This is another sketchy quack who refuses to hear you out or do her research—the type to make you wonder why she picked up such a profession in the first place, one that puts people's health and lives at stake.
This is a quack who's quick to prescribe you the same Schedule II drug that has been causing you problems — while outright refusing to prescribe a Schedule V drug that has helped you in the past. To note, a Schedule V drug is legally categorized as safer and more dispensable than drugs that are Schedule I, II, III, or IV per federal scheduling.
According to "Angie's" vague, fallacious, and poorly-worded claim, the Schedule V drug is "becoming more addicting," and the "law" says that she "cannot prescribe it." Anyone with half a brain could figure out that something doesn't sound right here. Then, Anzhela has the sudden, strange nerve to "question" your capacity to honestly fill out a questionnaire—as if a piece of paper has more to say than your own face and God-forsaken situation. Regardless, she proceeds to prescribe you the Schedule II drug (again, in a different form) along with a drug that is listed as a contraindication.
To actually help you, in her words, is to risk "malpractice."
This is the type of quack to tell you that you'll do "well" on another drug—after you clearly and vehemently state how you have unsuccessfully tried nearly all useless drugs in its class, having seen unpleasant side effects and zero benefit.
"Yep, we need to do something about your anxiety! For sure!" she'll boast in a vain attempt to win you over. Who's "we?" How condescending does one have to be to decide anything for you, especially with her dismal level of care or knowledge?
Then, when you finally cave in, she smiles as if her job just got worlds easier. But, as you leave, you feel even angrier and more stressed out than you did before. At home, you tell your girlfriend about the disappointing visit, and she cries. She cries because the two of you have been going through this long, lugubrious cycle of dealing with quacks, red tape, and, moreover, your "condition(s)."
Now, tell me: do we need to uphold this culture of greed, distrust, and mediocrity?
Anzhela Davydov Reviews
This is another sketchy quack who refuses to hear you out or do her research—the type to make you wonder why she picked up such a profession in the first place, one that puts people's health and lives at stake.
This is a quack who's quick to prescribe you the same Schedule II drug that has been causing you problems — while outright refusing to prescribe a Schedule V drug that has helped you in the past. To note, a Schedule V drug is legally categorized as safer and more dispensable than drugs that are Schedule I, II, III, or IV per federal scheduling.
According to "Angie's" vague, fallacious, and poorly-worded claim, the Schedule V drug is "becoming more addicting," and the "law" says that she "cannot prescribe it." Anyone with half a brain could figure out that something doesn't sound right here. Then, Anzhela has the sudden, strange nerve to "question" your capacity to honestly fill out a questionnaire—as if a piece of paper has more to say than your own face and God-forsaken situation. Regardless, she proceeds to prescribe you the Schedule II drug (again, in a different form) along with a drug that is listed as a contraindication.
To actually help you, in her words, is to risk "malpractice."
This is the type of quack to tell you that you'll do "well" on another drug—after you clearly and vehemently state how you have unsuccessfully tried nearly all useless drugs in its class, having seen unpleasant side effects and zero benefit.
"Yep, we need to do something about your anxiety! For sure!" she'll boast in a vain attempt to win you over. Who's "we?" How condescending does one have to be to decide anything for you, especially with her dismal level of care or knowledge?
Then, when you finally cave in, she smiles as if her job just got worlds easier. But, as you leave, you feel even angrier and more stressed out than you did before. At home, you tell your girlfriend about the disappointing visit, and she cries. She cries because the two of you have been going through this long, lugubrious cycle of dealing with quacks, red tape, and, moreover, your "condition(s)."
Now, tell me: do we need to uphold this culture of greed, distrust, and mediocrity?
Finally, tell me: is this not malpractice?