., John A. Vanluvanee Esq. aka Van. Eastburn & Gray, Doylestown, PA, Mr. Robert Hoopes, Esq. John Waltman, Carol Drioil of zoning, the Zoning Hearing Board, the Board of Supervisors, Mr. John McMenamin, Township Manager and I believe there are others, some uninformed and without knowledge of the facts.
The Equal Protection Clause is a clause within the text of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." A primary motivation for this clause was to validate the equality provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed that all citizens would have the guaranteed right to equal protection by law. If you’re reading this, know that our rights to municipal planning code and state laws were negated by the Defendants because of non-compliance with the ordinances of the Municipality and inappropriate use of its provisions.
My rights as a Plaintiff were violated, and if HARRIS AND HARRIS are thinking otherwise, they must produce the needed documentation as requested. I have made several requests for documentation from others than from HARRIS AND HARRIS, without receiving a response. Taxpayer-funded Investigations, Municipal planning code, State laws, non-compliance shows what? Political corruption now in are Courts System. Non-compliance as a taxpayer, relief is to share in our Codes, Laws, with the ordinances of the Municipality and use of its provisions equally.
The Equal Protection Clause, the clause on this matter has internal problems of issues withstanding, Mr. Stephen B. Harris? My Response is still forthcoming. Verification PLAINTIFF PETER SAUERS ADA Pro-se verifies that he is one for himself in this action and that the statements made in the foregoing are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. He understands that false statements made herein are subject to the penalties of law "18 pa. C.S. Section 4904’, relating to unsworn, falsification to authorities. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy and copies of the foregoing was served upon Stephen B. Harris Esq. of HARRIS AND HARRIS 1760 Bristol Rd, Warrington, PA 18976 US mail.