Count I: the first 91 words / numbers of MCL 750.145c2 - they deleted the last 61 words which demonstrate it was inapplicable for prosecution. NO VICTIM - NO CRIME.
Count II: Using a computer to violate the half statute MCL 750.145d2f How does half a statute provide jurisdiction to activate computer prohibition statute ?
Counts III & IV: Using a computer to violate a partial title ( title has no effect of law, is not part of the law ) of a permanently enjoined statute : 1999 PA 33 which required commercial gain for selling online products . No victim , no commercial gain , no sales or attempted sales - it was inapplicable for prosecution against ANYONE ON tHE PLANET
How does a partial title validly activate computer prohibition statutes?
Does that qualify for Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process , Unlawful Detention, Defamation?
The Court refuses to sentence and resentence to the fraud-based plea bargain Counts II and III, they instead sentenced and resentenced to Dismissed Count I for up to 20 years, and Count II to 2-4 years. THEY REFUSE TO CORRECT IT OR TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THE PROPER DEFENDANT in their denial of a 6.500 Motion for relief of judgment.
Warrantless arrest, warrant based on above butchery of statutes of home, years of detention, decades ordered of online worldwide defamation based on the tampered and enjoined statutes.
The Law, AS WRITTEN, demonstrates the fraud.
there,,is that toned down enough for your TERMS OF SERVICE?
I have emailed every law enforcement agency that seemed relevant, dropped info off at FBI HQ in Bay City over a year ago, contacted Governor Snyder, AG Schuette, every News Outlet i could find email for, etc etc etc Talk to every clerk at the local cops and to the cops and they do NOTHING but threaten jail/prison if I don't comply to the fraud
Department of Attorney General Reviews
Count I: the first 91 words / numbers of MCL 750.145c2 - they deleted the last 61 words which demonstrate it was inapplicable for prosecution. NO VICTIM - NO CRIME.
Count II: Using a computer to violate the half statute MCL 750.145d2f How does half a statute provide jurisdiction to activate computer prohibition statute ?
Counts III & IV: Using a computer to violate a partial title ( title has no effect of law, is not part of the law ) of a permanently enjoined statute : 1999 PA 33 which required commercial gain for selling online products . No victim , no commercial gain , no sales or attempted sales - it was inapplicable for prosecution against ANYONE ON tHE PLANET
How does a partial title validly activate computer prohibition statutes?
Does that qualify for Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process , Unlawful Detention, Defamation?
The Court refuses to sentence and resentence to the fraud-based plea bargain Counts II and III, they instead sentenced and resentenced to Dismissed Count I for up to 20 years, and Count II to 2-4 years. THEY REFUSE TO CORRECT IT OR TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THE PROPER DEFENDANT in their denial of a 6.500 Motion for relief of judgment.
Warrantless arrest, warrant based on above butchery of statutes of home, years of detention, decades ordered of online worldwide defamation based on the tampered and enjoined statutes.
The Law, AS WRITTEN, demonstrates the fraud.
there,,is that toned down enough for your TERMS OF SERVICE?
I have emailed every law enforcement agency that seemed relevant, dropped info off at FBI HQ in Bay City over a year ago, contacted Governor Snyder, AG Schuette, every News Outlet i could find email for, etc etc etc Talk to every clerk at the local cops and to the cops and they do NOTHING but threaten jail/prison if I don't comply to the fraud
It is quite the cover up.