We are asking for a truthful investigation into the illegal adoption of our son, Maryland case # 02-a-11-001354ad / scotus # 13-251). We believe there was or may have been coercion, fraud on the court, conspiracy to deny civil rights, and the denial of civil rights committed by the following:
Adoptions from the heart Afth) - social workers danielle goodman, kim whitemore and michaelina bendig
Jennifer fairfax, llc – a lawyer and associate of mark mcdermott, paid for with “donations” by afth to complete the adoption on our behalf, but clearly acted in the best interest of the adopting family and afth, a professional member of families for private adoptions Fpa) through 2012-1013.
Mark t. Mcdermott, esq. – a lawyer hired by the adopting family, who we have been informed has been found guilty of adoption fraud in the state of virginia for such actions as falsification of paperwork, conspiracy to keep parents in the dark, retaliatory lawsuits and fraud on the court Please see enclosed email and statement to judge s.
Michael pincus), former president of the fpa and on the board of directors through 2012-2013. Admitted to the maryland lawboard that virginia had found him guilty in the baby emma case and that they "privately admonished" him, but he has decided that it is a crime for anyone to talk about what he did to force an adoption in a case where virginia state decided emma should be returned to her family and that the case fell under the parental kidnapping act.
Lee s. Ashmore, esq. – a lawyer we hired to assist us with the revocation, who missed hearings, did not open our file, and blames the court for missing hearings.
Judge pamela l. North – judge who presided over the december 29th, 2011 hearing that finalized the adoption without acknowledging our request for revocation.
Judge nancy l. Davis-loomis - judge who initially overturned the adoption, the falsified court records to claim she held a hearing despite being on the record many times that the hearing in question was never to examine the existence of fraud in this matter.
Hunt reporting company – court reporting and litigation support
Matthew j. Genesio - fraudulent adopter
Gina marie gensio, crnp - fraudulent adopter, granddaugher of judge armand pomente Deceased)
Please note our affidavit and that we have signed it acknowledging that if we had lied it would be perjury:
Please also see our request an investigation into mark t. Mcdermott's 20 year history of kidnapping children through fraudulent adoption as observed by judges, lawyers, parents and lawboards:
We are also asking for an investigation of the parties below and into the restraining order filed against us in retaliation for exercising our freedom of speech, and our rights to ask for assitance in the fraudulent adoption of our son:
Gina marie genesio- alleged victim who we can show has repeatedly lied to us, including making statements that no stalking victim would ever make to her stalker, including that she could not wait for us to have a relationship if only we would stop asking for the return of our son.
Matthew j. Genesio
Detective robert bostick, detective todd bereda: detectives who rushed to judgement, held a fake 2 week investigation, hid the ro hearings from us, then lied to press about being in contact with our lawyers
Megan stumpf - former county prosecutor who served as their lawyer, has a history of imprisoning innocent people if they refuse to testify against their spouses in domestic violence cases, had access to our affadavit but decided that without investigating the adoption that she herself could decide it was legal. She made fun of our affidavit and the lawful investigation into parties mentioned in the affidavit and in doing so proved that she and her clients were willing to perjur themselves and hold themselves above the law as they had no right to interfere with or deny a lawful investigation. She also told our lawyer that what her clients mostly wanted was for us to be denied access to the internet, and at that points he proved that she herself knew that we posed no bodily harm to her clients and that she herself was enabling to apply for a ro in bad faith. She and her clients described us to the press as being close to homicidal maniacs who would abduct a child at gun point, and yet their biggest fear was our access to the internet? She knew her clients were malingering and she was being paid to gain the ro, not tell the truth. Her clients have repeatedly attacked our freedom of speech, and our attempts to have the fraud investigated, and our appeal which they called a crime and a mental illness In writing). This ro is nothing more than their attempts to slander us, and to obstruct justice, and megan's comment to our lawyer shows she was cognizant that we were asking for a legal remedy. Had we even threatened actual violence, and we never had, then she and her clients and the detectives would not have needed to lie to the judge or hidden the hearings and transcripts from us.
Cara fitzpatrick - the court clerk who has made repeated excuses for not sending us our paid for court transcripts.
The restraining order was granted after 2 days of hearings for which we were never served properly, and despite the fact that the hearing was not held in the arbitrary time limit allotted by pennsylvania law. It should be noted that this contradicts the fraudulent adopters primary reason for keeping jonathan, in that they said arbitrary court dates should be obeyed no matter what, and they did not care if we were under durress, if our lawyers had been guilty of misconduct and they didn't feel we should be allowed a hearing to prevent evidence or to have an investigation--not even if a child had been kidnapped.
Gina marie genesio falsely reported A crime in of itself) that she had seen us outside her home. The police detectives involved immediately helped her gain a temporary restraining order from the court. Although they had been in contact with us, the detectives lied to the press, public and judge complaining that we had not cooperated with their fake investigation and saying that they did not know if we even had a lawyer. We have emails from and to our lawyer where the detectives spoke of an alleged 2 week investigation, but never asked for our alibi, or for any thing else from us or our lawyer, prefering instead to threaten us with punishment for crimes that allegedly had not even been investigated yet---showing a clear rush to judgement---and this was dispite the fact that they told the press we had broken no laws.
Had we been asked, we would have told the police that gina marie genesio lied when she said we were in front of her house. We have witnesses, bank statements, and socail media posts proving that we were not even in her state when she claimed that we were in front of her house. She also claimed to have seen a brunette female in front of her house and had the police bothered to check with the dmv, they would have noticed that neither one of us match her description. She also described the drive from her state to ours as a 2 hour drive. The police should have also noticed this. It is only a 2 hour drive if the toll roads are taken from baltimore to pennsylvania. Since it was alleged that we have "access to weapons" Simply due to our military service) and attempting to abduct a child at gunpoint during an interstate crime, the police might have thought of issuing an amber alert, or at the very least checking the security cameras at the toll booths. They did not do this, or if they did they lied. Our car would not have been photographed at any toll booth, meaning that the trip could not have been any 2 hour drive, but 3 1/2 on the roads without the toll----this means that the impossible trip becomes even more impossible. We did not have time to make the trip, do all the crap we were accused of doing Despite the press being told we had not broken any laws) and then returned home in time to be where and with whom we actually spent the day.
Genesio Company Reviews
We are asking for a truthful investigation into the illegal adoption of our son, Maryland case # 02-a-11-001354ad / scotus # 13-251). We believe there was or may have been coercion, fraud on the court, conspiracy to deny civil rights, and the denial of civil rights committed by the following:
Adoptions from the heart Afth) - social workers danielle goodman, kim whitemore and michaelina bendig
Jennifer fairfax, llc – a lawyer and associate of mark mcdermott, paid for with “donations” by afth to complete the adoption on our behalf, but clearly acted in the best interest of the adopting family and afth, a professional member of families for private adoptions Fpa) through 2012-1013.
Mark t. Mcdermott, esq. – a lawyer hired by the adopting family, who we have been informed has been found guilty of adoption fraud in the state of virginia for such actions as falsification of paperwork, conspiracy to keep parents in the dark, retaliatory lawsuits and fraud on the court Please see enclosed email and statement to judge s.
Michael pincus), former president of the fpa and on the board of directors through 2012-2013. Admitted to the maryland lawboard that virginia had found him guilty in the baby emma case and that they "privately admonished" him, but he has decided that it is a crime for anyone to talk about what he did to force an adoption in a case where virginia state decided emma should be returned to her family and that the case fell under the parental kidnapping act.
Lee s. Ashmore, esq. – a lawyer we hired to assist us with the revocation, who missed hearings, did not open our file, and blames the court for missing hearings.
Judge pamela l. North – judge who presided over the december 29th, 2011 hearing that finalized the adoption without acknowledging our request for revocation.
Judge nancy l. Davis-loomis - judge who initially overturned the adoption, the falsified court records to claim she held a hearing despite being on the record many times that the hearing in question was never to examine the existence of fraud in this matter.
Hunt reporting company – court reporting and litigation support
Matthew j. Genesio - fraudulent adopter
Gina marie gensio, crnp - fraudulent adopter, granddaugher of judge armand pomente Deceased)
Please note our affidavit and that we have signed it acknowledging that if we had lied it would be perjury:
Https://drive.Google.com/file/d/0b2b4icnexfvgqwhvcnrlq2dzluk/edit?Usp=sharing
Please also see our request an investigation into mark t. Mcdermott's 20 year history of kidnapping children through fraudulent adoption as observed by judges, lawyers, parents and lawboards:
Https://drive.Google.com/file/d/0b2b4icnexfvgcueycgy4s1zvumm/edit?Usp=sharing
We are also asking for an investigation of the parties below and into the restraining order filed against us in retaliation for exercising our freedom of speech, and our rights to ask for assitance in the fraudulent adoption of our son:
Gina marie genesio- alleged victim who we can show has repeatedly lied to us, including making statements that no stalking victim would ever make to her stalker, including that she could not wait for us to have a relationship if only we would stop asking for the return of our son.
Matthew j. Genesio
Detective robert bostick, detective todd bereda: detectives who rushed to judgement, held a fake 2 week investigation, hid the ro hearings from us, then lied to press about being in contact with our lawyers
Megan stumpf - former county prosecutor who served as their lawyer, has a history of imprisoning innocent people if they refuse to testify against their spouses in domestic violence cases, had access to our affadavit but decided that without investigating the adoption that she herself could decide it was legal. She made fun of our affidavit and the lawful investigation into parties mentioned in the affidavit and in doing so proved that she and her clients were willing to perjur themselves and hold themselves above the law as they had no right to interfere with or deny a lawful investigation. She also told our lawyer that what her clients mostly wanted was for us to be denied access to the internet, and at that points he proved that she herself knew that we posed no bodily harm to her clients and that she herself was enabling to apply for a ro in bad faith. She and her clients described us to the press as being close to homicidal maniacs who would abduct a child at gun point, and yet their biggest fear was our access to the internet? She knew her clients were malingering and she was being paid to gain the ro, not tell the truth. Her clients have repeatedly attacked our freedom of speech, and our attempts to have the fraud investigated, and our appeal which they called a crime and a mental illness In writing). This ro is nothing more than their attempts to slander us, and to obstruct justice, and megan's comment to our lawyer shows she was cognizant that we were asking for a legal remedy. Had we even threatened actual violence, and we never had, then she and her clients and the detectives would not have needed to lie to the judge or hidden the hearings and transcripts from us.
Cara fitzpatrick - the court clerk who has made repeated excuses for not sending us our paid for court transcripts.
The restraining order was granted after 2 days of hearings for which we were never served properly, and despite the fact that the hearing was not held in the arbitrary time limit allotted by pennsylvania law. It should be noted that this contradicts the fraudulent adopters primary reason for keeping jonathan, in that they said arbitrary court dates should be obeyed no matter what, and they did not care if we were under durress, if our lawyers had been guilty of misconduct and they didn't feel we should be allowed a hearing to prevent evidence or to have an investigation--not even if a child had been kidnapped.
Gina marie genesio falsely reported A crime in of itself) that she had seen us outside her home. The police detectives involved immediately helped her gain a temporary restraining order from the court. Although they had been in contact with us, the detectives lied to the press, public and judge complaining that we had not cooperated with their fake investigation and saying that they did not know if we even had a lawyer. We have emails from and to our lawyer where the detectives spoke of an alleged 2 week investigation, but never asked for our alibi, or for any thing else from us or our lawyer, prefering instead to threaten us with punishment for crimes that allegedly had not even been investigated yet---showing a clear rush to judgement---and this was dispite the fact that they told the press we had broken no laws.
Had we been asked, we would have told the police that gina marie genesio lied when she said we were in front of her house. We have witnesses, bank statements, and socail media posts proving that we were not even in her state when she claimed that we were in front of her house. She also claimed to have seen a brunette female in front of her house and had the police bothered to check with the dmv, they would have noticed that neither one of us match her description. She also described the drive from her state to ours as a 2 hour drive. The police should have also noticed this. It is only a 2 hour drive if the toll roads are taken from baltimore to pennsylvania. Since it was alleged that we have "access to weapons" Simply due to our military service) and attempting to abduct a child at gunpoint during an interstate crime, the police might have thought of issuing an amber alert, or at the very least checking the security cameras at the toll booths. They did not do this, or if they did they lied. Our car would not have been photographed at any toll booth, meaning that the trip could not have been any 2 hour drive, but 3 1/2 on the roads without the toll----this means that the impossible trip becomes even more impossible. We did not have time to make the trip, do all the crap we were accused of doing Despite the press being told we had not broken any laws) and then returned home in time to be where and with whom we actually spent the day.