Bob hurt mortgage attack scam artist not consumer advocate trys to extort cfla for $7,777.00 or he will write disparaging articles about cfla Actual emails inside)
Cfla.com | july 26, 2019
Mortgage attack ~ bob hurt does not save consumers ~ he extorts executives ~ by writing false and defamatory articles about cfla, the nation’s leading experts in foreclosure defense, in exchange for cash $$$$$$$ extortion..
See below correspondence copied from emails exchanged between cfla ceo andrew lehman and self proclaimed consumer advocate bob hurt wherein bob hurt offers to remove his disparaging articles about cfla for a payment in the amount of $7,777.00
Do not trust bob hurt the fake consumer advocate, he belongs in jail as his extortionary tactics will surely be dealt with soon. By his own admission it is clear what bob hurt mortgage attack - http://mortgageattack.com
Bob hurt, the only way to beat the banks!!!
See true and correct copies of bob hurts extortionary emails below:
If you agree to that, i have a business suggestion for you that you might like.
Bob hurt
On 5/16/19 11:07 pm, cfla admin wrote:
I will pay you $5,000.00 to read and understand the cfla information above sufficient to give you a full understand of the falsity of that information you published, and thereafter you will take down all of the articles that you wrote about cfla that are replete with false malicious and untruthful information categorizing cfla as a scam, whereupon cfla will provide you free sponsored advertising on our site, promote your blog materials on our site and social media, and we wont file a preliminary injunction and complaint for damages for trade liber slander and other torts in the southern district of texas with my staff attorneys who otherwise have nothing better to do, serve you with request for disclosures, and multiple sets of discovery, including depositions, and take a judgment against you for statutory damages, actual damages, attorneys fees and costs...
How much will you pay me to read and analyze the below self-promoting marketing material for cfla?
On 2019-05-16 02:22, cfla admin wrote:
Background on cfla operations
Cfla operated, and maintains operation as a business-to-business provider of securitization audits and litigation support services directly to attorneys and mortgage professionals in the usa and other countries such as ireland, the uk, south africa, and australia all of which having similar banking systems. As a business-to-business provider of these auditing services much of the changes and/or direction of the work product over the years were recommended at the suggestion of the attorney client. Cfla has produced documentation to the cfpb demonstrating more than 500 licensed attorneys and/or law firms that have been clients of cfla since 2010.
Cfla has been at the forefront for cutting edge innovation in the industry, as well as on the compliance side for the entire industry of forensic loan auditing and bloomberg securitization audits, while providing training state bar approved continuing education courses to licensed attorneys in california, texas, nevada, hawaii, illinois, new york, florida, and other states, mr. Lehman has overseen the training of more than 1,000 licensed attorneys and 5,000 cumulative trainees nationwide through his 24 hour training classes, 6 hour cle seminars, and hosted more than 250 events hosted nationwide since 2010. Furthermore, cfla has sold more than 10,000 of mr. Lehman’s dvds since 2009.
In or about 2009, cfla began what is currently known as the mortgage securitization analyst training class, which requires 3 full days of training 24 hours, as well as notarized and graded examinations, and strict adherence to the ethical requirements of a cfla auditor. Initially the class was taught by andrew lehman, j.D., and brendan mcdonald, and michael t. Pines, and then time or’eiley and art bernardo until mr. Carrigan began teaching the class in or about 2013 alongside california attorney tim o’reiley. In these classes cfla distributes and requires consent to the.
[i] A) mars consumer guide for businesses, and requires express agreements under the
B) cfla code of ethics of a mortgage securitization analyst
[ii] to guide them in ethical responsibilities as a mortgage securitization analyst and mandate compliance under the state & federal laws.
Moreover, cfla has issued press releases to its clients, trainees, requiring strict adherence to the mars rule and regulation o, even having to terminate several of its wholesale clients, and even a few employees, for not having strictly complied with the mars rule, regulation o, and other requirements as a matter of law.
It is cfla’s hard stance in an otherwise unregulated industry that has made for a better and safer place for the consumers who demand the cutting edge work product presently known as the bloomberg property securitization audit. Cfla prides itself as being on the forefront for compliance with its customers, trainees, and followers since its inception in or about 2009. Since 2009, cfla has performed more than 10,000 residential forensic loan audits, trained more than 1,300 people in its nationally recognized auditor class.
Cfla offers attorneys full foreclosure audits and strategies. Our expertise are bloomberg securitization audits as well as complete turn-key quiet title litigation solutions for licensed attorneys to competently sue lenders for state & federal violations to either stop foreclosure, obtain legal damages, or both.
Cfla.com conducts attorney state bar approved continuing education training classes Cles) are taught by trained cfla industry experts. Our cles have been approved by the state bars of tx, ca, fl, nv, ny, ga, and hawaii with topics ranging from
(1) securitization audits in bankruptcy practice,
(2) securitization audits and foreclosure defense strategies,
(3) securitization audits in contract law & ucc,
(4) principal reductions through strategic litigation,
(5) mortgage securitization in litigation,
(6) quiet title litigation,
(7) unsecured debt transactions and the
(8) california homeowners bill of rights are among the subjects presented during our cle classes. Cfla keynote speakers include: charles christmas, esq., patricia rodriguez, esq; john fretz, esq; chad elrod, esq., jeff jackson, esq., anthony vigna, esq., andrew p. Lehman, j.D.; divina westerfield, esq.; regis sauger, timothy o’reilly, esq.; amar gupta, esq., oliver hull, esq., charles powell, esq., noberto reyes, esq., brendan mcdonald, esq., joseph huprich, esq., chris mcglaughlin, esq., eric hougen, esq., and others.
Certified forensic loan auditors also has created a nationally recognized analyst training certification course. Mortgage securitization and forensic loan auditing are presented during our professional 24-hr how-to class. There have been nearly 1,500 executive level professionals who have graduated from this program since 2009 in each of the following states: ca, nv, il, ny, nj, wa, dc, md, ga, and fl as well as online courses
Ii. Cfla consumer related information
In or about december 2018, cfla, sent a freedom of information act request to the cfpb requesting copies of any and all complaints submitted to the ftc or ffpb referencing “cfla” or regarding “cfla” at any time since 2010.[iii] the results of this foiar yielding great information about the nature of the complaints from consumers concerning cfla. Interesting to learn that the ftc and the cfpb had received 42 complaints regarding cfla, however, only 3 of these complaints had cfla named as the party/entity that the complaint was against One in 2010, 2016, and 2018). In fact, the far standing majority of these complaints were as against banks / servicers, or other banking institutions with cfla being represented in the complaint as assisting in the complaint process. Of the 3 complaints listed in the entire cfpb database regarding cfla, 2 of them had already been refunded in their entirety, and only one consumer, a resident of the north pole alaska’s complaint still remained unresolved due to his difficulty traveling by sled to the cfla attorney referral in anchorage, ak.
Only 1 such consumer complaint existed since 2010 claiming “fraud” which is the consumer from north pole, ak. To give a fair ratio, cfla produced more than 15,000 client files that it had completed for customers of cfla since 2007. 3 of the consumer complaints against cfla occurred during this time period referenced in the cid E.G. 2014 – current). So given the 15,000 client files produced by cfla during the period cfla had a complaint ration of 1 in 5,000 customer which equates to a .000004%.
I. Cfla sells bloomberg securitization property analysis reports
As business to business providers of these auditing services cfla provides the bloomberg securitization audit report with a court ready expert witness affidavit from our senior auditor & leading expert, michael carrigan, in addition to
(1) time stamped bloomberg screenshots showing all the financial data of the trust including paid off, insurance, remics, loan forgiveness, loan mod info, re capitalization, etc,
(2) copy of the pooling & servicing agreement on the respective loan,
(3) full fraud & robo signing analysis,
(4) credit default swap analysis,
(5) full chain of title analysis of assignments & transfers looking for
A) defunct entity status,
B) improper dates,
C) improper signatures & endorsements,
D) fraud,
E) robosigning,
(6) court ready expert witness affidavit under oath by michael carrigan attesting to the facts derived in the audit report.
Each cfla client executes an agreement that states the following, in pertinent part: A) cfla is not a law firm and we do not provide legal advice, B) cfla does not provide foreclosure consulting services, C) cfla does not offer or assist with any form of loan modification, D) cfla is a professional auditing company and document support provider, € we do not transact on behalf of the homeowner in any way, including sending letters, making phone calls, contacting banks, or filing and serving your legal documents. Cfla offers the sale of goods, and not services, F) cfla always recommends that homeowners use these cutting edge services in conjunction with the representation of a licensed attorney in their respective jurisdiction, G) that the use of the cfla legal forms is not the substitute for the actual advice of an attorney, H) finally that all work generated on behalf of cfla for client shall be under the direct supervision of an attorney licensed in their appropriate jurisdiction [iv]
Ii. Cfla has an excellent reputation in the trade with consumers, consumer reporting agencies, consumer trade sites, and otherwise
Cfla has been registered with the better business bureau and has maintained an a+ rating on its business since january of 2010. Cfla has had very few complaints and those complaints were responded to quickly, and resolved by cfla. Cfla has been cited by the bbb as (1) having very few complaints, (2) transparent business practices, and (3) no known advertising issues. [v]
Cfla also maintains an aaa rating with the business consumer alliance as having responded
(1) responded to consumer complaints promptly,
(2) resolving consumer complaints directly with clients fairly, and
(3) making appropriate representations online regarding the company.
[vii] furthermore, as evidence by the foia request produced by the bureau, cfla does not facilitate very many consumer complaints having had only 3 consumer complaints in the 10 years of business reported to the cfpb and the ftc.
In determining whether an act or practice is unfair, the bureau may consider established public policies as evidence to be considered with all other evidence. 12 usc 5531 (2).
Clfa never engages in any contact with consumer’s servicer as such would violate state law, and cfla does not provide services directly to the consumer without representation See cfla customer agreement). Furthermore,
(1) cfla does not practice law and
(2) cfla does not perform any type of loan modification.
The reason that cfla does not negotiate directly with the consumers dwelling or servicer is to avoid violating state law statutes restricting the unlawful practice of law. This was the major consideration when cfla formed it business back in 2007. Cfla wanted to avoid breaking laws and as a result it required all of its clients to have representation, evinced by the customers executing a service agreement which stated cfla’s client agreement states in bold inconspicuous form as follows “client agrees and hereby covenants that all work generated on his behalf, or on behalf of his company, that is generated by cfla or its members will be under the supervision of his/her attorney, licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction, the bold statements are intended to ensure that the client know up front that cfla is not performing a mortgage foreclosure relief service on their behalf.
Each cfla client executes an agreement that states the following, in pertinent part:
A) cfla is not a law firm and we do not provide legal advice,
B) cfla does not provide foreclosure consulting services,
C) cfla does not offer or assist with any form of loan modification,
D) cfla is a professional auditing company and document support provider,
E) we do not transact on behalf of the homeowner in any way, including sending letters, making phone calls, contacting banks, or filing and serving your legal documents. Cfla offers the sale of goods, and not services,
F) cfla always recommends that homeowners use these cutting edge services in conjunction with the representation of a licensed attorney in their respective jurisdiction,
[viii] the intent of the founders was for this policy to stay in place because it would prevent cfla customer service from engaging in the unlawful practice of law under state laws.
BOB HURT STORM BRADFORM MORTGAGE ATTACK Reviews
Bob hurt mortgage attack scam artist not consumer advocate trys to extort cfla for $7,777.00 or he will write disparaging articles about cfla Actual emails inside)
Cfla.com | july 26, 2019
Mortgage attack ~ bob hurt does not save consumers ~ he extorts executives ~ by writing false and defamatory articles about cfla, the nation’s leading experts in foreclosure defense, in exchange for cash $$$$$$$ extortion..
See below correspondence copied from emails exchanged between cfla ceo andrew lehman and self proclaimed consumer advocate bob hurt wherein bob hurt offers to remove his disparaging articles about cfla for a payment in the amount of $7,777.00
Do not trust bob hurt the fake consumer advocate, he belongs in jail as his extortionary tactics will surely be dealt with soon. By his own admission it is clear what bob hurt mortgage attack - http://mortgageattack.com
Bob hurt, the only way to beat the banks!!!
See true and correct copies of bob hurts extortionary emails below:
---------- forwarded message ---------
From: bob hurt <[email protected]>
Date: tue, may 21, 2019 at 3:06 pm
Subject: re: cfla preliminary response to trade libel
To: cfla admin <[email protected]>
Make it $7,777 and you have a deal.
If you agree to that, i have a business suggestion for you that you might like.
Bob hurt
On 5/16/19 11:07 pm, cfla admin wrote:
I will pay you $5,000.00 to read and understand the cfla information above sufficient to give you a full understand of the falsity of that information you published, and thereafter you will take down all of the articles that you wrote about cfla that are replete with false malicious and untruthful information categorizing cfla as a scam, whereupon cfla will provide you free sponsored advertising on our site, promote your blog materials on our site and social media, and we wont file a preliminary injunction and complaint for damages for trade liber slander and other torts in the southern district of texas with my staff attorneys who otherwise have nothing better to do, serve you with request for disclosures, and multiple sets of discovery, including depositions, and take a judgment against you for statutory damages, actual damages, attorneys fees and costs...
Is that an agreement?
On thu, may 16, 2019 at 8:52 pm bob hurt <[email protected]> wrote:
How much will you pay me to read and analyze the below self-promoting marketing material for cfla?
On 2019-05-16 02:22, cfla admin wrote:
Background on cfla operations
Cfla operated, and maintains operation as a business-to-business provider of securitization audits and litigation support services directly to attorneys and mortgage professionals in the usa and other countries such as ireland, the uk, south africa, and australia all of which having similar banking systems. As a business-to-business provider of these auditing services much of the changes and/or direction of the work product over the years were recommended at the suggestion of the attorney client. Cfla has produced documentation to the cfpb demonstrating more than 500 licensed attorneys and/or law firms that have been clients of cfla since 2010.
Cfla has been at the forefront for cutting edge innovation in the industry, as well as on the compliance side for the entire industry of forensic loan auditing and bloomberg securitization audits, while providing training state bar approved continuing education courses to licensed attorneys in california, texas, nevada, hawaii, illinois, new york, florida, and other states, mr. Lehman has overseen the training of more than 1,000 licensed attorneys and 5,000 cumulative trainees nationwide through his 24 hour training classes, 6 hour cle seminars, and hosted more than 250 events hosted nationwide since 2010. Furthermore, cfla has sold more than 10,000 of mr. Lehman’s dvds since 2009.
In or about 2009, cfla began what is currently known as the mortgage securitization analyst training class, which requires 3 full days of training 24 hours, as well as notarized and graded examinations, and strict adherence to the ethical requirements of a cfla auditor. Initially the class was taught by andrew lehman, j.D., and brendan mcdonald, and michael t. Pines, and then time or’eiley and art bernardo until mr. Carrigan began teaching the class in or about 2013 alongside california attorney tim o’reiley. In these classes cfla distributes and requires consent to the.
[i] A) mars consumer guide for businesses, and requires express agreements under the
B) cfla code of ethics of a mortgage securitization analyst
[ii] to guide them in ethical responsibilities as a mortgage securitization analyst and mandate compliance under the state & federal laws.
Moreover, cfla has issued press releases to its clients, trainees, requiring strict adherence to the mars rule and regulation o, even having to terminate several of its wholesale clients, and even a few employees, for not having strictly complied with the mars rule, regulation o, and other requirements as a matter of law.
It is cfla’s hard stance in an otherwise unregulated industry that has made for a better and safer place for the consumers who demand the cutting edge work product presently known as the bloomberg property securitization audit. Cfla prides itself as being on the forefront for compliance with its customers, trainees, and followers since its inception in or about 2009. Since 2009, cfla has performed more than 10,000 residential forensic loan audits, trained more than 1,300 people in its nationally recognized auditor class.
Cfla offers attorneys full foreclosure audits and strategies. Our expertise are bloomberg securitization audits as well as complete turn-key quiet title litigation solutions for licensed attorneys to competently sue lenders for state & federal violations to either stop foreclosure, obtain legal damages, or both.
Cfla.com conducts attorney state bar approved continuing education training classes Cles) are taught by trained cfla industry experts. Our cles have been approved by the state bars of tx, ca, fl, nv, ny, ga, and hawaii with topics ranging from
(1) securitization audits in bankruptcy practice,
(2) securitization audits and foreclosure defense strategies,
(3) securitization audits in contract law & ucc,
(4) principal reductions through strategic litigation,
(5) mortgage securitization in litigation,
(6) quiet title litigation,
(7) unsecured debt transactions and the
(8) california homeowners bill of rights are among the subjects presented during our cle classes. Cfla keynote speakers include: charles christmas, esq., patricia rodriguez, esq; john fretz, esq; chad elrod, esq., jeff jackson, esq., anthony vigna, esq., andrew p. Lehman, j.D.; divina westerfield, esq.; regis sauger, timothy o’reilly, esq.; amar gupta, esq., oliver hull, esq., charles powell, esq., noberto reyes, esq., brendan mcdonald, esq., joseph huprich, esq., chris mcglaughlin, esq., eric hougen, esq., and others.
Certified forensic loan auditors also has created a nationally recognized analyst training certification course. Mortgage securitization and forensic loan auditing are presented during our professional 24-hr how-to class. There have been nearly 1,500 executive level professionals who have graduated from this program since 2009 in each of the following states: ca, nv, il, ny, nj, wa, dc, md, ga, and fl as well as online courses
Ii. Cfla consumer related information
In or about december 2018, cfla, sent a freedom of information act request to the cfpb requesting copies of any and all complaints submitted to the ftc or ffpb referencing “cfla” or regarding “cfla” at any time since 2010.[iii] the results of this foiar yielding great information about the nature of the complaints from consumers concerning cfla. Interesting to learn that the ftc and the cfpb had received 42 complaints regarding cfla, however, only 3 of these complaints had cfla named as the party/entity that the complaint was against One in 2010, 2016, and 2018). In fact, the far standing majority of these complaints were as against banks / servicers, or other banking institutions with cfla being represented in the complaint as assisting in the complaint process. Of the 3 complaints listed in the entire cfpb database regarding cfla, 2 of them had already been refunded in their entirety, and only one consumer, a resident of the north pole alaska’s complaint still remained unresolved due to his difficulty traveling by sled to the cfla attorney referral in anchorage, ak.
Only 1 such consumer complaint existed since 2010 claiming “fraud” which is the consumer from north pole, ak. To give a fair ratio, cfla produced more than 15,000 client files that it had completed for customers of cfla since 2007. 3 of the consumer complaints against cfla occurred during this time period referenced in the cid E.G. 2014 – current). So given the 15,000 client files produced by cfla during the period cfla had a complaint ration of 1 in 5,000 customer which equates to a .000004%.
I. Cfla sells bloomberg securitization property analysis reports
As business to business providers of these auditing services cfla provides the bloomberg securitization audit report with a court ready expert witness affidavit from our senior auditor & leading expert, michael carrigan, in addition to
(1) time stamped bloomberg screenshots showing all the financial data of the trust including paid off, insurance, remics, loan forgiveness, loan mod info, re capitalization, etc,
(2) copy of the pooling & servicing agreement on the respective loan,
(3) full fraud & robo signing analysis,
(4) credit default swap analysis,
(5) full chain of title analysis of assignments & transfers looking for
A) defunct entity status,
B) improper dates,
C) improper signatures & endorsements,
D) fraud,
E) robosigning,
(6) court ready expert witness affidavit under oath by michael carrigan attesting to the facts derived in the audit report.
Each cfla client executes an agreement that states the following, in pertinent part: A) cfla is not a law firm and we do not provide legal advice, B) cfla does not provide foreclosure consulting services, C) cfla does not offer or assist with any form of loan modification, D) cfla is a professional auditing company and document support provider, € we do not transact on behalf of the homeowner in any way, including sending letters, making phone calls, contacting banks, or filing and serving your legal documents. Cfla offers the sale of goods, and not services, F) cfla always recommends that homeowners use these cutting edge services in conjunction with the representation of a licensed attorney in their respective jurisdiction, G) that the use of the cfla legal forms is not the substitute for the actual advice of an attorney, H) finally that all work generated on behalf of cfla for client shall be under the direct supervision of an attorney licensed in their appropriate jurisdiction [iv]
Ii. Cfla has an excellent reputation in the trade with consumers, consumer reporting agencies, consumer trade sites, and otherwise
Cfla has been registered with the better business bureau and has maintained an a+ rating on its business since january of 2010. Cfla has had very few complaints and those complaints were responded to quickly, and resolved by cfla. Cfla has been cited by the bbb as (1) having very few complaints, (2) transparent business practices, and (3) no known advertising issues. [v]
Cfla also maintains an aaa rating with the business consumer alliance as having responded
(1) responded to consumer complaints promptly,
(2) resolving consumer complaints directly with clients fairly, and
(3) making appropriate representations online regarding the company.
[vii] furthermore, as evidence by the foia request produced by the bureau, cfla does not facilitate very many consumer complaints having had only 3 consumer complaints in the 10 years of business reported to the cfpb and the ftc.
In determining whether an act or practice is unfair, the bureau may consider established public policies as evidence to be considered with all other evidence. 12 usc 5531 (2).
Clfa never engages in any contact with consumer’s servicer as such would violate state law, and cfla does not provide services directly to the consumer without representation See cfla customer agreement). Furthermore,
(1) cfla does not practice law and
(2) cfla does not perform any type of loan modification.
The reason that cfla does not negotiate directly with the consumers dwelling or servicer is to avoid violating state law statutes restricting the unlawful practice of law. This was the major consideration when cfla formed it business back in 2007. Cfla wanted to avoid breaking laws and as a result it required all of its clients to have representation, evinced by the customers executing a service agreement which stated cfla’s client agreement states in bold inconspicuous form as follows “client agrees and hereby covenants that all work generated on his behalf, or on behalf of his company, that is generated by cfla or its members will be under the supervision of his/her attorney, licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction, the bold statements are intended to ensure that the client know up front that cfla is not performing a mortgage foreclosure relief service on their behalf.
Each cfla client executes an agreement that states the following, in pertinent part:
A) cfla is not a law firm and we do not provide legal advice,
B) cfla does not provide foreclosure consulting services,
C) cfla does not offer or assist with any form of loan modification,
D) cfla is a professional auditing company and document support provider,
E) we do not transact on behalf of the homeowner in any way, including sending letters, making phone calls, contacting banks, or filing and serving your legal documents. Cfla offers the sale of goods, and not services,
F) cfla always recommends that homeowners use these cutting edge services in conjunction with the representation of a licensed attorney in their respective jurisdiction,
[viii] the intent of the founders was for this policy to stay in place because it would prevent cfla customer service from engaging in the unlawful practice of law under state laws.
Order cutting-edge services now