Harcus Sinclair - Failings in Truth and Integrity, Dishonesty, Misrepresentation, improper Service, Abuse of Self-represented Litigants, Violations of SRA Rules, Causing Financial Loss to a Spiritual Master
HARCUS SINCLAIR SOLICITORS / LONDON
Failings in Truth and Integrity, Dishonesty, Misrepresentation, improper Service, Abuse of Self-represented Litigants, Violations of SRA Rules, Causing Financial Loss to a Spiritual Master and Interference in Freedom of Expression
Spiritual Master Free Spirit requires this firm: To pay compensation of one million pounds sterling to settle claims for damages to his work.
Penalty: £1,000,000
Date: 01/08/2016
I have an ethical and moral duty to exercise the rights of Qualified Privilege with regard to this law firm in order to tell the truth, in self-defence and to warn others about harm or danger.
The truth is that Harcus Sinclair do not play by the ethical rules that govern their profession and use unfair means against litigants including threats of jail or loss, failing to honour proper pre-action protocol procedures, telliing lies of omissions in Court, general abuse, undermining peoples rights to a fair trail, signing off statements as true knowing they are false and supporting potential miscarriages of justice - not to mention threatening people with jail at Christmas.
Harcus Sinclair - Dishonesty to Court. Lying to High Court Masters and Judges
Dishonesty to Court. Lying to High Court Masters and Judges.
Lending a helping hand to those involved in cheating, dishonesty, ripping people off, causing them losses, SLAPP suits, etc..
In the case of Power Places Tours v Free Spirit, with Free Spirit being the self represented defendant - the counsel for the claimant Power Places Tours thought they could get away with threatening a Spiritual Master with loss and detriment if he did not tell black lies to help their client get away with blatent dishonest acts including defrauding customers and SLAPP suits.
-These black lies required him to lie to Pissed Consumer, so he refused.
-Free Spirit fought back in a justified manner and decided to teach dishonest lawyers a lesson. In this particular matter, the moral justifications that Free Spirit has give him the supreme privilege to tell the truth and to disclose bad behaviour in the legal profession.
His justifications and the nature of the case also give a strong justification for telling the truth on these sites.
Harcus Sinclair (and Edward Parkes) represent Power Places Tours and lied frequently to the High Court to deceive its Masters and Judges and encouraged their Client to tell lies in the witness statements.
Free Spirit was threatened with jail at Christmas if he did not retract his truthful disclosures on Pissed Consumer.
They now have the problem that they cannot shut Free Spirit up and thus a major scandal in the UK legal profession is immiment once word gets out what is being suppressed here.
The moral justifications at hand (just Google Emissary of Source Mission Statement) coupled with his words "with Gods Love and Wisdom" - enabled Free Spirit to turn the tables on dishonest and corrupt lawyers who cheat and lie (in Court) to help clients get away with immoral behaviour.
He decided to make a stand and instead continued tellling the truth to the point where Harcus Sinclair cannot make him be quiet because he has deadman switches.
Free Spirit is actually immune from suit, for reasons explained on his website and he claims to be here from 'another reality' warning of imminent disaster for humanity.
He states that those that try and harm him experience their own destruction because of a Higher Power that deals with all that is not pure. This is their karma.
Free Spirit sent many friendly reminders to Harcus Sinclair about karma and decided not to sort out their differences and instead continue to try and harm him.
Free Spirit is claiming 1million pounds in damages for damage done to his work.
The record also shows that Harcus Sinclair violated several rules of ethical conduct and have invoked karma:-
-Free Spirit was threatened with having websites made about him citing him of bad integrity (this was put in writing by David Hirst of 5RB)
-He was threatened with a criminal suit if he did not withdraw his complaints - an unlawful act when trying to settle a civil dispute.
-He was served defectively, late, and at times when it would be impossible to respond properly. Examples include waiting until Christmas Eve or a holiday.
-Edward Parkes lied in Court and omitted the fact that Free Spirit had a very big moral justification for his actions and instead claimed he had none.
-His other lies and service failings were so blatent that the judge was misled into impinging upon Free Spirits freedom of expression rights.
-They routinely threatened him with further loss if he did not take down postings he did not make.
-Harcus Sinclair instructed 5RB (David Hirst) to lie to the Court as well.
-In addition, their Client has a documented history of association with fraudsters, stalkers (one of which stalked Free Spirit for 2 years and labelled his partner sick and twisted in public) and with the Claimants blessing.
-Their Client also is at risk of insolvency for cheating customers out of huge sums of money over many years and has now been billed GBP 1 Million in damages to Free Spirit's work (just Google Power Places Tours Million) and Free Spirit explains himself in detail.
The moral of the story is that if you are in truth, stand up for yourself.
Solicitors can and do lie, and with impunity and the way to stop it is to expose it.
I do not advocate lying or defaming lawyers, but if they have done wrong, it is morally right to expose it, regardless of the threats made by them - as long as the truth is the truth.
Truth defeats falsehood, and those who thought they could gain by threatening Free Spirit to conceal evidence of wrongdoing and harm, have found their plans have backfired badly as Free Spirit stands to become famous in this matter.
Harcus Sinclair stand to have 'egg on their face' as a result of this matter and are named and shamed for dishonesty, deception and conspiring to damage the work of a Spiritual Master grounded in higher ethics, truth and morality.
Harcus sinclair is a corrupt, dishonest and fraudulent lawfirm that erroneously believed they could try making a spiritual master grounded in truth and integrity be quiet about serious ethical violations at harcus sinclair. Some of those violations 'look very similar' to obtaining money by deception, misrepresentation, criminal fraud, assisting clients in unethical and criminal activities - and subornation.
I have seen much documentary evidence that shows me that harcus sinclair are lacking in integrity, represent cheats and fraudsters, and attempt the same Cheating and fraud) in order to advance their position in the world of london law.
Harcus sinclair have already been told that karma does not make exceptions, and a firm who believe they can lend a helping hand to conspiring to cause the death of a spiritual master - or to obtain money from one by way of fraud or deception - and somehow get away with it, are mistaken.
The karmic consequence of such an act is loss, detriment and the intervention of the solicitors regulation authority, who may penalize some of harcus sinclairs associates.
Were i to be harmed in any way, then significant numbers of deadman switches will simply push this firm into scandal.
I have many legal priviliges, as well as the love and wisdom of the higher source that allow me to make statements to prevent harm or danger, or to prevent crime, or in self defence, or in the public interest as well as fair and honest criticism of public officials Including solicitors). This falls under qualified privilege.
Absolute privilege is also something i have, by way of a higher power. This is because i am aware of a threat to humanity that will result in significant losses of human life on a continental scale (40-60% of humanity lost). I was sent to earth to assist in that matter and when the wellbeing of so many humans is on the line - there is a higher power that gives me special protection and causes catastrophic damage to dishonest parties intent on interfering with my work, usually because all that is of impure ethics Including hurting people, abusing litigants in person, cheating, lying and threatening spiritual masters) rises to the fore for healing and because of the damage done to the wellbeing of the human race as a whole.
Law firms are not exempt from the forces of karma and moral purification and it is reasonable to assume they are in dispute with me as they have some moral and ethical issues that need straightening out in the presence of a spiritual master, and they have by way of their conduct asked to be transformed by source Aka ethically purified/learning the importance of telling the truth and not being dishonest).
As the conduct of law firms is a public interest matter - it will be done in public for all to see the shortcomings and abuses within the legal profession, even within high profile boutique law firms.
Those who interfere with the work of a spiritual master also incur detriment and loss as they are called to look at their deficient morality, their predisposition to lie or cheat as well as the reality of heavy damages bills.
For those reasons, harcus sinclair have been billed for gbp 1 million in damages for intentional interference in my work
I can also make a prophecy Hs are already aware of my ability to foresee the future accurately). I foresee harcus sinclair experiencing a significant downsizing, some of its partners disciplined for breaking the rules, a loss of reputation and clientele, heavy embarassment, heavy losses - in money and in clientele, media coverage, fines and penalties from the regulatory bodies, the resignation of those responsible - followed by a long overdue apology to myself - and of course, the payment of my settlement that the higher power of source has decreed i will receive.
I have an ethical and moral duty to exercise the rights of Qualified Privilege with regard to this law firm in order to tell the truth, in self-defence and to warn others about harm or danger. The truth is that Harcus Sinclair do not play by the ethical rules that govern their profession and use unfair means against litigants including threats of jail or loss, failing to honour proper pre-action protocol procedures, telliing lies of omissions in Court, general abuse, undermining peoples rights to a fair trail, signing off statements as true knowing they are false and supporting potential miscarriages of justice - not to mention threatening people with jail at Christmas. Harcus Sinclair also specialize in dishonesty and deception.
Some of their associates tell lies to the High Court, its Judges and its Masters. So the aforementioned is the 'harm or danger' - namely that one may be jailed or suffer severe loss - or even be imprisoned wrongly if they do not yield to the demands made by certain associates of Harcus Sinclair. They also have friends in 'Chambers' who lie, fabricate cases based on intimidation and fear, violate their own ethical codes of practice - or tell blatent lies to mislead judges and the legal system as a whole.
There is a difference between zealous advocacy and plain abusive immoral and unethical behaviour. The latter is of impure intent, and any lawfirm threatening a Spiritual Master to admit to things he did not do under threat of jail or loss - or being labelled in public as a man of bad integrity - or to try and force them into telling black lies to support immoral and even criminal behaviour - is certainly asking to be ethically purified and investigated by the regulatory bodies that oversee their work. Those investigations will begin shortly and any findings made public in the interests of the moral evolution of the legal justice system and those who serve it. As I have the right to defend myself, to warn others about a harm or danger and to tell the truth - I am in essence immune from suit as long as I am ethically responsible in what I disclose and in that instance, Harcus Sinclair would thus be fully responsible for any losses.
Caution is advised with this lawfirm as they appear to be dishonest and ethically impure. They also use barristers implicated in debasement, dishonesty and other scandals who make threats to try and force defendants into making perjerous statements in order to advance the agendas of dishonesty and moral turpitude. They take on cases from clients who are involved in shady, unethical, cheaty and dishonest behaviour - and thus cause their own problems by taking on 'dirty work' so to speak. Their client has been defeated and billed GBP 1million in damages to the work of a Spiritual Master.
Harcus Sinclair have also been billed GBP 50,000 for lessons in truth and integrity in business and legal dealings and have defaulted on the payment - and thus it can be said that Harcus Sinclair do not pay their bills on time. If you look to Harcus Sinclair to resolve a legal matter, you may end up paying them lots of money and end up with a worse situation, for their 'incisive style' approach may backfire. There are more honest legal firms in London with better ethical standards.. I confirm the above is the truth and made under the privileges of Absolute/Qualified Privileges that make me immune to suit in this matter.
Edward parkes is a lawyer who works for harcus sinclair in the uk
Edward parkes has chosen to ignore his duty to ethics, truth and common values in favour of acting as a slapp lawyer in order to stifle honest and fair reporting by whistleblowers
For those who do not know what a slapp lawsuit is:-
Strategic lawsuit against public participation
From wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A strategic lawsuit against public participation Slapp) is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition.
The typical slapp plaintiff does not normally expect to win the lawsuit. The plaintiff's goals are accomplished if the defendant succumbs to fear, intimidation, mounting legal costs or simple exhaustion and abandons the criticism.
The case against edward parkes is indisuptable for his activites clearly fall under behaviour that looks very slapp like including.
Edward Parkes is a lawyer who works for Harcus Sinclair in the UK
Edward Parkes has taken on a 'SLAPP-like' case for Power Places Tours Inc, a company with an extensive track record of unethical behaviour. As they already have a Rip Off Report, there is no need to repeat the details here, but for reference, here is the Rip Off Report for Power Places Tours which also contains all the evidence to back up my statements here.
Harcus Sinclair Reviews
Harcus Sinclair - Failings in Truth and Integrity, Dishonesty, Misrepresentation, improper Service, Abuse of Self-represented Litigants, Violations of SRA Rules, Causing Financial Loss to a Spiritual Master
HARCUS SINCLAIR SOLICITORS / LONDON
Failings in Truth and Integrity, Dishonesty, Misrepresentation, improper Service, Abuse of Self-represented Litigants, Violations of SRA Rules, Causing Financial Loss to a Spiritual Master and Interference in Freedom of Expression
Spiritual Master Free Spirit requires this firm: To pay compensation of one million pounds sterling to settle claims for damages to his work.
Penalty: £1,000,000
Date: 01/08/2016
I have an ethical and moral duty to exercise the rights of Qualified Privilege with regard to this law firm in order to tell the truth, in self-defence and to warn others about harm or danger.
The truth is that Harcus Sinclair do not play by the ethical rules that govern their profession and use unfair means against litigants including threats of jail or loss, failing to honour proper pre-action protocol procedures, telliing lies of omissions in Court, general abuse, undermining peoples rights to a fair trail, signing off statements as true knowing they are false and supporting potential miscarriages of justice - not to mention threatening people with jail at Christmas.
Harcus Sinclair - Dishonesty to Court. Lying to High Court Masters and Judges
Dishonesty to Court. Lying to High Court Masters and Judges.
Lending a helping hand to those involved in cheating, dishonesty, ripping people off, causing them losses, SLAPP suits, etc..
In the case of Power Places Tours v Free Spirit, with Free Spirit being the self represented defendant - the counsel for the claimant Power Places Tours thought they could get away with threatening a Spiritual Master with loss and detriment if he did not tell black lies to help their client get away with blatent dishonest acts including defrauding customers and SLAPP suits.
-These black lies required him to lie to Pissed Consumer, so he refused.
-Free Spirit fought back in a justified manner and decided to teach dishonest lawyers a lesson. In this particular matter, the moral justifications that Free Spirit has give him the supreme privilege to tell the truth and to disclose bad behaviour in the legal profession.
His justifications and the nature of the case also give a strong justification for telling the truth on these sites.
Harcus Sinclair (and Edward Parkes) represent Power Places Tours and lied frequently to the High Court to deceive its Masters and Judges and encouraged their Client to tell lies in the witness statements.
Free Spirit was threatened with jail at Christmas if he did not retract his truthful disclosures on Pissed Consumer.
They now have the problem that they cannot shut Free Spirit up and thus a major scandal in the UK legal profession is immiment once word gets out what is being suppressed here.
The moral justifications at hand (just Google Emissary of Source Mission Statement) coupled with his words "with Gods Love and Wisdom" - enabled Free Spirit to turn the tables on dishonest and corrupt lawyers who cheat and lie (in Court) to help clients get away with immoral behaviour.
He decided to make a stand and instead continued tellling the truth to the point where Harcus Sinclair cannot make him be quiet because he has deadman switches.
Free Spirit is actually immune from suit, for reasons explained on his website and he claims to be here from 'another reality' warning of imminent disaster for humanity.
He states that those that try and harm him experience their own destruction because of a Higher Power that deals with all that is not pure. This is their karma.
Free Spirit sent many friendly reminders to Harcus Sinclair about karma and decided not to sort out their differences and instead continue to try and harm him.
Free Spirit is claiming 1million pounds in damages for damage done to his work.
The record also shows that Harcus Sinclair violated several rules of ethical conduct and have invoked karma:-
-Free Spirit was threatened with having websites made about him citing him of bad integrity (this was put in writing by David Hirst of 5RB)
-He was threatened with a criminal suit if he did not withdraw his complaints - an unlawful act when trying to settle a civil dispute.
-He was served defectively, late, and at times when it would be impossible to respond properly. Examples include waiting until Christmas Eve or a holiday.
-Edward Parkes lied in Court and omitted the fact that Free Spirit had a very big moral justification for his actions and instead claimed he had none.
-His other lies and service failings were so blatent that the judge was misled into impinging upon Free Spirits freedom of expression rights.
-They routinely threatened him with further loss if he did not take down postings he did not make.
-Harcus Sinclair instructed 5RB (David Hirst) to lie to the Court as well.
-In addition, their Client has a documented history of association with fraudsters, stalkers (one of which stalked Free Spirit for 2 years and labelled his partner sick and twisted in public) and with the Claimants blessing.
-Their Client also is at risk of insolvency for cheating customers out of huge sums of money over many years and has now been billed GBP 1 Million in damages to Free Spirit's work (just Google Power Places Tours Million) and Free Spirit explains himself in detail.
The moral of the story is that if you are in truth, stand up for yourself.
Solicitors can and do lie, and with impunity and the way to stop it is to expose it.
I do not advocate lying or defaming lawyers, but if they have done wrong, it is morally right to expose it, regardless of the threats made by them - as long as the truth is the truth.
Truth defeats falsehood, and those who thought they could gain by threatening Free Spirit to conceal evidence of wrongdoing and harm, have found their plans have backfired badly as Free Spirit stands to become famous in this matter.
Harcus Sinclair stand to have 'egg on their face' as a result of this matter and are named and shamed for dishonesty, deception and conspiring to damage the work of a Spiritual Master grounded in higher ethics, truth and morality.
Harcus sinclair is a corrupt, dishonest and fraudulent lawfirm that erroneously believed they could try making a spiritual master grounded in truth and integrity be quiet about serious ethical violations at harcus sinclair. Some of those violations 'look very similar' to obtaining money by deception, misrepresentation, criminal fraud, assisting clients in unethical and criminal activities - and subornation.
I have seen much documentary evidence that shows me that harcus sinclair are lacking in integrity, represent cheats and fraudsters, and attempt the same Cheating and fraud) in order to advance their position in the world of london law.
Harcus sinclair have already been told that karma does not make exceptions, and a firm who believe they can lend a helping hand to conspiring to cause the death of a spiritual master - or to obtain money from one by way of fraud or deception - and somehow get away with it, are mistaken.
The karmic consequence of such an act is loss, detriment and the intervention of the solicitors regulation authority, who may penalize some of harcus sinclairs associates.
Were i to be harmed in any way, then significant numbers of deadman switches will simply push this firm into scandal.
I have many legal priviliges, as well as the love and wisdom of the higher source that allow me to make statements to prevent harm or danger, or to prevent crime, or in self defence, or in the public interest as well as fair and honest criticism of public officials Including solicitors). This falls under qualified privilege.
Absolute privilege is also something i have, by way of a higher power. This is because i am aware of a threat to humanity that will result in significant losses of human life on a continental scale (40-60% of humanity lost). I was sent to earth to assist in that matter and when the wellbeing of so many humans is on the line - there is a higher power that gives me special protection and causes catastrophic damage to dishonest parties intent on interfering with my work, usually because all that is of impure ethics Including hurting people, abusing litigants in person, cheating, lying and threatening spiritual masters) rises to the fore for healing and because of the damage done to the wellbeing of the human race as a whole.
Law firms are not exempt from the forces of karma and moral purification and it is reasonable to assume they are in dispute with me as they have some moral and ethical issues that need straightening out in the presence of a spiritual master, and they have by way of their conduct asked to be transformed by source Aka ethically purified/learning the importance of telling the truth and not being dishonest).
As the conduct of law firms is a public interest matter - it will be done in public for all to see the shortcomings and abuses within the legal profession, even within high profile boutique law firms.
Those who interfere with the work of a spiritual master also incur detriment and loss as they are called to look at their deficient morality, their predisposition to lie or cheat as well as the reality of heavy damages bills.
For those reasons, harcus sinclair have been billed for gbp 1 million in damages for intentional interference in my work
I can also make a prophecy Hs are already aware of my ability to foresee the future accurately). I foresee harcus sinclair experiencing a significant downsizing, some of its partners disciplined for breaking the rules, a loss of reputation and clientele, heavy embarassment, heavy losses - in money and in clientele, media coverage, fines and penalties from the regulatory bodies, the resignation of those responsible - followed by a long overdue apology to myself - and of course, the payment of my settlement that the higher power of source has decreed i will receive.
Specializing in dishonesty and deception
I have an ethical and moral duty to exercise the rights of Qualified Privilege with regard to this law firm in order to tell the truth, in self-defence and to warn others about harm or danger. The truth is that Harcus Sinclair do not play by the ethical rules that govern their profession and use unfair means against litigants including threats of jail or loss, failing to honour proper pre-action protocol procedures, telliing lies of omissions in Court, general abuse, undermining peoples rights to a fair trail, signing off statements as true knowing they are false and supporting potential miscarriages of justice - not to mention threatening people with jail at Christmas. Harcus Sinclair also specialize in dishonesty and deception.
Some of their associates tell lies to the High Court, its Judges and its Masters. So the aforementioned is the 'harm or danger' - namely that one may be jailed or suffer severe loss - or even be imprisoned wrongly if they do not yield to the demands made by certain associates of Harcus Sinclair. They also have friends in 'Chambers' who lie, fabricate cases based on intimidation and fear, violate their own ethical codes of practice - or tell blatent lies to mislead judges and the legal system as a whole.
There is a difference between zealous advocacy and plain abusive immoral and unethical behaviour. The latter is of impure intent, and any lawfirm threatening a Spiritual Master to admit to things he did not do under threat of jail or loss - or being labelled in public as a man of bad integrity - or to try and force them into telling black lies to support immoral and even criminal behaviour - is certainly asking to be ethically purified and investigated by the regulatory bodies that oversee their work. Those investigations will begin shortly and any findings made public in the interests of the moral evolution of the legal justice system and those who serve it. As I have the right to defend myself, to warn others about a harm or danger and to tell the truth - I am in essence immune from suit as long as I am ethically responsible in what I disclose and in that instance, Harcus Sinclair would thus be fully responsible for any losses.
Caution is advised with this lawfirm as they appear to be dishonest and ethically impure. They also use barristers implicated in debasement, dishonesty and other scandals who make threats to try and force defendants into making perjerous statements in order to advance the agendas of dishonesty and moral turpitude. They take on cases from clients who are involved in shady, unethical, cheaty and dishonest behaviour - and thus cause their own problems by taking on 'dirty work' so to speak. Their client has been defeated and billed GBP 1million in damages to the work of a Spiritual Master.
Harcus Sinclair have also been billed GBP 50,000 for lessons in truth and integrity in business and legal dealings and have defaulted on the payment - and thus it can be said that Harcus Sinclair do not pay their bills on time. If you look to Harcus Sinclair to resolve a legal matter, you may end up paying them lots of money and end up with a worse situation, for their 'incisive style' approach may backfire. There are more honest legal firms in London with better ethical standards.. I confirm the above is the truth and made under the privileges of Absolute/Qualified Privileges that make me immune to suit in this matter.
Edward parkes is a lawyer who works for harcus sinclair in the uk
Edward parkes has chosen to ignore his duty to ethics, truth and common values in favour of acting as a slapp lawyer in order to stifle honest and fair reporting by whistleblowers
For those who do not know what a slapp lawsuit is:-
Strategic lawsuit against public participation
From wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A strategic lawsuit against public participation Slapp) is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition.
The typical slapp plaintiff does not normally expect to win the lawsuit. The plaintiff's goals are accomplished if the defendant succumbs to fear, intimidation, mounting legal costs or simple exhaustion and abandons the criticism.
The case against edward parkes is indisuptable for his activites clearly fall under behaviour that looks very slapp like including.
Edward Parkes is a lawyer who works for Harcus Sinclair in the UK
Edward Parkes has taken on a 'SLAPP-like' case for Power Places Tours Inc, a company with an extensive track record of unethical behaviour. As they already have a Rip Off Report, there is no need to repeat the details here, but for reference, here is the Rip Off Report for Power Places Tours which also contains all the evidence to back up my statements here.