Someone from and/or associated with Arlington Animal Services recently assisted Alison on 4703 Morris Heights Dr, Arlington, TX 76016 in burying possibly our missing/lost/deceased cat Tutu (microchip id 982000411850467) in her own backyard without first attempting to scan for microchip ID nor without proper incident cataloging and without following official disposal processes.
If the allegations are true the city of Arlington has been asked to compel Attorney Alison Paige Porterfield (Texas State Bar Card Number: 24071034 ) to consent to an excavation, leading to a scanning/identification and/or subsequently a proper burial and proper documentation/cataloging of the deceased cat in question, even if it turns out to not be our missing cat but especially if it turns out to be our cat as both Alison and Culver have attempted to infer/convey that to us.
If someone from Arlington Animal Services was indeed involved in this in some way or another, I hope Arlington will do the right thing and assist us in ascertaining the true identity of the deceased cat and up to and including bringing her home so that we can properly bury her if indeed it is our cat.
Our family (including my father) was recently notified by our direct/immediate nextdoor neighbor a house resident by the name of Mr. James Culver that his direct/immediate nextdoor neighbor an attorney Alison on had recently found a deceased grey cat which they also claim to fit the description of our missing cat Tutu ( tutumissing.com ).
Both James and Alison have stated to us that Alison found a dead cat in her backyard matching the description of our missing cat, but instead of notifying us right away, Alison decided to call her friend who happens to work for Animal Services and they dug a hole in her backyard and subsequently buried the dead cat without first performing a microchip scan nor without proper documentation nor cataloging of the incident.
When our cat went missing we had reached out to Alison by physical mail, by flyer, via clear colored posters of our cat at all major intersections on our shared street and directly electronically by text and the "nextdoor" app yet she never once contacted us, never reached out to us and never provided any information about a grey cat that she buried until now, nearly 2 months after the fact.
We find these sets of circumstances and conjunction of facts that she herself readily admitted to if taken as prima facie evidence at face value to be disturbing and suspect, and as the evidence will show and as we will proffer below, if the dead cat that Alison buried in her backyard is actually our cat, then we have reason to believe and do believe there was foul play at work.
James Culver is a project manager for the Lockheed Martin on the classified F35 jet program and lives directly next to our house south of us. Alison is a divorce attorney that lives directly next to James and is two houses south of our house. Both James and Alison are divorced.
My father then went over directly to Alison's house just the other day and verbally verified with her that she did indeed call up a friend whom works for animal services and was able to corroborate everything that James had earlier mentioned to us.
Namely, that Alison's friend in Animal services assisted her with burying the dead cat in her own backyard and also admitted that they did so without first scanning for a microchip, and without taking any photo evidence, and without following proper pickup/disposal procedures nor the process of cataloging the incident to include it in the deceased dogs and cats database which Arlington publishes as a public record here : https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f5fe93a63de0456e8879b46939a8c99e
This was surprising as it was done entirely unbeknownst to us at the time, even though both Alison and James knew and had every reason to know that we were missing a grey cat at the time these events occurred.
This all seems highly unusual and not at all normal. Especially suspect given the fact that I had indeed from "day 1" previously repeatedly alerted everyone to our missing cat from the very beginning in an unequivocally clear and conspicuous manner, but now it would seem in a roundabout and retroactive manner they seem to purport to retrospectively recall incidents that were never disclosed to us, important pertinent information that at the time would have been timely and relevant.
In addition, after I reached out to Alison about all of this and to ask her more questions surrounding this event to help further narrow down the scope and zero in on the timeline in order to "rule in" or "rule out" this being our cat, she subsequently never replied back at all, never provided me the name of the person from Animal Services and coincidentally James Culver also stopped communicating altogether.
My request to her to see if I could get consent to perform an excavation of the buried remains in order to attempt to search for a possible collar (she stated there was a plastic collar, and plastics take millions of years to naturally degrade and decompose) which our missing cat had an unique and distinctive collar that would be unmistakable and definitive in making a positive ID, and also my request to try see if I can get a microchip reading to scan and match etc -- all were to no avail as all went unanswered and ignored...
My car dashcamera evidence shows that on the evening in question in which our cat went missing, James had his pickup truck blocking almost the entire width of the public road (Morris Heights Drive) laterally (perpendicular to the length of the road traversal) and himself and another female were on camera loading something into the back of his large truck.
My aerial drone footages clearly shows that James Culver's parking garage and lot is directly adjoining and connected to that of the parking lot and garage area of Alison's house. And the female in question as captured on my dashcam video that day looks a lot like Alison... Furthermore, on the very night in question Alison later claims she recall her kids were jumping on the trampoline in their backyard and when she was in the backyard there was a bright full moon that illuminated the night and that is when she saw the deceased cat in her backyard, seemingly uninjured but also not in an alive state.
She stated she believed the cat had just very recently died (body felt warm to the touch and wasn't stiff, but there were no pulse nor breathing) and she said she went into a state of shock and panic and then decided to call up her friend from Arlington Animal Services and the friend drove over to Alison's house that night and took care of the situation by helping Alison dig a hole in her backyard and then burying the dead cat inside the hole.
She claims that the cat resembles quite a lot that of our missing cat but when asked she also admitted that there was no attempt by anyone to scan for any microchip, and the entire incident was never officially logged nor cataloged into any database, and no records and no photographic evidence was taken prior to the ad hoc and impromptu makeshift burial. All of this to me makes no sense, and it doesn't fit. Something seems very wrong here...
Astronomical records on the night of interest show that there was a total lunar eclipse that turned the moon into a dark "blood moon" for several hours after dark that night in question. The simple ask we had for Alison was for her to check her own phone/txt/sms records and/or contact the Animal Services friend that she purported to have asked for assistance in the makeshift burial that night and between the two of them to check their phone and other electronic records to triangulate and ascertain the exact date/time of when Alison first called the Animal Services friend.
this would have helped greatly in ascertaining whether or not the dead cat they buried could have been our missing cat. Instead she refuses to cooperate with such a simple request while attempting to convey to us that it should be "case closed" and that "she took care of it" etc...
We believe there may have been some level of foul play or someone isn't telling the whole truth. This incident and case number T22001241 has been opened with Arlington PD with Sergeant Wong (817-459-6061) of APD referring it to Detective David Kubinsky #2256 @ 817-459-6071 whom himself notified me that he has previously already entered our cat's microchip ID serial number 982000411850467 into the NCIC/TCIC databases.
If the allegations are true can the city of Arlington compel Attorney Alison to consent to an excavation, leading to a scanning/identification and/or subsequently a proper burial and proper documentation/cataloging of the deceased cat in question, even if it turns out to not be our missing cat but especially if it turns out to be our cat as both Alison and Culver have attempted to infer/convey that to us.
If someone from Arlington Animal Services was indeed involved in this in some way or another, I hope Arlington will do the right thing and assist us in ascertaining the true identity of the deceased cat and up to and including bringing her home so that we can properly bury her if indeed it is our cat.
High resolution aerial photographic imagery taken from my DJI Mavic 3 at 4k HDR and my car dash camera video evidence as well as voice recorded evidence of the conversation(s) my father had with the neighbor(s) can be provided and furnished to Arlington upon request or demand to help prove and substantially support these aforementioned facts...
Arlington Animal Services Reviews
Someone from and/or associated with Arlington Animal Services recently assisted Alison on 4703 Morris Heights Dr, Arlington, TX 76016 in burying possibly our missing/lost/deceased cat Tutu (microchip id 982000411850467) in her own backyard without first attempting to scan for microchip ID nor without proper incident cataloging and without following official disposal processes.
If the allegations are true the city of Arlington has been asked to compel Attorney Alison Paige Porterfield (Texas State Bar Card Number: 24071034 ) to consent to an excavation, leading to a scanning/identification and/or subsequently a proper burial and proper documentation/cataloging of the deceased cat in question, even if it turns out to not be our missing cat but especially if it turns out to be our cat as both Alison and Culver have attempted to infer/convey that to us.
If someone from Arlington Animal Services was indeed involved in this in some way or another, I hope Arlington will do the right thing and assist us in ascertaining the true identity of the deceased cat and up to and including bringing her home so that we can properly bury her if indeed it is our cat.
Our family (including my father) was recently notified by our direct/immediate nextdoor neighbor a house resident by the name of Mr. James Culver that his direct/immediate nextdoor neighbor an attorney Alison on had recently found a deceased grey cat which they also claim to fit the description of our missing cat Tutu ( tutumissing.com ).
Both James and Alison have stated to us that Alison found a dead cat in her backyard matching the description of our missing cat, but instead of notifying us right away, Alison decided to call her friend who happens to work for Animal Services and they dug a hole in her backyard and subsequently buried the dead cat without first performing a microchip scan nor without proper documentation nor cataloging of the incident.
When our cat went missing we had reached out to Alison by physical mail, by flyer, via clear colored posters of our cat at all major intersections on our shared street and directly electronically by text and the "nextdoor" app yet she never once contacted us, never reached out to us and never provided any information about a grey cat that she buried until now, nearly 2 months after the fact.
We find these sets of circumstances and conjunction of facts that she herself readily admitted to if taken as prima facie evidence at face value to be disturbing and suspect, and as the evidence will show and as we will proffer below, if the dead cat that Alison buried in her backyard is actually our cat, then we have reason to believe and do believe there was foul play at work.
James Culver is a project manager for the Lockheed Martin on the classified F35 jet program and lives directly next to our house south of us. Alison is a divorce attorney that lives directly next to James and is two houses south of our house. Both James and Alison are divorced.
My father then went over directly to Alison's house just the other day and verbally verified with her that she did indeed call up a friend whom works for animal services and was able to corroborate everything that James had earlier mentioned to us.
Namely, that Alison's friend in Animal services assisted her with burying the dead cat in her own backyard and also admitted that they did so without first scanning for a microchip, and without taking any photo evidence, and without following proper pickup/disposal procedures nor the process of cataloging the incident to include it in the deceased dogs and cats database which Arlington publishes as a public record here : https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f5fe93a63de0456e8879b46939a8c99e
This was surprising as it was done entirely unbeknownst to us at the time, even though both Alison and James knew and had every reason to know that we were missing a grey cat at the time these events occurred.
This all seems highly unusual and not at all normal. Especially suspect given the fact that I had indeed from "day 1" previously repeatedly alerted everyone to our missing cat from the very beginning in an unequivocally clear and conspicuous manner, but now it would seem in a roundabout and retroactive manner they seem to purport to retrospectively recall incidents that were never disclosed to us, important pertinent information that at the time would have been timely and relevant.
In addition, after I reached out to Alison about all of this and to ask her more questions surrounding this event to help further narrow down the scope and zero in on the timeline in order to "rule in" or "rule out" this being our cat, she subsequently never replied back at all, never provided me the name of the person from Animal Services and coincidentally James Culver also stopped communicating altogether.
My request to her to see if I could get consent to perform an excavation of the buried remains in order to attempt to search for a possible collar (she stated there was a plastic collar, and plastics take millions of years to naturally degrade and decompose) which our missing cat had an unique and distinctive collar that would be unmistakable and definitive in making a positive ID, and also my request to try see if I can get a microchip reading to scan and match etc -- all were to no avail as all went unanswered and ignored...
My car dashcamera evidence shows that on the evening in question in which our cat went missing, James had his pickup truck blocking almost the entire width of the public road (Morris Heights Drive) laterally (perpendicular to the length of the road traversal) and himself and another female were on camera loading something into the back of his large truck.
My aerial drone footages clearly shows that James Culver's parking garage and lot is directly adjoining and connected to that of the parking lot and garage area of Alison's house. And the female in question as captured on my dashcam video that day looks a lot like Alison... Furthermore, on the very night in question Alison later claims she recall her kids were jumping on the trampoline in their backyard and when she was in the backyard there was a bright full moon that illuminated the night and that is when she saw the deceased cat in her backyard, seemingly uninjured but also not in an alive state.
She stated she believed the cat had just very recently died (body felt warm to the touch and wasn't stiff, but there were no pulse nor breathing) and she said she went into a state of shock and panic and then decided to call up her friend from Arlington Animal Services and the friend drove over to Alison's house that night and took care of the situation by helping Alison dig a hole in her backyard and then burying the dead cat inside the hole.
She claims that the cat resembles quite a lot that of our missing cat but when asked she also admitted that there was no attempt by anyone to scan for any microchip, and the entire incident was never officially logged nor cataloged into any database, and no records and no photographic evidence was taken prior to the ad hoc and impromptu makeshift burial. All of this to me makes no sense, and it doesn't fit. Something seems very wrong here...
Astronomical records on the night of interest show that there was a total lunar eclipse that turned the moon into a dark "blood moon" for several hours after dark that night in question. The simple ask we had for Alison was for her to check her own phone/txt/sms records and/or contact the Animal Services friend that she purported to have asked for assistance in the makeshift burial that night and between the two of them to check their phone and other electronic records to triangulate and ascertain the exact date/time of when Alison first called the Animal Services friend.
this would have helped greatly in ascertaining whether or not the dead cat they buried could have been our missing cat. Instead she refuses to cooperate with such a simple request while attempting to convey to us that it should be "case closed" and that "she took care of it" etc...
We believe there may have been some level of foul play or someone isn't telling the whole truth. This incident and case number T22001241 has been opened with Arlington PD with Sergeant Wong (817-459-6061) of APD referring it to Detective David Kubinsky #2256 @ 817-459-6071 whom himself notified me that he has previously already entered our cat's microchip ID serial number 982000411850467 into the NCIC/TCIC databases.
If the allegations are true can the city of Arlington compel Attorney Alison to consent to an excavation, leading to a scanning/identification and/or subsequently a proper burial and proper documentation/cataloging of the deceased cat in question, even if it turns out to not be our missing cat but especially if it turns out to be our cat as both Alison and Culver have attempted to infer/convey that to us.
If someone from Arlington Animal Services was indeed involved in this in some way or another, I hope Arlington will do the right thing and assist us in ascertaining the true identity of the deceased cat and up to and including bringing her home so that we can properly bury her if indeed it is our cat.
High resolution aerial photographic imagery taken from my DJI Mavic 3 at 4k HDR and my car dash camera video evidence as well as voice recorded evidence of the conversation(s) my father had with the neighbor(s) can be provided and furnished to Arlington upon request or demand to help prove and substantially support these aforementioned facts...