Corsearch is nothing more than a cyber cop who acts as a bounty hunter to remove bona fide listings and legitimate seller listings.
Corsearch casts their nets out as far as they can so they can haul in as many listings as they can to remove them. The bounty hunters are usually paid a fee per listing removed or they get a commission on the billed amount or final amount collected. Corsearch and their bounty hunters hide behind abandon disregard: “fair use”, DMCA, Right of First Sale Doctrine, International exhaustion and the Lanham Act. The bounty hunters have a financial incentive to remove listings so they earn income. Corsearch has a financial incentive to have listings removed so they can pad their billings to their clients.
Corsearch employees cheap and unskilled labor to be the bounty hunters and “busy bee”workers. They have little to no experience in trademark law and put forth no effort to vet or perform due diligence prior to removing a listing.
The cyber cops will always use “we are sorry. It was a mistake. We have retracted the VERO complaint” when a seller produces a contract to them to show privity. Corsearch will never admit they are wrong or made an error. Corsearch will point the finger at their client and blame their client for ordering them to remove the listings when you confront Corsearch and demand answers.
Corsearch is pretty stupid to think they can claim agency as a defense to get out of their actual execution of the fraudulent removal of seller listings thru VERO. This is the equivalent of a murderer pulling the trigger to kill someone and than blaming the hitman when he gets caught by the police. Both are equally and jointly/severally liable under criminal law.
Corsearch will not retract VERO complaints, no matter how much evidence you produce to them and no matter how many times you challenge them and prove them wrong. The only way to get VERO complaints retracted by Corsearch is to file a lawsuit to enjoin Corsearch and their respective client.
Corsearch and cyber cops similar to Corsearch are very unethical bottom feeder companies who prey on mid-range to large brands and convince the brands of their "brilliant idea" to get rid of 3rd party gray market sellers. They don't tell the brands about the unethical and fraudulent tactics they employ to get rid of the listings nor do they tell the brands they commit perjury by attesting to and filing false and fraudulent eBay VERO complaints. Corsearch knows eBay will do nothing to help the VERO'ed seller get the listing reinstated and knows the seller will have to go to court to get a court order to get the listing reinstated.
Corsearch does more damage to brands than they do helping brands. Corsearch is a bottom feeder right there with cyber cop “bounty hunters, trademark attorneys, personal injury attorneys, junk debt collectors, Joel Osteen and family law attorneys. Corsearch has removed bona fide and legitimate seller listings for: HP, HP Ink, Wella, Clairol, Briggs & Stratton, The North Face, and Warner Brothers to name a few.
Stand up to Corsearch. Demand evidence, proof of a test buy, legal theory and legal case law. Speculative and conclusory allegations will not stand up in court nor will they survive a Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgement and you can file a Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions if they try to file a frivolous suite against you. Send 2-3 emails a day. Also email the CEO, CFO and previous CEO.
Watch how fast they go crying and running to “daddy”, their outside attorney, when you stand up to them. Corsearch will not give you any evidence, case law or proof. Corsearch’s outside attorney will just give a long letter full of Attorney “BS”, attorney lies and irrelevant case law. Corsearch’s attorney will refuse to answer your questions, will refuse to produce allegations of fact, will refuse to produce evidence and will try to close the “case” and claim the matter is resolved.
Attorneys get paid to push paper so gotta fill up 4 pages of paper with useless legalese and avoid admitting the truth or any evidence so they can pad their billings to their clients. $3k-$4k letter to say nothing and leave a dispute unresolved is a big waste of money to me.
I have been ordering Corsearch for 2 months to file a lawsuit against me. Have also ordered Corsearch, Corsearch attorneys and Corsearch C-Level execs to file suit, produce evidence, answer my discovery and evidence questions and get the 192 VERO complaints retracted which they falsely and fraudulently removed from my account thru VERO. Corsearch has been too wimpy to even respond to me or take action and provide evidence and proof of parallel imports. They have refused because they know they have no evidence or case against me when they have not even made a “test buy” from me.
Corsearch targets small sellers and banks on them 100% complying and not resisting the item(s). Corsearch also banks on small, weak and vulnerable sellers not having the financial resources to hire legal counsel and not understanding or having knowledge of trademark law. Corsearch and attorneys have to be stood up to by the lions and the lions need to awaken the other lions.
Corsearch is just like trademark attorneys as they try to act all tough and bad until you stand up to them and challenge them. Once you stand up and challenge Corsearch or the trademark attorneys, watch how fast they run and cower down. Trademark bullies and bottom feeders like trademark attorneys, OpSec Security and Corsearch are not used to being challenged. They are used to barking orders and threatening, scaring and intimidating people so they don’t know what to do when they are challenged or stood up to.
Just remember, attorneys get paid big bucks to threaten, scare and intimidate people daily. Family law attorneys accomplish this by threatening to take the kids from the other spouse or threatening to make sure the other spouse gets no property. Trademark attorneys threaten people by sending baseless cease and desist letters, filing baseless lawsuits to get you to settle and by threatening to sue you. 99% of these threats never materialize.
I’m working on a lawsuit to sue Corsearch and enjoin certain employees of Corsearch. Can’t name them because than they will have my posts removed, under European law, for actually naming them by name and calling out for their behavior. European law doesn’t allow this type of free speech like America. Since Corsearch has offices in various parts of Europe, they can report the posts and have them removed.
Corsearch has already reported several of my posts on various forums and gotten them removed. Corsearch doesn’t want the truth to be told about them. Don’t believe me, go read all the negative employee reviews posted on Glassdoor and Indeed. Obviously, Corsearch has to offer incentives and bonuses, like Amazon does, in exchange for insiders and employees to post 5-star reviews to counter the negative.
The opinions and statements stated in this post are my own and constitute free speech and are protected by the First Amendment. The statements in this post are based on my experiences personally dealing with Corsearch, trademark bullying attorneys and cyber cop “bounty hunters”.
Corsearch, Inc. Reviews
Corsearch is nothing more than a cyber cop who acts as a bounty hunter to remove bona fide listings and legitimate seller listings.
Corsearch casts their nets out as far as they can so they can haul in as many listings as they can to remove them. The bounty hunters are usually paid a fee per listing removed or they get a commission on the billed amount or final amount collected. Corsearch and their bounty hunters hide behind abandon disregard: “fair use”, DMCA, Right of First Sale Doctrine, International exhaustion and the Lanham Act. The bounty hunters have a financial incentive to remove listings so they earn income. Corsearch has a financial incentive to have listings removed so they can pad their billings to their clients.
Corsearch employees cheap and unskilled labor to be the bounty hunters and “busy bee”workers. They have little to no experience in trademark law and put forth no effort to vet or perform due diligence prior to removing a listing.
The cyber cops will always use “we are sorry. It was a mistake. We have retracted the VERO complaint” when a seller produces a contract to them to show privity. Corsearch will never admit they are wrong or made an error. Corsearch will point the finger at their client and blame their client for ordering them to remove the listings when you confront Corsearch and demand answers.
Corsearch is pretty stupid to think they can claim agency as a defense to get out of their actual execution of the fraudulent removal of seller listings thru VERO. This is the equivalent of a murderer pulling the trigger to kill someone and than blaming the hitman when he gets caught by the police. Both are equally and jointly/severally liable under criminal law.
Corsearch will not retract VERO complaints, no matter how much evidence you produce to them and no matter how many times you challenge them and prove them wrong. The only way to get VERO complaints retracted by Corsearch is to file a lawsuit to enjoin Corsearch and their respective client.
Corsearch and cyber cops similar to Corsearch are very unethical bottom feeder companies who prey on mid-range to large brands and convince the brands of their "brilliant idea" to get rid of 3rd party gray market sellers. They don't tell the brands about the unethical and fraudulent tactics they employ to get rid of the listings nor do they tell the brands they commit perjury by attesting to and filing false and fraudulent eBay VERO complaints. Corsearch knows eBay will do nothing to help the VERO'ed seller get the listing reinstated and knows the seller will have to go to court to get a court order to get the listing reinstated.
Corsearch does more damage to brands than they do helping brands. Corsearch is a bottom feeder right there with cyber cop “bounty hunters, trademark attorneys, personal injury attorneys, junk debt collectors, Joel Osteen and family law attorneys. Corsearch has removed bona fide and legitimate seller listings for: HP, HP Ink, Wella, Clairol, Briggs & Stratton, The North Face, and Warner Brothers to name a few.
Stand up to Corsearch. Demand evidence, proof of a test buy, legal theory and legal case law. Speculative and conclusory allegations will not stand up in court nor will they survive a Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgement and you can file a Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions if they try to file a frivolous suite against you. Send 2-3 emails a day. Also email the CEO, CFO and previous CEO.
Watch how fast they go crying and running to “daddy”, their outside attorney, when you stand up to them. Corsearch will not give you any evidence, case law or proof. Corsearch’s outside attorney will just give a long letter full of Attorney “BS”, attorney lies and irrelevant case law. Corsearch’s attorney will refuse to answer your questions, will refuse to produce allegations of fact, will refuse to produce evidence and will try to close the “case” and claim the matter is resolved.
Attorneys get paid to push paper so gotta fill up 4 pages of paper with useless legalese and avoid admitting the truth or any evidence so they can pad their billings to their clients. $3k-$4k letter to say nothing and leave a dispute unresolved is a big waste of money to me.
I have been ordering Corsearch for 2 months to file a lawsuit against me. Have also ordered Corsearch, Corsearch attorneys and Corsearch C-Level execs to file suit, produce evidence, answer my discovery and evidence questions and get the 192 VERO complaints retracted which they falsely and fraudulently removed from my account thru VERO. Corsearch has been too wimpy to even respond to me or take action and provide evidence and proof of parallel imports. They have refused because they know they have no evidence or case against me when they have not even made a “test buy” from me.
Corsearch targets small sellers and banks on them 100% complying and not resisting the item(s). Corsearch also banks on small, weak and vulnerable sellers not having the financial resources to hire legal counsel and not understanding or having knowledge of trademark law. Corsearch and attorneys have to be stood up to by the lions and the lions need to awaken the other lions.
Corsearch is just like trademark attorneys as they try to act all tough and bad until you stand up to them and challenge them. Once you stand up and challenge Corsearch or the trademark attorneys, watch how fast they run and cower down. Trademark bullies and bottom feeders like trademark attorneys, OpSec Security and Corsearch are not used to being challenged. They are used to barking orders and threatening, scaring and intimidating people so they don’t know what to do when they are challenged or stood up to.
Just remember, attorneys get paid big bucks to threaten, scare and intimidate people daily. Family law attorneys accomplish this by threatening to take the kids from the other spouse or threatening to make sure the other spouse gets no property. Trademark attorneys threaten people by sending baseless cease and desist letters, filing baseless lawsuits to get you to settle and by threatening to sue you. 99% of these threats never materialize.
I’m working on a lawsuit to sue Corsearch and enjoin certain employees of Corsearch. Can’t name them because than they will have my posts removed, under European law, for actually naming them by name and calling out for their behavior. European law doesn’t allow this type of free speech like America. Since Corsearch has offices in various parts of Europe, they can report the posts and have them removed.
Corsearch has already reported several of my posts on various forums and gotten them removed. Corsearch doesn’t want the truth to be told about them. Don’t believe me, go read all the negative employee reviews posted on Glassdoor and Indeed. Obviously, Corsearch has to offer incentives and bonuses, like Amazon does, in exchange for insiders and employees to post 5-star reviews to counter the negative.
The opinions and statements stated in this post are my own and constitute free speech and are protected by the First Amendment. The statements in this post are based on my experiences personally dealing with Corsearch, trademark bullying attorneys and cyber cop “bounty hunters”.