Markus Snedaker of Capital Home Services recently inspected my home for a potential buyer. Two significant items mentioned in his report were grossly innacurate and cost me the sale of my home to my potential buyer. By incompetently identifying two satisfactory items as Major Issues in his report, Markus Snedaker's gross negligent acts have caused the potential buyers to experience grave concerns about purchasing my home and backed out of the deal. Markus Snedaker did not even write a complete home inspection, rather just a letter filled with his quote on quote suspicions.
First, Markus Snedaker stated that my attic and crawl space had significant mold growth which i had re-inspected by professionals and there was not enough mold in the crawlspace to mitigate and the staining on the solid plank sheating in the attic was due to asphalt roof shingle stains and not considered excessive mold growth. Within 48 hours of the inspection, 2 separate mold assessors arrived to review the crawlspace and the attic as per Markus Snedaker's recommendations he made in his letter to our buyer.
Both companies agreed that the crawlspace and the attic was in satisfactory condition and not needing immediate mold mitigation, especially as there are no pathways to the occupents of the home and that there was not enough mold growth for it to be considered excessive mold growth. In addition, Markus Snedaker stated in his report that the new construction work that was done in my basement was improperly installed and was not just suspicuous, but "very" suspicious.
The very next day, an independent contractor reviewed the repairs in the crawlspace and deemed that no structual work is needed to the crawlspace of my home. The crawlspace work was found to be in good shape. It is one thing to not be sure about an issue and recommend review; but it was inexcusable for Markus Snedaker to present himself as an expert and give completely false information to the client. Both eronneous issues were classified in the report as Major Items (which are expenses of $1500 or more to repair or replace). This gross negligence has lead to a loss of sale in the selling of my home and the purchasing of my new home. If Markus Snedaker disputes this, I would be glad to show his report followed by the findings of the various professionals that were called in immediately to correct his grossly negligent review of my home.
Capital Home Services, LLC. Reviews
Markus Snedaker of Capital Home Services recently inspected my home for a potential buyer. Two significant items mentioned in his report were grossly innacurate and cost me the sale of my home to my potential buyer. By incompetently identifying two satisfactory items as Major Issues in his report, Markus Snedaker's gross negligent acts have caused the potential buyers to experience grave concerns about purchasing my home and backed out of the deal. Markus Snedaker did not even write a complete home inspection, rather just a letter filled with his quote on quote suspicions.
First, Markus Snedaker stated that my attic and crawl space had significant mold growth which i had re-inspected by professionals and there was not enough mold in the crawlspace to mitigate and the staining on the solid plank sheating in the attic was due to asphalt roof shingle stains and not considered excessive mold growth. Within 48 hours of the inspection, 2 separate mold assessors arrived to review the crawlspace and the attic as per Markus Snedaker's recommendations he made in his letter to our buyer.
Both companies agreed that the crawlspace and the attic was in satisfactory condition and not needing immediate mold mitigation, especially as there are no pathways to the occupents of the home and that there was not enough mold growth for it to be considered excessive mold growth. In addition, Markus Snedaker stated in his report that the new construction work that was done in my basement was improperly installed and was not just suspicuous, but "very" suspicious.
The very next day, an independent contractor reviewed the repairs in the crawlspace and deemed that no structual work is needed to the crawlspace of my home. The crawlspace work was found to be in good shape. It is one thing to not be sure about an issue and recommend review; but it was inexcusable for Markus Snedaker to present himself as an expert and give completely false information to the client. Both eronneous issues were classified in the report as Major Items (which are expenses of $1500 or more to repair or replace). This gross negligence has lead to a loss of sale in the selling of my home and the purchasing of my new home. If Markus Snedaker disputes this, I would be glad to show his report followed by the findings of the various professionals that were called in immediately to correct his grossly negligent review of my home.