Federal Trade Commission v. Grand Teton Professionals, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company; 99th Floor LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Mait Management Inc., a New York corporation; Demand Dynamics, a Florida limited liability company; Atomium Corps Inc., a Wyoming corporation; Atomium Corps Inc., a Colorado corporation; Startup Masters NJ Inc., a Wyoming corporation; Startup Masters NJ Inc., a New Jersey corporation; First Incorporation Services Inc., a Wyoming corporation; First Incorporation Services Inc., a Florida corporation; Douglas C. Filter, in his individual and corporate capacity; and Marcio G. Andrade, in his individual and corporate capacity
At the Federal Trade Commission’s request, a federal court has temporarily halted and frozen the assets of Grand Teton Professionals, an alleged credit repair scheme that charged illegal upfront fees and falsely claimed to repair consumers’ credit. The company and other defendants are charged with violating the FTC Act and several provisions of the Credit Repair Organizations Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, the Consumer Review Fairness Act, the Truth in Lending Act, and the Electronic Funds Transfer Act.
Corporate Cash Credit Reviews
Federal Trade Commission v. Grand Teton Professionals, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company; 99th Floor LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Mait Management Inc., a New York corporation; Demand Dynamics, a Florida limited liability company; Atomium Corps Inc., a Wyoming corporation; Atomium Corps Inc., a Colorado corporation; Startup Masters NJ Inc., a Wyoming corporation; Startup Masters NJ Inc., a New Jersey corporation; First Incorporation Services Inc., a Wyoming corporation; First Incorporation Services Inc., a Florida corporation; Douglas C. Filter, in his individual and corporate capacity; and Marcio G. Andrade, in his individual and corporate capacity
At the Federal Trade Commission’s request, a federal court has temporarily halted and frozen the assets of Grand Teton Professionals, an alleged credit repair scheme that charged illegal upfront fees and falsely claimed to repair consumers’ credit. The company and other defendants are charged with violating the FTC Act and several provisions of the Credit Repair Organizations Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, the Consumer Review Fairness Act, the Truth in Lending Act, and the Electronic Funds Transfer Act.