I met Mark Rajai on Tinder. I was living in Pennsylvania, he was in LA. After about a day of texting Mark told me he loved me. Lol, I immediately thought that was really strange but I figured you know, some people actually believe in love at first site. We continued to text and facetime almost everyday for about a month and he continuously told me to show him my body, which I did. I liked him and I wanted to keep him around.
Around the middle of March 2018, Dr. Mark Rajai decided to fly me out to California to see him. I had to get an uber, a 3 hour train, and pay for my checked bag, but I didn’t at all mind losing that money since Mark REPEATEDLY told me that he would pay me back once I got to him. I was genuinely excited to see Mark Rajai. When I got there I was starving and exhausted, but he didn’t care at all. We went directly to his house, he gave me a bowl of stale cereal, and we went to his room because he wanted to have sex with me. I was really irritated, but I did it anyway since he brought me out here and everything. So, the next day (and everyday) we literally just sat in his house while he read Yahoo news all day. I would try to sit next to him and have us bond over that, but after a few minutes he would get up and go to another room. I was really confused and kind of hurt since he was so nice and compassionate over the phone. I tried to get him to go out with me so I could see LA, i’ve never been there. He didn’t want to do that either. I have one friend there in LA and once I told him that he repeatedly asked me to have her come over and see if she wanted to move in with "us”. This girl was 17 and still in high school and I’m 18, barely out of high school.
After about 3 days of us barely talking, the only "bonding” we had was in bed. I didn’t like that at all. I told Mark how I felt, lonely, a bit used, and I just wasn’t happy. He talked about having me move here with him and I explained to him that I didn’t think it would work at all. Mark lost it. He kept saying it was his spring break and he could have many young girls over there with him since he was rich, he told me I was crazy for turning him down, and that he wasn’t even attracted to me. At that point I didn’t really feel safe there with him yelling and threatening, so I started looking for a place to stay. He stopped yelling for a few minutes the case to me and told me that I was going to "make it up to him” no matter what I said.
At this point, Dr. Mark Rajai is threatening to rape me. I was so scared and I didn’t have any other place to go. I tried to talk to him and let him know that I didn’t mean it the way he’s taking it and I also told him I didn’t want to have sex with him. Mark told me that I need to leave because his ex girlfriend is coming over. I was completely shocked and disgusted. Why is he treating me like this. So I left.
I spent my last bit of money on a place to sleep for 2 nights until it was time for me to go home. I texted Mark and asked him for the confirmation number on my plane ticket and he said he would tell me the day of my flight, because he doesn’t know if he’s going to cancel it or not. It was the night before my flight, I had to check out the next morning and I had about $100 to buy a $600 plane ticket. All I could do when he told me that was cry. I was so disgusted with him and even myself. How and why did I fall for this foolishness. The day of my flight comes and i haven’t heard anything from Mark Rajai, so i call the airlines and i get my confirmation number with no problem. I get to the airport to check in and my confirmation number is invalid. I call Mark and he told me he canceled my flight home, 2 hours before i’m scheduled to leave. I literally couldn’t believe it. I was homeless for a night and i spent almost all i had on a place to sleep. After about 3 days, I was able to find an affordable flight home and I couldn’t be happier.
Moral of the story is: Dr. Mark Rajai is a horrible person. You may get fooled by his lil accent, but under that front he is a horrible man. After all of this he kept trying to convince me that he is a nice man, I can’t understand how he could still think that after all he’s put me through. Sounds like a bit of insecurity covered up by narcissism, which sounds a bit nuts, but perfectly describes Mark Rajai. Hope another young girl doesn’t get left for dead by this man or any man in that matter. Good luck, hope you learned something
You actually put this on the wrong college website. Mark Rajai works at CSUN California State University of Northridge as an engineering Professor. I think that is horrible what happened to you. And I'm sure that was not the first time Mark Rajai has done that.
The Board of Trustees is responsible for the oversight of the California State University. The Board adopts rules, regulations, and policies governing the California State University. The Board has authority over curricular development, use of property, development of facilities, and fiscal and human resources management.
The Donahoe Act - which grew out of the recommendations of A Master Plan for Higher Education in California, 1960-1975 - became Division 16.5 of the California Education Code. Along with Division 18, it defines the composition, appointments, terms, powers, and functions of the Board of Trustees.
Section 89030 of the Code provides that "the Trustees shall adopt rules and regulations not inconsistent with the laws of this State for: a) the government of the trustees, b) the government of their appointees and employees, c) the government of the California State University." Section 66607 stipulates that "The California State University shall be entirely independent of all political and sectarian influence and kept free therefrom in the appointment of its trustees and in the administration of its affairs."
CSU students & faculty: don’t bother attempting to report to the Board of Trustees (BOT) they are too busy overseeing the vast CSU system to hear and respond to CSU students. For over three years calls, emails, and formal notices have been ignored by the BOT. All board members are also unavailable to locate in their public or private positions directly. It’s an insulated group, which is untethered from it's legislative leash.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 1
August 2, 2016
Jake \
10 / King Salamon
Al Khobar, Eastern Province Saudi Arabia
Monday, 02 August, 2016
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Board of Trustees
Office of the Chancellor
401 Golden Shore
Long Beach, California 908024210
RE: Executive Order 1063: ALLEGATIONS: Minimum of Three International Diploma Mills, Obstruction of Justice, Witness Tampering. Failure to Report Fiscal Improprieties, Collusion, Fraudulent International Student Visas, State Records Tampering, WASC Senior Collusion & Fraud, Fraudulent CSUSB Re Accreditation, Violations of Executive Orders and Formal Grievance Procedures, Misusing Campus Police Resources & Personnel, Concealing Fraud Allegations since Dec. 2013, Misuse of State Resources, “Selling” CSU to Foreign Nationals.
EO 1063:
This executive order fulfills the requirements of the Higher Education Act Title IV, 34 Code of Federal Regulations sections 600.9(a)(1)(i)(A) and 668.43(b), by establishing a complaint procedure for CSU students and student applicants alleging that the CSU has violated one or more state laws, where there is no other applicable CSU complaint procedure.
This is an Executive Order No. 1063, complaint alleging that the California State University, Cal State San Bernardino and Western Association of Senior College Accreditation (WASC) violated state laws from 2013 to 2016. That CSU officials through numerous state law violations have operated and concealed at least three international diploma mills. This student, Robert Green and at least one state employee have made multiple reports of the academic fraud to state officials, state law enforcement, WASC Senior, the Council for Higher Education (CHEA), CSUSB Faculty Senate, and CSU Board of Trustees.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 2
August 2, 2016
1)July 6, 2016, via a widespread CSUSB campus listser, a retired state employee made detailed admissions of a Chinese diploma mill.
2)A fraud criminal complaint was issued (July 23, 2016) to the CSUSB campus Chief Jamsen and other law enforcement. A Chancellor’s office public official, Linda Hanson, flipped that criminal complaint into a whistleblower complaint that CSU then rejected. This fits an established pattern from January 2013, of CSU officials acting poorly and violating executive orders, reporting requirements and subverting their roles as public officials, while the diploma mills unabashedly operate.
3)Just discovered that CSU & CSUSB officials as public officials created a diversion of willful obstruction, state records tampering and manufactured facts from Dec. 2013, to the current date. The purpose of the diversion was to conceal the fraud allegations and attack the complainant. This ongoing diversionary and subversion scheme has actively operated from 2013, to the current date. At some point, the chancellor’s office became complicit. These public officials actions waive EO 1063, 30day reporting requirements under federal law, as all acts to date are a continuation of prior acts to conceal the international diploma mill frauds allegation. See Feb. 2015, summary narrative to the Calif. Department of Justice (attached).
Jacob T. Wallace, SID 004483751, 10 / King Salamon Al Khobar, Eastern Province Saudi Arabia 9660545820567
2.The term and year of the complainant's last active academic status or the term and year the complainant sought admission to the university.
Spring 2012
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 3
August 2, 2016
3.A detailed description of the specific actions that constituted the alleged violation of one or more state laws, including the specific law or laws alleged to have been violated and, if known, the name(s) and title(s) of the responsible CSU employee(s).
●July 5, 2016, former state CSUSB employee sent out an email on the campus listserv and made admissions of a diploma mill, academic and financial fraud with unidentified Chinese agents and the CSUSB office of the president. See EO 1140 aka 1104.
●Chinese students submitted fraudulent transcripts solicited by CSUSB, which is a pattern of WASC accreditation violations and state law violations.
●Chinese students are taking 33 units per quarter or semester, which is ludicrous.
●Chinese agents & public officials operate CSUSB outside of the control, laws and standards of the CSU, WASC accreditation, state and federal laws for personal financial gain, prestige, and international travel.
●“Sold” units and degrees for cash, Chinese agents & CSUSB officials collected the illegal receipts of cash, internationally wired the monies, expended the money and profited from the fraud.
●CSUSB state officials knowingly issued international US education visas to coconspirators after illicitly creating a fraudulent admissions and diploma mill scheme outside and inside of the US.
●South Korean, Vietnamese, Chinese nationals entered or will enter the US territories on false and misleading visa applications to participate in the academic fraud after paying cash to Chinese agents and state public officials operating the diploma mills. Korean students on campus now, Chinese students arriving in the Fall.
●The chancellor’s office overseeing the state police on the San Bernardino campus mishandled a criminal complaint duly filed on July 23, 2016. That criminal complaint was flipped into a whistleblower complaint by the office of the chancellor, who then rejected their own complaint manipulation mechanism.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 4
August 2, 2016
●Projected violations of State and Federal Statute
*18 of Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a)
* RICO criminal statute (18 U .S.C.A.§ 1963) in a scheme to illegally generate income for themselves and others through a pattern of extortion, favoritism, improper influence, personal selfenrichment, selfdealing, concealment and conflict of interest
*Criminal Enterprise Act (21 U.S.C. §848)
*Cal Gov Code § 82048
(a) "Public official" means every member, officer, employee or consultant of a state or local government agency.
*Cal. Gov Code §§ 87100, 87103 Conflict of interest
*Cal. Gov. Code §1090 Self dealing (contractual conflict of interest)
*Cal. Gov. Code §8314; Use of public resources for private or political purposes
*Cal. Pen Code §424 Misappropriation of public funds
*The Public Record Act: Cal. Gov. Code §§625070; Cal Gov. Code §§3409034090.8 Failure to retain public Records and/or failure to allow public access to public records
*Common law and constitutional notions of due process
Failure to treat all members of the public in a fair and unbiased manner *18 U.S. Code § 641 Public money, property or records
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 5
August 2, 2016
4. The date(s) the alleged improper activities occurred or the condition developed.
The MA TESOL program since its inception in 2009, was solely designed and marketed for South Korean students by Lynn Diaz Ricco. 2009 to this date, state officials operate this diploma mill through a backdoor admissions fraud which includes an in house English assessment system used in the candidates home unmonitored, as opposed to internationally recognized assessments like IELTS.
State officials willfully accepted foreign MA candidates who had a baccalaureate from Korean taken in the Korean language. Korean candidates were then expected to perform highly rigorous master's level academic English work, when state officials knew they were incapable of said work because those officials had established a backdoor admissions process that was fraudulent and violates their WASC accreditation. In the left hand, state officials were advising students about plagiarism and academic dishonesty, and with the right hand, the same officials were subverting those standards through their fraud scheme. Turnitin, plagiarism software was disabled. These CSUSB public officials then created a watered down curriculum and set the stage for academic dishonesty and plagiarism. The Vietnamese MBA program operates the same. (see Feb. 22, 2014; Academic Formal Grievances attached. Note that there is also a non academic formal grievance, both were never processed and investigated even though the CSU chancellor’s office noticed San Bernardino officials (March 2014) of their obligations to act.
MA TESOL professor’s ignored several emails that outlined student academic misconduct that would be actionable under the college's plagiarism and academic honesty policies. An informal complaint was mishandled by Sandra Vasquez and Tainta Karmanova (Jan. 2015). Korean students should have been subjected to investigation, suspension and a suspension hearing. Instead, these public officials attacked US citizens and created a diversionary scheme to protect the illegal admissions scheme and the retention of the cash paying Koreans at the expense of the American students, who academically covered for the Koreans. The American’s education was swindled through the majority of Korean students that did not have an academic command of English. In a wrenching twist, the masters program instructed us that ESL students need at least five years of secondary academic English study to meet an ‘academic proficiency status’. CSUSB has awarded master's level education degrees to countless Koreans and other international students who are not at the masters level. Thereby, ruining the authenticity and stated standards of the degrees held by US citizens.
The Board of Trustees is responsible for the oversight of the California State University. The Board adopts rules, regulations, and policies governing the California State University. The Board has authority over curricular development, use of property, development of facilities, and fiscal and human resources management.
The Donahoe Act - which grew out of the recommendations of A Master Plan for Higher Education in California, 1960-1975 - became Division 16.5 of the California Education Code. Along with Division 18, it defines the composition, appointments, terms, powers, and functions of the Board of Trustees.
Section 89030 of the Code provides that "the Trustees shall adopt rules and regulations not inconsistent with the laws of this State for: a) the government of the trustees, b) the government of their appointees and employees, c) the government of the California State University." Section 66607 stipulates that "The California State University shall be entirely independent of all political and sectarian influence and kept free therefrom in the appointment of its trustees and in the administration of its affairs."
CSU students & faculty: don’t bother attempting to report to the Board of Trustees (BOT) they are too busy overseeing the vast CSU system to hear and respond to CSU students. For over three years calls, emails, and formal notices have been ignored by the BOT. All board members are also unavailable to locate in their public or private positions directly. It’s an insulated group, which is untethered from it's legislative leash.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 1
August 2, 2016
Jake \
10 / King Salamon
Al Khobar, Eastern Province Saudi Arabia
Monday, 02 August, 2016
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Board of Trustees
Office of the Chancellor
401 Golden Shore
Long Beach, California 908024210
RE: Executive Order 1063: ALLEGATIONS: Minimum of Three International Diploma Mills, Obstruction of Justice, Witness Tampering. Failure to Report Fiscal Improprieties, Collusion, Fraudulent International Student Visas, State Records Tampering, WASC Senior Collusion & Fraud, Fraudulent CSUSB Re Accreditation, Violations of Executive Orders and Formal Grievance Procedures, Misusing Campus Police Resources & Personnel, Concealing Fraud Allegations since Dec. 2013, Misuse of State Resources, “Selling” CSU to Foreign Nationals.
EO 1063:
This executive order fulfills the requirements of the Higher Education Act Title IV, 34 Code of Federal Regulations sections 600.9(a)(1)(i)(A) and 668.43(b), by establishing a complaint procedure for CSU students and student applicants alleging that the CSU has violated one or more state laws, where there is no other applicable CSU complaint procedure.
This is an Executive Order No. 1063, complaint alleging that the California State University, Cal State San Bernardino and Western Association of Senior College Accreditation (WASC) violated state laws from 2013 to 2016. That CSU officials through numerous state law violations have operated and concealed at least three international diploma mills. This student, Robert Green and at least one state employee have made multiple reports of the academic fraud to state officials, state law enforcement, WASC Senior, the Council for Higher Education (CHEA), CSUSB Faculty Senate, and CSU Board of Trustees.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 2
August 2, 2016
1)July 6, 2016, via a widespread CSUSB campus listser, a retired state employee made detailed admissions of a Chinese diploma mill.
2)A fraud criminal complaint was issued (July 23, 2016) to the CSUSB campus Chief Jamsen and other law enforcement. A Chancellor’s office public official, Linda Hanson, flipped that criminal complaint into a whistleblower complaint that CSU then rejected. This fits an established pattern from January 2013, of CSU officials acting poorly and violating executive orders, reporting requirements and subverting their roles as public officials, while the diploma mills unabashedly operate.
3)Just discovered that CSU & CSUSB officials as public officials created a diversion of willful obstruction, state records tampering and manufactured facts from Dec. 2013, to the current date. The purpose of the diversion was to conceal the fraud allegations and attack the complainant. This ongoing diversionary and subversion scheme has actively operated from 2013, to the current date. At some point, the chancellor’s office became complicit. These public officials actions waive EO 1063, 30day reporting requirements under federal law, as all acts to date are a continuation of prior acts to conceal the international diploma mill frauds allegation. See Feb. 2015, summary narrative to the Calif. Department of Justice (attached).
Jacob T. Wallace, SID 004483751, 10 / King Salamon Al Khobar, Eastern Province Saudi Arabia 9660545820567
2.The term and year of the complainant's last active academic status or the term and year the complainant sought admission to the university.
Spring 2012
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 3
August 2, 2016
3.A detailed description of the specific actions that constituted the alleged violation of one or more state laws, including the specific law or laws alleged to have been violated and, if known, the name(s) and title(s) of the responsible CSU employee(s).
●July 5, 2016, former state CSUSB employee sent out an email on the campus listserv and made admissions of a diploma mill, academic and financial fraud with unidentified Chinese agents and the CSUSB office of the president. See EO 1140 aka 1104.
●Chinese students submitted fraudulent transcripts solicited by CSUSB, which is a pattern of WASC accreditation violations and state law violations.
●Chinese students are taking 33 units per quarter or semester, which is ludicrous.
●Chinese agents & public officials operate CSUSB outside of the control, laws and standards of the CSU, WASC accreditation, state and federal laws for personal financial gain, prestige, and international travel.
●“Sold” units and degrees for cash, Chinese agents & CSUSB officials collected the illegal receipts of cash, internationally wired the monies, expended the money and profited from the fraud.
●CSUSB state officials knowingly issued international US education visas to coconspirators after illicitly creating a fraudulent admissions and diploma mill scheme outside and inside of the US.
●South Korean, Vietnamese, Chinese nationals entered or will enter the US territories on false and misleading visa applications to participate in the academic fraud after paying cash to Chinese agents and state public officials operating the diploma mills. Korean students on campus now, Chinese students arriving in the Fall.
●The chancellor’s office overseeing the state police on the San Bernardino campus mishandled a criminal complaint duly filed on July 23, 2016. That criminal complaint was flipped into a whistleblower complaint by the office of the chancellor, who then rejected their own complaint manipulation mechanism.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 4
August 2, 2016
●Projected violations of State and Federal Statute
*18 of Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a)
* RICO criminal statute (18 U .S.C.A.§ 1963) in a scheme to illegally generate income for themselves and others through a pattern of extortion, favoritism, improper influence, personal selfenrichment, selfdealing, concealment and conflict of interest
*Criminal Enterprise Act (21 U.S.C. §848)
*Cal Gov Code § 82048
(a) "Public official" means every member, officer, employee or consultant of a state or local government agency.
*Cal. Gov Code §§ 87100, 87103 Conflict of interest
*Cal. Gov. Code §1090 Self dealing (contractual conflict of interest)
*Cal. Gov. Code §8314; Use of public resources for private or political purposes
*Cal. Pen Code §424 Misappropriation of public funds
*The Public Record Act: Cal. Gov. Code §§625070; Cal Gov. Code §§3409034090.8 Failure to retain public Records and/or failure to allow public access to public records
*Common law and constitutional notions of due process
Failure to treat all members of the public in a fair and unbiased manner *18 U.S. Code § 641 Public money, property or records
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 5
August 2, 2016
4. The date(s) the alleged improper activities occurred or the condition developed.
The MA TESOL program since its inception in 2009, was solely designed and marketed for South Korean students by Lynn Diaz Ricco. 2009 to this date, state officials operate this diploma mill through a backdoor admissions fraud which includes an in house English assessment system used in the candidates home unmonitored, as opposed to internationally recognized assessments like IELTS.
State officials willfully accepted foreign MA candidates who had a baccalaureate from Korean taken in the Korean language. Korean candidates were then expected to perform highly rigorous master's level academic English work, when state officials knew they were incapable of said work because those officials had established a backdoor admissions process that was fraudulent and violates their WASC accreditation. In the left hand, state officials were advising students about plagiarism and academic dishonesty, and with the right hand, the same officials were subverting those standards through their fraud scheme. Turnitin, plagiarism software was disabled. These CSUSB public officials then created a watered down curriculum and set the stage for academic dishonesty and plagiarism. The Vietnamese MBA program operates the same. (see Feb. 22, 2014; Academic Formal Grievances attached. Note that there is also a non academic formal grievance, both were never processed and investigated even though the CSU chancellor’s office noticed San Bernardino officials (March 2014) of their obligations to act.
MA TESOL professor’s ignored several emails that outlined student academic misconduct that would be actionable under the college's plagiarism and academic honesty policies. An informal complaint was mishandled by Sandra Vasquez and Tainta Karmanova (Jan. 2015). Korean students should have been subjected to investigation, suspension and a suspension hearing. Instead, these public officials attacked US citizens and created a diversionary scheme to protect the illegal admissions scheme and the retention of the cash paying Koreans at the expense of the American students, who academically covered for the Koreans. The American’s education was swindled through the majority of Korean students that did not have an academic command of English. In a wrenching twist, the masters program instructed us that ESL students need at least five years of secondary academic English study to meet an ‘academic proficiency status’. CSUSB has awarded master's level education degrees to countless Koreans and other international students who are not at the masters level. Thereby, ruining the authenticity and stated standards of the degrees held by US citizens.
Regards,
Jake
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 6
August 2, 2016
5.A list of witnesses, if any, including their contact information and the facts known by each.
a)Student witnesses cited in the Feb. 22, 2014, uninvestigated two formal grievances.
b)State employee identified in the July 5, 2016, email listserv
c)All US born students in the program from 2009 to current.
d)State employees that were harassed and forced to participate in the fraud. DHR, Cesar Portillo and Douglas Freer.
6.Copies of any documentary evidence that supports the complaint. Descriptions of documents that support the complaint and, if known, where the documents are maintained and by whom if the actual documents are not in the possession of the complainant.
a)DOJ investigation and the 800 pages reviewed.
b)DOJ Feb 2015, narrative.
c)All emails and executive orders, grievances and communication from Dec. 2013 to current to CSUSB and CSU.
d)All emails, complaints with WASC and the WASC file.
e)All WASC agenda and board meetings from 2013 to current.
f)CSUSB campus criminal reporting and investigations from 2013 to current.
g)Four CSU presidents sit as WASC commissioners and act as the employer of WASC personnel that ‘independently’ regulate and accredit CSU. Vet these public officials conduct as WASC commissioners.
h)All letters generated by the office of the chancellor.
i)All letters generated from the office of the president CSUSB.
j)Access the foreign agents in China, Korea and Vietnam.
k)EO 1140 (1104) Fiscal Improprieties
l)CSU Sept 17, 2015 (complaint letter)
m)Feb. 22, 2014, formal academic grievance
n)WASC FOIA request.
o)Chancellor’s feedback, review and praise of the CSUSB president in late 2015, after the Korean fraud was concealed.
7.Signed under penalty of perjury, Tuesday, the Second Day of August, Two Thousand and Sixteen; the Day of our Lord.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 7
August 2, 2016
Conspirators and Co Conspirators:
CSUSB Campus
Tomas Morales
Bryan Haynes
Sandra Vasquez
Andrew Bodman
Jim Brown (ret) Milton Clark Tainta Karmanova Jack Pauduntin Ron Chen
Alysson Satterlund Lynn Diaz Ricco
Unidentified South Korean, Vietnamese, Chinese students from 2009, onwards.
California State University: Office of the Chancellor
Timothy White
Linda Hanson
Mark Crase
Cynthia Conway
Virjee Framroze
Lori Lamb
California State University Concurrently Actings as WASC Senior College and University Accreditation, Commissioners
Jeffrey Armstrong, President, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Janna Bersi, Professor, California State University, Dominguez Hills William Covino, President of California State University, Los Angeles Mildred García, president of California State University, Fullerton Dianne F. Harrison, president of California State University, Northridge
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 8
August 2, 2016
California State University is accredited by the Senior College Commission of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC). WASC is an institutional accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. This federallyrecognized body provides assurance to students, parents and all stakeholders that CSU meets clear quality standards for educational and financial performance
Pursuant to the United States Department of Education's Program Integrity Rule, each institution of higher education is required to provide all prospective and current students with the contact information for the state agency or agencies that handle complaints against postsecondary education institutions offering distance learning within that state.
●CSUSB failed to meet this requirement. Additional allegation.
We Californian's love our state, there's no better perptartor of misconduct than our public officlas. Here we have CSUSB including state residents in a diploma mill scheme and awarding/recieving federal student loans dollars fraudlently.
Re: Allegations of a Korean & Chinese Diploma Mill on the California State University, San Bernardino campus, satellite classrooms in China and online.
I am unable to report through the following link: https://feedback.studentaid.ed.gov/Feedback, due to either a connectivity problem or website issue.
Western Association of Schools & Colleges, (WASC Senior) the accrediting and investigative agency for CSUSB has failed to conduct an appropriate investigation of the Korean scheme. Three California State University campus presidents sit as WASB board members. A Chinese diploma mill was was reported in July 2016, a CSUSB WASC liaison was accused of operating that scheme with WASC’ knowledge. Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) has been non responsive and acts as a federally recognized governing body over WASC.
I am reporting that the Master's program I am currently enrolled in has substantial plagiarism and academic dishonesty taking place. 70% of the student body are Koreans, some made admissions of a backdoor admission policy. They also had limited English command at the master's level and did not take international standards level exams for admittance into such a program. CSUSB officials mishandled several formal complaint processes, as did their accreditation institution, WASC Senior, and the CSU chancellor's office. I was blocked from access to the CSU Board of Trustees.
I was suspended for nine months after I reported and pursued the allegations. CSUSB manufactured misconduct allegations that were never formally and honestly handled. I should have completed in early 2015. CUSB altered state records with witness intimidation in a series of acts to never investigate and conceal the allegations. In July 2016, a 29-year employee made admissions of another diploma mill involving Chinese students that the employee attempted to end. There are numerous documents and communications outlining these issues.
I allege that the CSUSB’s formal request for FSA was fraudulent as CSUSB either knew or should have known of the Korean MA TESOL diploma scheme. That CSUSB has utilized public resources, time and their positions as public officials to not investigate the diploma mill accusations. In addition, international student visas would have been falsely issued through CSUSB. I allege that I also fraudulently received FSA as an unwitting actor in CSUSB’s financial and academic plan to bootstrap their independently funded, College of Extended Learning, through these diploma mills.
I am requesting a formal investigation conducted by the Office of Inspector General, and not by WASC or CHEA. Email is the best way to communicate with me.
We Californian's love our state, there's no better perptartor of misconduct than our public officlas. Here we have CSUSB including state residents in a diploma mill scheme and awarding/recieving federal student loans dollars fraudlently.
Re: Allegations of a Korean & Chinese Diploma Mill on the California State University, San Bernardino campus, satellite classrooms in China and online.
I am unable to report through the following link: https://feedback.studentaid.ed.gov/Feedback, due to either a connectivity problem or website issue.
Western Association of Schools & Colleges, (WASC Senior) the accrediting and investigative agency for CSUSB has failed to conduct an appropriate investigation of the Korean scheme. Three California State University campus presidents sit as WASB board members. A Chinese diploma mill was was reported in July 2016, a CSUSB WASC liaison was accused of operating that scheme with WASC’ knowledge. Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) has been non responsive and acts as a federally recognized governing body over WASC.
I am reporting that the Master's program I am currently enrolled in has substantial plagiarism and academic dishonesty taking place. 70% of the student body are Koreans, some made admissions of a backdoor admission policy. They also had limited English command at the master's level and did not take international standards level exams for admittance into such a program. CSUSB officials mishandled several formal complaint processes, as did their accreditation institution, WASC Senior, and the CSU chancellor's office. I was blocked from access to the CSU Board of Trustees.
I was suspended for nine months after I reported and pursued the allegations. CSUSB manufactured misconduct allegations that were never formally and honestly handled. I should have completed in early 2015. CUSB altered state records with witness intimidation in a series of acts to never investigate and conceal the allegations. In July 2016, a 29-year employee made admissions of another diploma mill involving Chinese students that the employee attempted to end. There are numerous documents and communications outlining these issues.
I allege that the CSUSB’s formal request for FSA was fraudulent as CSUSB either knew or should have known of the Korean MA TESOL diploma scheme. That CSUSB has utilized public resources, time and their positions as public officials to not investigate the diploma mill accusations. In addition, international student visas would have been falsely issued through CSUSB. I allege that I also fraudulently received FSA as an unwitting actor in CSUSB’s financial and academic plan to bootstrap their independently funded, College of Extended Learning, through these diploma mills.
I am requesting a formal investigation conducted by the Office of Inspector General, and not by WASC or CHEA. Email is the best way to communicate with me.
California State University Reviews
I met Mark Rajai on Tinder. I was living in Pennsylvania, he was in LA. After about a day of texting Mark told me he loved me. Lol, I immediately thought that was really strange but I figured you know, some people actually believe in love at first site. We continued to text and facetime almost everyday for about a month and he continuously told me to show him my body, which I did. I liked him and I wanted to keep him around.
Around the middle of March 2018, Dr. Mark Rajai decided to fly me out to California to see him. I had to get an uber, a 3 hour train, and pay for my checked bag, but I didn’t at all mind losing that money since Mark REPEATEDLY told me that he would pay me back once I got to him. I was genuinely excited to see Mark Rajai. When I got there I was starving and exhausted, but he didn’t care at all. We went directly to his house, he gave me a bowl of stale cereal, and we went to his room because he wanted to have sex with me. I was really irritated, but I did it anyway since he brought me out here and everything. So, the next day (and everyday) we literally just sat in his house while he read Yahoo news all day. I would try to sit next to him and have us bond over that, but after a few minutes he would get up and go to another room. I was really confused and kind of hurt since he was so nice and compassionate over the phone. I tried to get him to go out with me so I could see LA, i’ve never been there. He didn’t want to do that either. I have one friend there in LA and once I told him that he repeatedly asked me to have her come over and see if she wanted to move in with "us”. This girl was 17 and still in high school and I’m 18, barely out of high school.
After about 3 days of us barely talking, the only "bonding” we had was in bed. I didn’t like that at all. I told Mark how I felt, lonely, a bit used, and I just wasn’t happy. He talked about having me move here with him and I explained to him that I didn’t think it would work at all. Mark lost it. He kept saying it was his spring break and he could have many young girls over there with him since he was rich, he told me I was crazy for turning him down, and that he wasn’t even attracted to me. At that point I didn’t really feel safe there with him yelling and threatening, so I started looking for a place to stay. He stopped yelling for a few minutes the case to me and told me that I was going to "make it up to him” no matter what I said.
At this point, Dr. Mark Rajai is threatening to rape me. I was so scared and I didn’t have any other place to go. I tried to talk to him and let him know that I didn’t mean it the way he’s taking it and I also told him I didn’t want to have sex with him. Mark told me that I need to leave because his ex girlfriend is coming over. I was completely shocked and disgusted. Why is he treating me like this. So I left.
I spent my last bit of money on a place to sleep for 2 nights until it was time for me to go home. I texted Mark and asked him for the confirmation number on my plane ticket and he said he would tell me the day of my flight, because he doesn’t know if he’s going to cancel it or not. It was the night before my flight, I had to check out the next morning and I had about $100 to buy a $600 plane ticket. All I could do when he told me that was cry. I was so disgusted with him and even myself. How and why did I fall for this foolishness. The day of my flight comes and i haven’t heard anything from Mark Rajai, so i call the airlines and i get my confirmation number with no problem. I get to the airport to check in and my confirmation number is invalid. I call Mark and he told me he canceled my flight home, 2 hours before i’m scheduled to leave. I literally couldn’t believe it. I was homeless for a night and i spent almost all i had on a place to sleep. After about 3 days, I was able to find an affordable flight home and I couldn’t be happier.
Moral of the story is: Dr. Mark Rajai is a horrible person. You may get fooled by his lil accent, but under that front he is a horrible man. After all of this he kept trying to convince me that he is a nice man, I can’t understand how he could still think that after all he’s put me through. Sounds like a bit of insecurity covered up by narcissism, which sounds a bit nuts, but perfectly describes Mark Rajai. Hope another young girl doesn’t get left for dead by this man or any man in that matter. Good luck, hope you learned something
Wrong college
You actually put this on the wrong college website. Mark Rajai works at CSUN California State University of Northridge as an engineering Professor. I think that is horrible what happened to you. And I'm sure that was not the first time Mark Rajai has done that.
The Board of Trustees is responsible for the oversight of the California State University. The Board adopts rules, regulations, and policies governing the California State University. The Board has authority over curricular development, use of property, development of facilities, and fiscal and human resources management.
The Donahoe Act - which grew out of the recommendations of A Master Plan for Higher Education in California, 1960-1975 - became Division 16.5 of the California Education Code. Along with Division 18, it defines the composition, appointments, terms, powers, and functions of the Board of Trustees.
Section 89030 of the Code provides that "the Trustees shall adopt rules and regulations not inconsistent with the laws of this State for: a) the government of the trustees, b) the government of their appointees and employees, c) the government of the California State University." Section 66607 stipulates that "The California State University shall be entirely independent of all political and sectarian influence and kept free therefrom in the appointment of its trustees and in the administration of its affairs."
CSU students & faculty: don’t bother attempting to report to the Board of Trustees (BOT) they are too busy overseeing the vast CSU system to hear and respond to CSU students. For over three years calls, emails, and formal notices have been ignored by the BOT. All board members are also unavailable to locate in their public or private positions directly. It’s an insulated group, which is untethered from it's legislative leash.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 1
August 2, 2016
Jake \
10 / King Salamon
Al Khobar, Eastern Province Saudi Arabia
Monday, 02 August, 2016
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Board of Trustees
Office of the Chancellor
401 Golden Shore
Long Beach, California 908024210
RE: Executive Order 1063: ALLEGATIONS: Minimum of Three International Diploma Mills, Obstruction of Justice, Witness Tampering. Failure to Report Fiscal Improprieties, Collusion, Fraudulent International Student Visas, State Records Tampering, WASC Senior Collusion & Fraud, Fraudulent CSUSB Re Accreditation, Violations of Executive Orders and Formal Grievance Procedures, Misusing Campus Police Resources & Personnel, Concealing Fraud Allegations since Dec. 2013, Misuse of State Resources, “Selling” CSU to Foreign Nationals.
EO 1063:
This executive order fulfills the requirements of the Higher Education Act Title IV, 34 Code of Federal Regulations sections 600.9(a)(1)(i)(A) and 668.43(b), by establishing a complaint procedure for CSU students and student applicants alleging that the CSU has violated one or more state laws, where there is no other applicable CSU complaint procedure.
This is an Executive Order No. 1063, complaint alleging that the California State University, Cal State San Bernardino and Western Association of Senior College Accreditation (WASC) violated state laws from 2013 to 2016. That CSU officials through numerous state law violations have operated and concealed at least three international diploma mills. This student, Robert Green and at least one state employee have made multiple reports of the academic fraud to state officials, state law enforcement, WASC Senior, the Council for Higher Education (CHEA), CSUSB Faculty Senate, and CSU Board of Trustees.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 2
August 2, 2016
1)July 6, 2016, via a widespread CSUSB campus listser, a retired state employee made detailed admissions of a Chinese diploma mill.
2)A fraud criminal complaint was issued (July 23, 2016) to the CSUSB campus Chief Jamsen and other law enforcement. A Chancellor’s office public official, Linda Hanson, flipped that criminal complaint into a whistleblower complaint that CSU then rejected. This fits an established pattern from January 2013, of CSU officials acting poorly and violating executive orders, reporting requirements and subverting their roles as public officials, while the diploma mills unabashedly operate.
3)Just discovered that CSU & CSUSB officials as public officials created a diversion of willful obstruction, state records tampering and manufactured facts from Dec. 2013, to the current date. The purpose of the diversion was to conceal the fraud allegations and attack the complainant. This ongoing diversionary and subversion scheme has actively operated from 2013, to the current date. At some point, the chancellor’s office became complicit. These public officials actions waive EO 1063, 30day reporting requirements under federal law, as all acts to date are a continuation of prior acts to conceal the international diploma mill frauds allegation. See Feb. 2015, summary narrative to the Calif. Department of Justice (attached).
1.The complainant’s name, student I.D. number, mailing address and telephone number.
Jacob T. Wallace, SID 004483751, 10 / King Salamon Al Khobar, Eastern Province Saudi Arabia 9660545820567
2.The term and year of the complainant's last active academic status or the term and year the complainant sought admission to the university.
Spring 2012
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 3
August 2, 2016
3.A detailed description of the specific actions that constituted the alleged violation of one or more state laws, including the specific law or laws alleged to have been violated and, if known, the name(s) and title(s) of the responsible CSU employee(s).
●July 5, 2016, former state CSUSB employee sent out an email on the campus listserv and made admissions of a diploma mill, academic and financial fraud with unidentified Chinese agents and the CSUSB office of the president. See EO 1140 aka 1104.
●Chinese students submitted fraudulent transcripts solicited by CSUSB, which is a pattern of WASC accreditation violations and state law violations.
●Chinese students are taking 33 units per quarter or semester, which is ludicrous.
●Chinese agents & public officials operate CSUSB outside of the control, laws and standards of the CSU, WASC accreditation, state and federal laws for personal financial gain, prestige, and international travel.
●“Sold” units and degrees for cash, Chinese agents & CSUSB officials collected the illegal receipts of cash, internationally wired the monies, expended the money and profited from the fraud.
●CSUSB state officials knowingly issued international US education visas to coconspirators after illicitly creating a fraudulent admissions and diploma mill scheme outside and inside of the US.
●South Korean, Vietnamese, Chinese nationals entered or will enter the US territories on false and misleading visa applications to participate in the academic fraud after paying cash to Chinese agents and state public officials operating the diploma mills. Korean students on campus now, Chinese students arriving in the Fall.
●The chancellor’s office overseeing the state police on the San Bernardino campus mishandled a criminal complaint duly filed on July 23, 2016. That criminal complaint was flipped into a whistleblower complaint by the office of the chancellor, who then rejected their own complaint manipulation mechanism.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 4
August 2, 2016
●Projected violations of State and Federal Statute
* 18 U.S.C. §§ 1346 §§1341, 1343, Honest Services Fraud
*18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 Wire Fraud
*42 CFR 455.2 Internet & Device Fraud
*18 of Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a)
* RICO criminal statute (18 U .S.C.A.§ 1963) in a scheme to illegally generate income for themselves and others through a pattern of extortion, favoritism, improper influence, personal selfenrichment, selfdealing, concealment and conflict of interest
*Criminal Enterprise Act (21 U.S.C. §848)
*Cal Gov Code § 82048
(a) "Public official" means every member, officer, employee or consultant of a state or local government agency.
*Cal. Gov Code §§ 87100, 87103 Conflict of interest
*Cal. Gov. Code §1090 Self dealing (contractual conflict of interest)
*Cal. Gov. Code §8314; Use of public resources for private or political purposes
*Cal. Pen Code §424 Misappropriation of public funds
*The Public Record Act: Cal. Gov. Code §§625070; Cal Gov. Code §§3409034090.8 Failure to retain public Records and/or failure to allow public access to public records
*Common law and constitutional notions of due process
Failure to treat all members of the public in a fair and unbiased manner *18 U.S. Code § 641 Public money, property or records
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 5
August 2, 2016
4. The date(s) the alleged improper activities occurred or the condition developed.
The MA TESOL program since its inception in 2009, was solely designed and marketed for South Korean students by Lynn Diaz Ricco. 2009 to this date, state officials operate this diploma mill through a backdoor admissions fraud which includes an in house English assessment system used in the candidates home unmonitored, as opposed to internationally recognized assessments like IELTS.
State officials willfully accepted foreign MA candidates who had a baccalaureate from Korean taken in the Korean language. Korean candidates were then expected to perform highly rigorous master's level academic English work, when state officials knew they were incapable of said work because those officials had established a backdoor admissions process that was fraudulent and violates their WASC accreditation. In the left hand, state officials were advising students about plagiarism and academic dishonesty, and with the right hand, the same officials were subverting those standards through their fraud scheme. Turnitin, plagiarism software was disabled. These CSUSB public officials then created a watered down curriculum and set the stage for academic dishonesty and plagiarism. The Vietnamese MBA program operates the same. (see Feb. 22, 2014; Academic Formal Grievances attached. Note that there is also a non academic formal grievance, both were never processed and investigated even though the CSU chancellor’s office noticed San Bernardino officials (March 2014) of their obligations to act.
MA TESOL professor’s ignored several emails that outlined student academic misconduct that would be actionable under the college's plagiarism and academic honesty policies. An informal complaint was mishandled by Sandra Vasquez and Tainta Karmanova (Jan. 2015). Korean students should have been subjected to investigation, suspension and a suspension hearing. Instead, these public officials attacked US citizens and created a diversionary scheme to protect the illegal admissions scheme and the retention of the cash paying Koreans at the expense of the American students, who academically covered for the Koreans. The American’s education was swindled through the majority of Korean students that did not have an academic command of English. In a wrenching twist, the masters program instructed us that ESL students need at least five years of secondary academic English study to meet an ‘academic proficiency status’. CSUSB has awarded master's level education degrees to countless Koreans and other international students who are not at the masters level. Thereby, ruining the authenticity and stated standards of the degrees held by US citizens.
The Board of Trustees is responsible for the oversight of the California State University. The Board adopts rules, regulations, and policies governing the California State University. The Board has authority over curricular development, use of property, development of facilities, and fiscal and human resources management.
The Donahoe Act - which grew out of the recommendations of A Master Plan for Higher Education in California, 1960-1975 - became Division 16.5 of the California Education Code. Along with Division 18, it defines the composition, appointments, terms, powers, and functions of the Board of Trustees.
Section 89030 of the Code provides that "the Trustees shall adopt rules and regulations not inconsistent with the laws of this State for: a) the government of the trustees, b) the government of their appointees and employees, c) the government of the California State University." Section 66607 stipulates that "The California State University shall be entirely independent of all political and sectarian influence and kept free therefrom in the appointment of its trustees and in the administration of its affairs."
CSU students & faculty: don’t bother attempting to report to the Board of Trustees (BOT) they are too busy overseeing the vast CSU system to hear and respond to CSU students. For over three years calls, emails, and formal notices have been ignored by the BOT. All board members are also unavailable to locate in their public or private positions directly. It’s an insulated group, which is untethered from it's legislative leash.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 1
August 2, 2016
Jake \
10 / King Salamon
Al Khobar, Eastern Province Saudi Arabia
Monday, 02 August, 2016
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Board of Trustees
Office of the Chancellor
401 Golden Shore
Long Beach, California 908024210
RE: Executive Order 1063: ALLEGATIONS: Minimum of Three International Diploma Mills, Obstruction of Justice, Witness Tampering. Failure to Report Fiscal Improprieties, Collusion, Fraudulent International Student Visas, State Records Tampering, WASC Senior Collusion & Fraud, Fraudulent CSUSB Re Accreditation, Violations of Executive Orders and Formal Grievance Procedures, Misusing Campus Police Resources & Personnel, Concealing Fraud Allegations since Dec. 2013, Misuse of State Resources, “Selling” CSU to Foreign Nationals.
EO 1063:
This executive order fulfills the requirements of the Higher Education Act Title IV, 34 Code of Federal Regulations sections 600.9(a)(1)(i)(A) and 668.43(b), by establishing a complaint procedure for CSU students and student applicants alleging that the CSU has violated one or more state laws, where there is no other applicable CSU complaint procedure.
This is an Executive Order No. 1063, complaint alleging that the California State University, Cal State San Bernardino and Western Association of Senior College Accreditation (WASC) violated state laws from 2013 to 2016. That CSU officials through numerous state law violations have operated and concealed at least three international diploma mills. This student, Robert Green and at least one state employee have made multiple reports of the academic fraud to state officials, state law enforcement, WASC Senior, the Council for Higher Education (CHEA), CSUSB Faculty Senate, and CSU Board of Trustees.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 2
August 2, 2016
1)July 6, 2016, via a widespread CSUSB campus listser, a retired state employee made detailed admissions of a Chinese diploma mill.
2)A fraud criminal complaint was issued (July 23, 2016) to the CSUSB campus Chief Jamsen and other law enforcement. A Chancellor’s office public official, Linda Hanson, flipped that criminal complaint into a whistleblower complaint that CSU then rejected. This fits an established pattern from January 2013, of CSU officials acting poorly and violating executive orders, reporting requirements and subverting their roles as public officials, while the diploma mills unabashedly operate.
3)Just discovered that CSU & CSUSB officials as public officials created a diversion of willful obstruction, state records tampering and manufactured facts from Dec. 2013, to the current date. The purpose of the diversion was to conceal the fraud allegations and attack the complainant. This ongoing diversionary and subversion scheme has actively operated from 2013, to the current date. At some point, the chancellor’s office became complicit. These public officials actions waive EO 1063, 30day reporting requirements under federal law, as all acts to date are a continuation of prior acts to conceal the international diploma mill frauds allegation. See Feb. 2015, summary narrative to the Calif. Department of Justice (attached).
1.The complainant’s name, student I.D. number, mailing address and telephone number.
Jacob T. Wallace, SID 004483751, 10 / King Salamon Al Khobar, Eastern Province Saudi Arabia 9660545820567
2.The term and year of the complainant's last active academic status or the term and year the complainant sought admission to the university.
Spring 2012
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 3
August 2, 2016
3.A detailed description of the specific actions that constituted the alleged violation of one or more state laws, including the specific law or laws alleged to have been violated and, if known, the name(s) and title(s) of the responsible CSU employee(s).
●July 5, 2016, former state CSUSB employee sent out an email on the campus listserv and made admissions of a diploma mill, academic and financial fraud with unidentified Chinese agents and the CSUSB office of the president. See EO 1140 aka 1104.
●Chinese students submitted fraudulent transcripts solicited by CSUSB, which is a pattern of WASC accreditation violations and state law violations.
●Chinese students are taking 33 units per quarter or semester, which is ludicrous.
●Chinese agents & public officials operate CSUSB outside of the control, laws and standards of the CSU, WASC accreditation, state and federal laws for personal financial gain, prestige, and international travel.
●“Sold” units and degrees for cash, Chinese agents & CSUSB officials collected the illegal receipts of cash, internationally wired the monies, expended the money and profited from the fraud.
●CSUSB state officials knowingly issued international US education visas to coconspirators after illicitly creating a fraudulent admissions and diploma mill scheme outside and inside of the US.
●South Korean, Vietnamese, Chinese nationals entered or will enter the US territories on false and misleading visa applications to participate in the academic fraud after paying cash to Chinese agents and state public officials operating the diploma mills. Korean students on campus now, Chinese students arriving in the Fall.
●The chancellor’s office overseeing the state police on the San Bernardino campus mishandled a criminal complaint duly filed on July 23, 2016. That criminal complaint was flipped into a whistleblower complaint by the office of the chancellor, who then rejected their own complaint manipulation mechanism.
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 4
August 2, 2016
●Projected violations of State and Federal Statute
* 18 U.S.C. §§ 1346 §§1341, 1343, Honest Services Fraud
*18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 Wire Fraud
*42 CFR 455.2 Internet & Device Fraud
*18 of Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a)
* RICO criminal statute (18 U .S.C.A.§ 1963) in a scheme to illegally generate income for themselves and others through a pattern of extortion, favoritism, improper influence, personal selfenrichment, selfdealing, concealment and conflict of interest
*Criminal Enterprise Act (21 U.S.C. §848)
*Cal Gov Code § 82048
(a) "Public official" means every member, officer, employee or consultant of a state or local government agency.
*Cal. Gov Code §§ 87100, 87103 Conflict of interest
*Cal. Gov. Code §1090 Self dealing (contractual conflict of interest)
*Cal. Gov. Code §8314; Use of public resources for private or political purposes
*Cal. Pen Code §424 Misappropriation of public funds
*The Public Record Act: Cal. Gov. Code §§625070; Cal Gov. Code §§3409034090.8 Failure to retain public Records and/or failure to allow public access to public records
*Common law and constitutional notions of due process
Failure to treat all members of the public in a fair and unbiased manner *18 U.S. Code § 641 Public money, property or records
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 5
August 2, 2016
4. The date(s) the alleged improper activities occurred or the condition developed.
The MA TESOL program since its inception in 2009, was solely designed and marketed for South Korean students by Lynn Diaz Ricco. 2009 to this date, state officials operate this diploma mill through a backdoor admissions fraud which includes an in house English assessment system used in the candidates home unmonitored, as opposed to internationally recognized assessments like IELTS.
State officials willfully accepted foreign MA candidates who had a baccalaureate from Korean taken in the Korean language. Korean candidates were then expected to perform highly rigorous master's level academic English work, when state officials knew they were incapable of said work because those officials had established a backdoor admissions process that was fraudulent and violates their WASC accreditation. In the left hand, state officials were advising students about plagiarism and academic dishonesty, and with the right hand, the same officials were subverting those standards through their fraud scheme. Turnitin, plagiarism software was disabled. These CSUSB public officials then created a watered down curriculum and set the stage for academic dishonesty and plagiarism. The Vietnamese MBA program operates the same. (see Feb. 22, 2014; Academic Formal Grievances attached. Note that there is also a non academic formal grievance, both were never processed and investigated even though the CSU chancellor’s office noticed San Bernardino officials (March 2014) of their obligations to act.
MA TESOL professor’s ignored several emails that outlined student academic misconduct that would be actionable under the college's plagiarism and academic honesty policies. An informal complaint was mishandled by Sandra Vasquez and Tainta Karmanova (Jan. 2015). Korean students should have been subjected to investigation, suspension and a suspension hearing. Instead, these public officials attacked US citizens and created a diversionary scheme to protect the illegal admissions scheme and the retention of the cash paying Koreans at the expense of the American students, who academically covered for the Koreans. The American’s education was swindled through the majority of Korean students that did not have an academic command of English. In a wrenching twist, the masters program instructed us that ESL students need at least five years of secondary academic English study to meet an ‘academic proficiency status’. CSUSB has awarded master's level education degrees to countless Koreans and other international students who are not at the masters level. Thereby, ruining the authenticity and stated standards of the degrees held by US citizens.
Regards,
Jake
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 6
August 2, 2016
5.A list of witnesses, if any, including their contact information and the facts known by each.
a)Student witnesses cited in the Feb. 22, 2014, uninvestigated two formal grievances.
b)State employee identified in the July 5, 2016, email listserv
c)All US born students in the program from 2009 to current.
d)State employees that were harassed and forced to participate in the fraud. DHR, Cesar Portillo and Douglas Freer.
6.Copies of any documentary evidence that supports the complaint. Descriptions of documents that support the complaint and, if known, where the documents are maintained and by whom if the actual documents are not in the possession of the complainant.
a)DOJ investigation and the 800 pages reviewed.
b)DOJ Feb 2015, narrative.
c)All emails and executive orders, grievances and communication from Dec. 2013 to current to CSUSB and CSU.
d)All emails, complaints with WASC and the WASC file.
e)All WASC agenda and board meetings from 2013 to current.
f)CSUSB campus criminal reporting and investigations from 2013 to current.
g)Four CSU presidents sit as WASC commissioners and act as the employer of WASC personnel that ‘independently’ regulate and accredit CSU. Vet these public officials conduct as WASC commissioners.
h)All letters generated by the office of the chancellor.
i)All letters generated from the office of the president CSUSB.
j)Access the foreign agents in China, Korea and Vietnam.
k)EO 1140 (1104) Fiscal Improprieties
l)CSU Sept 17, 2015 (complaint letter)
m)Feb. 22, 2014, formal academic grievance
n)WASC FOIA request.
o)Chancellor’s feedback, review and praise of the CSUSB president in late 2015, after the Korean fraud was concealed.
7.Signed under penalty of perjury, Tuesday, the Second Day of August, Two Thousand and Sixteen; the Day of our Lord.
______________________________________________________
Jake Wallace
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 7
August 2, 2016
Conspirators and Co Conspirators:
CSUSB Campus
Tomas Morales
Bryan Haynes
Sandra Vasquez
Andrew Bodman
Jim Brown (ret) Milton Clark Tainta Karmanova Jack Pauduntin Ron Chen
Alysson Satterlund Lynn Diaz Ricco
Unidentified South Korean, Vietnamese, Chinese students from 2009, onwards.
California State University: Office of the Chancellor
Timothy White
Linda Hanson
Mark Crase
Cynthia Conway
Virjee Framroze
Lori Lamb
California State University Concurrently Actings as WASC Senior College and University Accreditation, Commissioners
Jeffrey Armstrong, President, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Janna Bersi, Professor, California State University, Dominguez Hills William Covino, President of California State University, Los Angeles Mildred García, president of California State University, Fullerton Dianne F. Harrison, president of California State University, Northridge
Executive Order No. 1063: Intent to File a Complaint over State (Federal) Law Violations. 8
August 2, 2016
California State University is accredited by the Senior College Commission of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC). WASC is an institutional accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. This federallyrecognized body provides assurance to students, parents and all stakeholders that CSU meets clear quality standards for educational and financial performance
Pursuant to the United States Department of Education's Program Integrity Rule, each institution of higher education is required to provide all prospective and current students with the contact information for the state agency or agencies that handle complaints against postsecondary education institutions offering distance learning within that state.
●CSUSB failed to meet this requirement. Additional allegation.
We Californian's love our state, there's no better perptartor of misconduct than our public officlas. Here we have CSUSB including state residents in a diploma mill scheme and awarding/recieving federal student loans dollars fraudlently.
Re: Allegations of a Korean & Chinese Diploma Mill on the California State University, San Bernardino campus, satellite classrooms in China and online.
I am unable to report through the following link: https://feedback.studentaid.ed.gov/Feedback, due to either a connectivity problem or website issue.
Western Association of Schools & Colleges, (WASC Senior) the accrediting and investigative agency for CSUSB has failed to conduct an appropriate investigation of the Korean scheme. Three California State University campus presidents sit as WASB board members. A Chinese diploma mill was was reported in July 2016, a CSUSB WASC liaison was accused of operating that scheme with WASC’ knowledge. Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) has been non responsive and acts as a federally recognized governing body over WASC.
I am reporting that the Master's program I am currently enrolled in has substantial plagiarism and academic dishonesty taking place. 70% of the student body are Koreans, some made admissions of a backdoor admission policy. They also had limited English command at the master's level and did not take international standards level exams for admittance into such a program. CSUSB officials mishandled several formal complaint processes, as did their accreditation institution, WASC Senior, and the CSU chancellor's office. I was blocked from access to the CSU Board of Trustees.
I was suspended for nine months after I reported and pursued the allegations. CSUSB manufactured misconduct allegations that were never formally and honestly handled. I should have completed in early 2015. CUSB altered state records with witness intimidation in a series of acts to never investigate and conceal the allegations. In July 2016, a 29-year employee made admissions of another diploma mill involving Chinese students that the employee attempted to end. There are numerous documents and communications outlining these issues.
I allege that the CSUSB’s formal request for FSA was fraudulent as CSUSB either knew or should have known of the Korean MA TESOL diploma scheme. That CSUSB has utilized public resources, time and their positions as public officials to not investigate the diploma mill accusations. In addition, international student visas would have been falsely issued through CSUSB. I allege that I also fraudulently received FSA as an unwitting actor in CSUSB’s financial and academic plan to bootstrap their independently funded, College of Extended Learning, through these diploma mills.
I am requesting a formal investigation conducted by the Office of Inspector General, and not by WASC or CHEA. Email is the best way to communicate with me.
We Californian's love our state, there's no better perptartor of misconduct than our public officlas. Here we have CSUSB including state residents in a diploma mill scheme and awarding/recieving federal student loans dollars fraudlently.
Re: Allegations of a Korean & Chinese Diploma Mill on the California State University, San Bernardino campus, satellite classrooms in China and online.
I am unable to report through the following link: https://feedback.studentaid.ed.gov/Feedback, due to either a connectivity problem or website issue.
Western Association of Schools & Colleges, (WASC Senior) the accrediting and investigative agency for CSUSB has failed to conduct an appropriate investigation of the Korean scheme. Three California State University campus presidents sit as WASB board members. A Chinese diploma mill was was reported in July 2016, a CSUSB WASC liaison was accused of operating that scheme with WASC’ knowledge. Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) has been non responsive and acts as a federally recognized governing body over WASC.
I am reporting that the Master's program I am currently enrolled in has substantial plagiarism and academic dishonesty taking place. 70% of the student body are Koreans, some made admissions of a backdoor admission policy. They also had limited English command at the master's level and did not take international standards level exams for admittance into such a program. CSUSB officials mishandled several formal complaint processes, as did their accreditation institution, WASC Senior, and the CSU chancellor's office. I was blocked from access to the CSU Board of Trustees.
I was suspended for nine months after I reported and pursued the allegations. CSUSB manufactured misconduct allegations that were never formally and honestly handled. I should have completed in early 2015. CUSB altered state records with witness intimidation in a series of acts to never investigate and conceal the allegations. In July 2016, a 29-year employee made admissions of another diploma mill involving Chinese students that the employee attempted to end. There are numerous documents and communications outlining these issues.
I allege that the CSUSB’s formal request for FSA was fraudulent as CSUSB either knew or should have known of the Korean MA TESOL diploma scheme. That CSUSB has utilized public resources, time and their positions as public officials to not investigate the diploma mill accusations. In addition, international student visas would have been falsely issued through CSUSB. I allege that I also fraudulently received FSA as an unwitting actor in CSUSB’s financial and academic plan to bootstrap their independently funded, College of Extended Learning, through these diploma mills.
I am requesting a formal investigation conducted by the Office of Inspector General, and not by WASC or CHEA. Email is the best way to communicate with me.